ugnet_: Fwd: Study Suggests Language Shapes Thoughts

musamize ssemakula Tue, 24 Aug 2004 15:35:33 -0700

Note: forwarded message attached.

Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!

--- Begin Message ---

Scientific American, August 20, 2004

Study Suggests Language Shapes Thoughts

Shakespeare once wrote �that which we call a rose, by any other name would smell as sweet.� But does the fact that it's called a rose actually affect how people perceive the flower? That's a question that has been puzzling scientists since the 1930s, when Benjamin Lee Whorf proposed his linguistic theory that language can influence the nature and content of thought. Findings published online today by the journal Science support the Whorfian hypothesis and indicate that the language of numbers shapes how members of a small South American tribe count.
Peter Gordon of Columbia University spent years studying an isolated Amazon tribe called the Pirah� that has fewer than 200 members. Pirah� people use a counting system in which quantities beyond two are not differentiated but are instead referred to simply as �many.� In addition, the word for �one� can actually mean �approximately one.� To test whether this systems limits how the Pirah� perceive larger amounts, Gordon gave tribe members numerical tasks in which they were asked to match small groups of items based on how many objects were present. Although the adults performed well when there were one, two or three items, their accuracy declined when there were eight to 10 things. With larger groups, they always answered incorrectly.
The results indicate that language can define cognition, at least when it comes to numbers. �Whether one language chooses to distinguish one thing versus another affects how an individual perceives reality,� Gordon says. But he cautions that the situation may be unique, and that the linguistic determinism theory may not hold for all types of thought. --Sarah Graham

---

an aside:

In Luganda anaimals are generally uncountable. Thus enkoko can mean 1 or many chickens, and so it is with cattle and many animals (empologoma, embizzi, embuzi , etc)

However, as a friend told me, in Lugwere -- with which Luganda has about 68% lexical similarity, onkoko is one chicken and enkoko is 2 or more. Likewise, onte is one cow, and ente are 2 or more cows.

What about counting in other languages?

--- End Message ---

Scientific American, August 20, 2004

Study Suggests Language Shapes Thoughts

Shakespeare once wrote �that which we call a rose, by any other name would smell as sweet.� But does the fact that it's called a rose actually affect how people perceive the flower? That's a question that has been puzzling scientists since the 1930s, when Benjamin Lee Whorf proposed his linguistic theory that language can influence the nature and content of thought. Findings published online today by the journal Science support the Whorfian hypothesis and indicate that the language of numbers shapes how members of a small South American tribe count. Peter Gordon of Columbia University spent years studying an isolated Amazon tribe called the Pirah� that has fewer than 200 members. Pirah� people use a counting system in which quantities beyond two are not differentiated but are instead referred to simply as �many.� In addition, the word for �one� can actually mean �approximately one.� To test whether this systems limits how the Pirah� perceive larger amounts, Gordon gave tribe members numerical tasks in which they were asked to match small groups of items based on how many objects were present. Although the adults performed well when there were one, two or three items, their accuracy declined when there were eight to 10 things. With larger groups, they always answered incorrectly. The results indicate that language can define cognition, at least when it comes to numbers. �Whether one language chooses to distinguish one thing versus another affects how an individual perceives reality,� Gordon says. But he cautions that the situation may be unique, and that the linguistic determinism theory may not hold for all types of thought. --Sarah Graham --- an aside: In Luganda anaimals are generally uncountable. Thus enkoko can mean 1 or many chickens, and so it is with cattle and many animals (empologoma, embizzi, embuzi , etc) However, as a friend told me, in Lugwere -- with which Luganda has about 68% lexical similarity, onkoko is one chicken and enkoko is 2 or more. Likewise, onte is one cow, and ente are 2 or more cows. What about counting in other languages?

ugnet_: Fwd: Study Suggests Language Shapes Thoughts

Reply via email to