(*Editors Note | The White House, again under pressure to account for direct contradictions between its own pre-war remarks aired in a BBC special, and its pro-war sales pitch to congress and the American people has nowhere to go but spin and denial. GOP House leaders continue to attempt to pin blame on the CIA, a strategy that badly backfired in July as the "16 word" controversy sent Mr. Bush's approval ratings plunging. Increasing attention is being paid to profits gleaned by Bush family cronies, most notably Halliburton/Brown & Root, as the White House again attempts to dip into the U.S. treasury to the tune of 87 billion. -- ma.)
��� White House Insists It Had Iraq WMD Intelligence
��� By Reuters
��� Sunday 28 September 2003
��� Washington - White House national security adviser Condoleezza Rice insisted on Sunday there was new U.S. intelligence obtained before the Iraq war about Baghdad's weapons of mass destruction programs, despite an assertion by key congressional leaders that the information was dated or fragmentary.
��� Rice, a top aide to President Bush, dismissed the finding by leaders of the House of Representatives Intelligence Committee that much of the information relied upon long-standing judgments dating back to before U.N. weapons inspectors left Iraq in 1998 that were not routinely challenged by intelligence agencies.
��� "There was enrichment of the intelligence from 1998 over the period leading up to the war," Rice said on the "Fox News Sunday" program. "And nothing pointed to a reversal of Saddam Hussein's very active efforts to acquire weapons of mass destruction."
��� "... It was very clear that this continued and it was a gathering danger," she said. "Yes, I think I would call it new information and it was certainly enriching the case in the same direction."
��� She was responding to concerns of House Intelligence Committee Chairman Porter Goss, a Florida Republican, and Rep. Jane Harman, a California Democrat, in a letter to CIA Director George Tenet dated on Thursday and obtained by Reuters this weekend.
��� 'Constant and Static'
��� "The assessment that Iraq continued to pursue chemical and biological weapons remained constant and static over the past 10 years," the letter said.
��� There was "insufficient specific information" about the former Iraqi president's plans and intentions, the status of Iraq's WMD programs and capabilities, and Iraq's links to al Qaeda, the lawmakers said.
��� The letter, which did not reflect the full committee's opinion, cited weakness in intelligence from spies on the ground and said the government needed to develop better sources.
��� The lawmakers concluded: "There were significant deficiencies with respect to the IC's (intelligence community's) intelligence collection activities concerning Iraq's WMD programs and ties to al-Qa'ida (al Qaeda) prior to the commencement of hostilities there."
��� The United States justified going to war largely because of a threat from Iraq's biological, chemical and nuclear weapons programs, but no such weapons have been found.
��� Secretary of State Colin Powell said he had "no second thoughts" about the decision to go to war.
��� "There was every reason to believe -- and I still believe -- that there were weapons of mass destruction and weapons programs to develop weapons of mass destruction," Powell said on ABC's "This Week."
��� "I don't think we have anything to be regretful about," he added.
��� CIA spokesman Bill Harlow said, "The notion that our community does not challenge standing judgments is absurd."
��� "Iraq was an intractable and difficult subject. The tradecraft of intelligence rarely has the luxury of having black and white facts," he added.
��� CIA adviser David Kay, who has been coordinating the hunt for Iraq's banned weapons, is scheduled to present lawmakers with an interim report in the coming week, but was not expected to reveal that any weapons had been found.
��� Kay's report was "only going to be a progress report and is likely not going to draw any major conclusions," Rice said. "He's got a very long way still to go," she told Fox.
��� An October 2002 National Intelligence Estimate report on Iraq said it had continued its WMD programs, had chemical and biological weapons and was reconstituting its nuclear weapons programs.
��� Go to Original
��� House Probers Conclude Iraq War Data Was Weak
��� By Dana Priest
��� Washington Post
��� Sunday 28 September 2003
��� Leaders of the House intelligence committee have criticized the U.S. intelligence community for using largely outdated, "circumstantial" and "fragmentary" information with "too many uncertainties" to conclude that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and ties to al Qaeda.
��� Top members of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, which spent four months combing through 19 volumes of classified material used by the Bush administration to make its case for the war on Iraq, found "significant deficiencies" in the community's ability to collect fresh intelligence on Iraq, and said it had to rely on "past assessments" dating to when U.N. inspectors left Iraq in 1998 and on "some new 'piecemeal' intelligence," both of which "were not challenged as a routine matter."
��� "The absence of proof that chemical and biological weapons and their related development programs had been destroyed was considered proof that they continued to exist," the two committee members said in a letter Thursday to CIA Director George J. Tenet. The Washington Post obtained a copy this weekend.
��� The letter constitutes a significant criticism of the U.S. intelligence community from a source that does not take such matters lightly. The committee, like all congressional panels, is controlled by Republicans, and its chairman, Rep. Porter J. Goss (R-Fla.), is a former CIA agent and a longtime supporter of Tenet and the intelligence agencies. Goss and the committee's ranking Democrat, Rep. Jane Harman (Calif.), signed the letter. Neither was available for comment yesterday. The full committee has not voted on the letter's conclusions.
��� The CIA, through spokesman Bill Harlow, disputed the conclusions and accused the panel of not conducting "a detailed inquiry on this study."
��� "The notion that our community does not challenge standing judgments is absurd."
��� "To attempt to make such a determination so quickly and without all the facts is premature and wrong," Harlow said. "Iraq was an intractable and difficult subject. The tradecraft of intelligence rarely has the luxury of having black-and-white facts. The judgments reached, and the tradecraft used, were honest and professional -- based on many years of effort and experience."
��� The committee's letter said the buildup to the war in Iraq amounted to "a case study" of the CIA's and other agencies' inability to gather credible intelligence from informants in Iraq or to employ technologies to detect weapons programs.
��� "Lack of specific intelligence on regime plans and intentions, WMD, and Iraq's support to terrorist groups appears to have hampered the IC's [intelligence community's] ability to provide a better assessment to policymakers from 1998 through 2003," the letter said.
��� The administration based its argument for going to war on the dangers allegedly posed by Iraq's chemical, biological and nuclear weapons programs and its supposed ties to al Qaeda. The Goss-Harman letter may give ammunition to critics who say the administration overstated the threat posed by then-Iraqi President Saddam Hussein.
��� The committee became concerned about the underlying intelligence on Iraq when U.S. forces failed to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and when President Bush admitted he should not have used discredited intelligence in January's State of the Union speech to suggest that Iraq had sought to buy uranium from an African nation.
��� The committee reviewed the underlying information used by U.S. intelligence agencies to write a classified October 2002 National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) on Iraq. The NIE was the most comprehensive assessment of Iraq available to lawmakers before the war, and many based their approval of Bush's war resolution on it.
��� The letter acknowledges one sharp difference between the two committee leaders. Harman, the letter indicated, believes the NIE judgments "were deficient with regard to the analysis and presentation." Goss believes the judgments were not deficient and were properly couched to reflect the incomplete nature of the intelligence. A congressional source said Goss "does not believe that [the intelligence] community's judgments were inaccurate."
��� As to Iraq's ties to terrorists, the committee scrutinized three volumes of data and found "substantial gaps" in credible information from human sources that would have allowed U.S. intelligence agencies "to give policymakers a clear understanding of the nature of the relationship." Instead, the agencies had a "low threshold" or "no threshold" on using information the intelligence community obtained on Iraq's alleged ties to al Qaeda.
��� "As a result, intelligence reports that might have been screened out by a more rigorous vetting process made their way to the analysts' desks, providing ample room for vagary to intrude," the letter states. The agencies did not clarify which of their reports "were from sources that were credible and which were from sources that would otherwise be dismissed in the absence of any other corroborating intelligence."
��� Goss and Harman were particularly critical of the underlying intelligence used to conclude that Iraq was reconstituting its nuclear program.
��� "Our examination has identified the relatively fragile nature of this information," the letter states. It notes internal intelligence agency disputes about whether Iraq attempted to buy high-strength aluminum tubes that could be used in nuclear weapons manufacture, and points out the dual-use nature of equipment in other attempted purchases cited in the NIE.
��� Moreover, Goss and Harman dispelled the assertion, made frequently by administration officials, that they possess more concrete information about Iraq's nuclear intention but are unable to disclose it because it remains classified. "We have not found any information in the assessments that are still classified that was any more definitive," the two wrote Tenet.
��� On this point, the letter said the committee "had reviewed extensively the allegations that there was a disconnect between public statements by administration officials and the underlying intelligence."
��� The letter continued: "We do believe . . . that if public officials cite intelligence incorrectly, the IC [intelligence community] has a responsibility to go back to that policymaker and make clear that the public statement mischaracterized the available intelligence." It does not say whether Tenet fulfilled that responsibility.
-------
Jump to TO Features for Monday 29 September 2003
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.)
�
| voting rights | environment | budget | children | politics | indigenous survival | energy |
| defense | health | economy | human rights | labor | trade | women
