From: Godfrey
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2004 4:28 AM
Subject: Social classes are a reality even today

Social classes are a reality even today

Beti Kamya Turwomwe

Beti Kamya Turwomwe

Uganda not yet ready for (political) parties � Museveni � screamed Sunday Vision�s front page last week!

While closing a leadership training course for East African Students at Makerere University on August 13, President Museveni reportedly reiterated his overplayed and long outdated song on the relevance of political parties in Africa, saying, �The environment in African countries is not conducive for multipartyism to thrive because THERE IS NO RIGHT SOCIAL BASE FOR IT... (emphasis mine)�.

And if you think that is shocking, it is because you haven�t heard him say that the right time to �discuss political parties would be in 1789 during the French Revolution... because France had four distinct social classes, each one struggling to protect their interests��.

In other words, according to the only person in Uganda with a vision, only social classes categorically defined as feudalists, capitalists, industrial workers and peasants, as they existed during the period of the French Revolution, have the legitimacy to freedom of association and to express their various interests through formation of political parties!

Knowing the poor reading culture in Uganda, M7 always awes his listeners by daring them to �read the emergence and formation of political parties in Europe�, as if there is any fundamental difference between social classes in the Europe of 1789 and Uganda today.

A famous story of the 1789 French Revolution goes that Queen Marie Antoinette, who, watching the hungry, rioting peasants outside her husband�s palace was baffled why anybody should make so much fuss over bread.

Protected all her life from the harsh realities of life outside the nobility, Marie Antoinette said, �If there is no bread, give them cakes�. Lucky Marie didn�t even know that if you cannot afford bread, the peasants� food, certainly you cannot afford cakes.

What is the difference between Marie Antoinette of 1789 and Museveni�s daughter of 2004, who, without a thought about the medicine-less clinics and hospitals of Uganda, takes a whole plane to herself to have her baby in Germany? Or, what is the difference between a resident of the Kasubi slums whose family went to bed hungry last night and the hungry peasant of the French Revolution?

Although centuries apart, Marie Antoinette and Museveni�s daughter live in the same world, very far removed from that of the Kasubi slum dweller and the French revolution peasant.

Museveni successfully marketed his anti-political parties view during the honeymoon years of his rule, when most Ugandans, like the young, adoring, na�ve bride, just took in whatever he said.

Unfortunately, he has failed to realise that while he has remained static in his deception, Ugandans are 18 years older, wiser and have developed independent views on democracy.

Political parties may have their beginnings in the Europe of the 18th century, but they are just an _expression_ of the principle and concept of organised alternative ways of seeing, saying and doing things differently by different political players, in a free and fair environment.

Thus, different people with common interests organise themselves into a group, historically known as a political party, define their background, articulate their interests, propose ways of achieving them and present their proposal to the public for endorsement or rejection.

Eating cooked food, wearing clothes, building houses, drama, music, writing, courts, leadership hierarchy etc all have historical foundations, but they are good principles which have stood the test of time, so we just keep adapting them to the times.

There is nothing new or original that we do today that does not have historical foundations.

Museveni said that in demanding the return to multipartyism before reading about the French Revolution and formation of political parties in Europe, �Africans abdicated thinking�, but I think that he is the one who did and resorted to parroting the post-independence African communist politicians of the 1960s/70s, whose theories have long been abandoned by the free world.

Published on: Sunday, 22nd August, 2004

Email this article to a friend.

� Copyright The New Vision, 2000-2004. All rights reserved.

Reply via email to