Matek:
The Buganda Royals are not the only Ugandan Royals supporting a third term.
What contributive politics have other Royals done for Uganda??
Other tribes too can support whatever position they want, and their silence is what has kept them marginalized in politics and then they end up getting jealousy of the Buganda Royals' influence.
Our Buganda Royals are making some noise to keep the spirit going while other Uganda's Royals marginalize themselves from influencing politics. Why do other tribes feel threatened by what the Buganda Royals have to say?? Who is keeping other tribes from participating in the game?? The relationship between the influential and the marginalized will always be rocky. That's expected, nothing new!
Rehema M.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/7/2003 3:39:12 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I start by looking what we have on the ground
1) We are sleeping today
2) We have the kingdom
3) We hold the Vice presidency post
4) When Museveni gives us Federalism Ssabasajja will lead Uganda
What is wrong with supporting a third term?
Em
EM:
A wise politician once told me that in politics you must make your move very carefully. You must make your move bearing in mind the implications of such moves three, four, ten years from now on you.
Let us face it... Buganda is part and parcel of Uganda whether one likes it or not. Now ask yourself as to whether the move by the so called Buganda royals will essentially play out well for Buganda Royal with it's relationship with other Ugandan Tribes five years from now after Museveni is gone? ... You immediately begin to see the political Mypic of the Buganda. They are pretty much digging the political grave, so to say, of the so called Buganda Royals ! .. especially as it pertains to the Relationship between the Buganda royals and other tribes of Uganda. I SEE EMBIRO!!!
Matek
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
