Mayanja Nkangi
 

In its editorial of October 16, The New vision most commendably called for 
increased economic growth in Uganda at double digit rates of growth, echoing 
the World Bank. In doing so, however, an intriguing statement was made, as 
follows: 
�Macro-economic stability is a good thing and even crucial for sustainable 
growth but is not and end in itself.� 
Now here was a classic ambivalence. Macro-economic stability is critical or 
decisive for securing enduring economic growth, so that sustainable growth is 
practically inconceivable without the stability. And yet stability is NOT an 
end in itself! Human blood is crucial for human life, and yet it is not an end 
in itself. 
The decisive determinant or agent of human existence is not in itself desirable 
although it is what it is IN itself that guarantees human life. What sophistry! 
Clearly, the expression, �not an end in itself� means �not intrinsically; not 
for its own sake, as an object of pursuit or desire.� 
Something is an end in itself if, by its intrinsic quality or attribute, it 
serves a specific purpose, whether or not the purpose is ultimate or only 
contributory to the realisation of another desired objective. Blood then is an 
end in itself, an end being an object of pursuit for some specific purpose, 
value or usefulness, however perceived. 
thus the expression �in itself� relates only to the intrinsic usefulness or 
value which an end generates or serves. The above argument applies word for 
word for macro-economic stability in relation to sustainable economic growth, 
if we substitute �macro-economic stability� for blood. 
It follows that macro-economic stability is an end in itself, whose intrinsic 
usefulness lies in its promotional role for sustainable economic growth. The 
view that macro-economic stability is not an end in itself is a recipe for 
economic disaster. If it were adopted by the managers of the economy it would 
eliminate the maintenance of macro-economic stability as a legitimate objective 
of national economic policy, at all times and for all levels of output or 
economic growth. 
Such policy laissez-faire would have dire consequences, unless it was 
unrealistically assumed that the economic system would consistently insulate 
itself against ills such as underemployment or hyperinflation. 
Undoubtedly macro-economic stability has its own economic usefulness, and to 
hold otherwise is to court financial recklessness in the management of the 
economy, which can only be arrested at a great cost. If anyone doubts this, let 
them try macro-economic instability whereby the sources, incidence, magnitudes, 
frequency, and duration of the relative changes in the major variables of the 
economy are erratic, unpredictable, and relentlessly divergent; these variables 
being savings, investment, output or income, prices, interest rates, the money 
supply and the foreign exchange rates. 
Instability in these variables will create such a havoc of adverse expectations 
among businessmen and consumers that the cherished economic growth will itself 
be seriously destablised. Therefore policy makers and implementers will do well 
to continue focusing on macro-economic stability as a legitimate and crucial 
objective of economic management. It is an economic growth. 
Macro-economic instability would be a vicious cat among the pigeons. 
Macro-economic stability designates a structural state of the economy and 
indicates the relative relationships between determinate or measurable 
magnitudes of the above variables and changes in them. It is, therefore, an 
invaluable management compass on the high seas of potential economic 
turbulence. 

The writer is leader of 
the Conservative party 


Indeed it would not be an economic irrelevance even if, theoretically at any 
rate, economic growth was zero as when the economy was at full employment. 
But, to be charitable, 
since macro-economic stability can be achieved at low levels of output, it is 
conceivable that the apparent denigration of macro-economic stability in the 
New Vision was intended purely as a caution against smug complacence on the 
part of the policy makers, once some degree of stability was registered. 
In that case the caution could not have been more salutary and significant. 
There can be no laurels to rest on as long as the growth potential remained 
unexploited. 

The writer is leader of 
the Conservative party
 




Bwanika 
________

http://www.idr.co.ug
--> for your consultancy needs

http://p201.ezboard.com/fugandamanufacturersassociationfrm1

-----------------------------------------------------------
Spela poker mot verkliga m�nniskor �ver Internet. �ver 60 000 spelare online
http://www.multipoker.com




_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

Reply via email to