ugnet_: CONDY RICE DE FACTO ADMITS TO ........

[Edward Mulindwa]

Condy Rice De Facto Admits To NOT Being The NSA By Joseph Ehrlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender, Berl & Sons, Inc 4-11-4 Condy Rice de facto admits to not being the NSA SenderBerl's perspective is that focus should not primarily be on the August 6, 2001 PDB. SenderBerl believes that the most successful line of pursuit is on Condy Rice not having the knowledge needed and necessary to preclude what unraveled as 9-11. This then would be consistent with the line that 9-11 was allowed to happen, that the President's and the Secret Service's behavior on 9-11 were both weird and contrary to protocol, and that proof positive of complicity is inherent when the trillion dollar military machine did not impede or even act to impede four planes off transponder any one of which could have carried a nuclear payload against two major and essential metropolitan areas. ROEMER: So, Dr. Rice, let's say that the FBI is the key here. You say that the FBI was tasked with trying to find out what the domestic threat was. We have done thousands of interviews here at the 9-11 Commission. We've gone through literally millions of pieces of paper. To date, we have found nobody - nobody at the FBI who knows anything about a tasking of field offices. Nothing went down the chain to the FBI field offices on spiking of information, on knowledge of al-Qaida in the country, and still, the FBI doesn't do anything. Isn't that some of the responsibility of the national security adviser? RICE: The responsibility for the FBI to do what it was asked was the FBI's responsibility . Commissioner Lehman in our opinion trying to help Rice inadvertently helped our case that Rice was not and is not the true National Security Advisor. See how many questions you can answer in the affirmative proving our point that she stood open and willing before the nation and the world that she was totally ignorant of facts relevant to the realm of her responsibilities. LEHMAN: Were you told that there were numerous young Arab males in flight training, had taken flight training, were in flight training? RICE: I was not. And I'm not sure that that was known at the center. LEHMAN: Were you told that the U.S. Marshal program had been changed to drop any U.S. marshals on domestic flights? RICE: I was not told that. LEHMAN: Were you told that the red team in FAA - the red teams for 10 years had reported their hard data that the U.S. airport security system never got higher than 20 percent effective and was usually down around 10 percent for 10 straight years? RICE: To the best of my recollection, I was not told that. LEHMAN: Were you aware that INS had been lobbying for years to get the airlines to drop the transit without visa loophole that enabled terrorists and illegals to simply buy a ticket through the transit-without-visa waiver and pay the airlines extra money and come in? RICE: I learned about that after September 11th. LEHMAN: Were you aware that the INS had quietly, internally, halved its internal security enforcement budget? RICE: I was not made aware of that. I don't remember being made aware of that, no. LEHMAN: Were you aware that it was the U.S. government established policy not to question or oppose the sanctuary policies of New York, Los Angeles, Houston, Chicago, San Diego for political reasons, which policy in those cities prohibited the local police from cooperating at all with federal immigration authorities? RICE: I do not believe I was aware of that. LEHMAN: Were you aware - to shift a little bit to Saudi Arabia - were you aware of the program that was well established that allowed Saudi citizens to get visas without interviews? RICE: I learned of that after 9-11. LEHMAN: Were you aware of the activities of the Saudi ministry of religious affairs here in the United States during that transition? RICE: I believe that only after September 11th did the full extent of what was going on with the ministry of religious affairs became evident. LEHMAN: Were you aware of the extensive activities of the Saudi government in supporting over 300 radical teaching schools and mosques around the country, including right here in the United States? RICE: I believe we've learned a great deal more about this and addressed it with the Saudi government since 9-11. LEHMAN: Were you aware at the time of the fact that Saudi Arabia had and were you told that they had in their custody the CFO and the closest confidant of al-Qaida - of Osama bin Laden, and refused direct access to the United States? RICE: I don't remember anything of that kind. LEHMAN: Were you aware that they would not cooperate and give us access to the perpetrators of the Khobar Towers attack? RICE: I was very involved in issues concerning Khobar Towers and our relations with several governments concerning Khobar Towers. LEHMAN: Thank you. Were you aware - and it disturbs me a bit, and again, let me shift to the continuity issues here. Were you aware that it was the policy of the Justice Department - and I'd like you to comment as to whether these continuities are still in place - before I go to Justice, were you aware that it was the policy and I believe remains the policy today to fine airlines if they have more than two young Arab males in secondary questioning because that's discriminatory? RICE: No, I have to say that the kind of inside arrangements for the FAA are not really in my... LEHMAN: Well, these are not so inside. Were you aware that the FAA up until 9-11 thought it was perfectly permissible to allow four-inch knife blades aboard? RICE: I was not aware. LEHMAN: OK. SenderBerl in May 2002, when Condy Rice made her classic faux pax regarding ignorance about terrorists planning on using planes as missiles to drive them into buildings, stood aware of what Condy Rice has the audacity to tell the nation and world she did not know. Incredibly, our position has alwas been that she is telling the truth. Our ability to accept it as the truth is due that it is totally consistent with her not being the National Security Advisor. Yet, while she was ignorant, her role was central to the success of 9-11. See <http://www.senderberl.com/bushrice.htm>www.senderberl.com/bushrice.htm  IF YOU STOP AND THINK ABOUT IT, CONDY RICE IS TELLING US SHE WAS NOT AND IS NOT THE NSA. SHE CANNOT DENY IT, BUT CAN OPEN THE PORTAL FOR US TO MOVE ON IT. COLIN POWELL NO DOUBT AGREES WITH OUR PERSPECTIVE AND HE'S HARD PRESSED TO PUBLICLY COMMENT ON IT. Is Colin Powell Sending a Message to Condoleezza Rice? http://www.rense.com/general51/iscolinpowellsending.htm  Isn't this proof positive that Condy Rice was not and is not the NSA? "She told the commission that she regretted those comments, because at the time she was not aware of intelligence, developed in the late 1990's, that some terrorists were thinking of using airplanes as guided missiles. She told the commission in the private session that she should have said, "I could not have imagined," according to one official familiar with the testimony, making it clear that some in the intelligence community knew about those threats but that she did not. "Information about possible use of airplanes as missiles to destroy buildings was not briefed to her prior to that statement in May 2002," Mr. McCormack said." http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/07/politics/07PANE.html  SenderBerl: Eight months after 9-11, Cheney is filling the airwaves with the imminence of further domestic terrorism and the president's own National Security Advisor was not briefed EIGHT MONTHS AFTER 9-11 that there was intellignce BEFORE 9-11 on MULTIPLE FRONTS about terrorists using airplances to destroy buildings? http://www.guardian.co.uk/september11/story/0,11209,1188133,00.html  SenderBerl: Gary Hart a former presidential candidate and who is a verified expert on domestic matters relating to terrorism has made it known that he finds it incredible that the 9-11 panel has not invited him to testify regarding 9-11. The relayed reason for his ire is that he told Condy Rice, someone he personally knows for twenty years, five days before 9-11, that major domestic terrorism was imminent. Hart told the Guardian his warning had been ignored. "She [Rice] said: 'I'll discuss it with the vice-president'," Mr Hart said; but he felt the response was a brush-off. "All I can say is she didn't feel the degree of urgency I thought was necessary," he said. He said he has known Ms Rice for 20 years, since she had volunteered to work on his Colorado Senate campaign. SenderBerl: There you have yet another proof of not only the sandbagging by the Bush administration of all impediments to allowing 9-11 to unravel, but the reference by Rice to Hart of the true National Security Advisor operating no doubt before 9-11 from his secret bunker with the shadow government overseeing what unraveled as 9-11. No one has really detailed why the high state of alert was abandoned to a state of neglect, allowing the barn door to remain fully open to the events of 9-11. What is inescapable is that 9-11 did reveal itself during this hiatus from full alert. Of course, the evidence by the 9-11 panel that the FBI really hadn't been tasked in terms of the known danger of imminent domestic terrorism, says as much as Rice saying what could we expect from an administration only in office 233 days. The evidence and concern mounts as noted by this excellent editorial we recently encountered . The families of 9-11 victims were on Chris Mathews and detailed the several issues taking five to ten minutes that would blow up this administration. The rest of the world knows that this administration was the sine qua non to the events of 9-11. Only the American people sit stupid and silent to what is in front of them. It is your children and their children that will suffer mightily as the result of your failing to do what you can. If you can't give it the time, if you can't make the small sacrifices that are called for here, then the New World Order aristocrats will tell us what they already have: you deserve what lies ahead for you. We are desperate enough to make a further point regarding Mel Gibson's movie. One of the messages in the movie is whether the sacrifices of one man were worth your speaking up on his behalf when he tried to correct the conditions of which he complained. No one intervened for him when it was necessary and appropriate to do so. The same dynamic was repeated in The Green Mile. There we had a man who tendered to the sick, who could provide miraculous help to those who needed it. When it came between the main character ("man" played by Tom Hanks in the movie) saving the good man or making the necessary personal sacrifice, the main character could only muster superficial sympathy and life time memory for the INNOCENT COURAGEOUS GOOD man allowed to go UNJUSTLY to the electric chair. Our analysis of the Green Mile written in 2000 definitely connects to the true dynamic for good of Mel Gibson's movie. To obtain our analysis simply send a blank E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Every positive action and deed has the ability to change the world and prove to either your benefit and/or that of your family. Even the smallest positive deed. It is important to ask yourself what small positive deed or deeds can I do this week, and next week, that will help. What sacrifice am I willing to make to help my family, my country, my fellow man and myself. Heavenly rewards are given to men whom do not lead complacent lives. Evil has much energy and wide resources to pursue its course. Good requires you to think in terms of positive deeds and sacrifice. It will ultimately help assure a better world. Remember, Condy Rice was not the National Security Advisor. The true National Security Advisor made it certain that the events of 9-11 would unravel as planned to create the condition of moral outrage necessary to proffer the dramatic doctrines of the President's National Security Strategy, which documented an agenda for world domination and control and affirmatively diminished and cast off the United States Constitution www.senderberl.com/nss.pdf. You have to speak up for the 3000 innocent souls lost that day. You must further understand that each of those souls can represent tens of thousands that will die tomorrow from the failure to confront and address the sins of that day.  The Mulindwas Communication Group "With Yoweri Museveni, Uganda is in anarchy"             Groupe de communication Mulindwas "avec Yoweri Museveni, l'Ouganda est dans l'anarchie"