|
In 1994, a new infectious and sexually-transmitted herpes
virus called "human herpes virus-8" was proclaimed to be the agent causing all
pre-AIDS and AIDS-related KS. This virus is now widely accepted as the sole
cause. I thought it rather strange that there was never any evidence that KS was
transmissible before AIDS, and that a "new" virus could cause a rare cancerous
disease that has been around since the 1870s.
Montagnier thinks mycoplasmas might be a necessary "co-factor"
which accelerates the progression of HIV infection in AIDS patients. He also
believes antibiotic therapy along with antiviral therapy is better treatment for
AIDS. Where did these new mycoplasmas come from? Where did HIV come from?
Offering homophobic explanations and no evidence in his Virus book, the French
virologist theorizes that American gay tourists brought back these agents from
Africa to the U.S.
Evidence of blood infection with the new KS human herpes
virus-8 is now present in as many as 40% of men with prostate cancer. In Texas,
15% of normal blood donors now test positive for the virus. This means the virus
is in the American blood supply; and blood is not screened for the virus. Where
did the "new" herpes virus come from? A "close relative" is the Herpes saimiri
virus of squirrel monkeys, a virus that was extensively passed around in the
Special Virus Cancer Program.
Chimpanzees and the Polio Vaccine Theory of AIDS
In 1999 the publication of The River: A Journey to the Source
of HIV and AIDS, by journalist Edward Hooper, received widespread media
attention. Hooper theorizes that HIV was introduced into Africans via chimp
virus-contaminated polio vaccine programs in the late 1950s. His massive book
does not adequately explain why it took 30 years for the epidemic to appear in
Africa, nor how a sexually-transmitted disease in black Africans in the early
1980s could have transformed itself into a white gay man's disease in New York
City in the late 1970s. Furthermore, there are no HIV-positive tissue or blood
specimens from Africa from the 1960s and 1970s, and no proven cases of AIDS
either, to indicate HIV was "incubating" in the African population. Hooper
quickly dismisses the claims of Robert Strecker, the first physician
whistle-blower of man-made AIDS, as well as the man-made research in my own two
books on the man-made origin: AIDS & The Doctors of Death, and Queer
Blood.
By predating his polio vaccine theory back to the late 1950s,
Hooper greatly simplified his theory of AIDS origin. He ignores all the
primate/simian viruses that were placed into human tissue in the 60s and 70s,
and all those genetically altered viruses for cancer research, vaccine research,
and secret biological warfare.
The chimp in the freezer at Fort Detrick
On February 1, 1999 Lawrence K Altman, M.D, longtime
AIDS-writer for The New York Times, dutifully reported "the riddle of the origin
of the AIDS virus has apparently been solved." A team of researchers, headed by
Beatrice Hahn at the University of Alabama, performed viral studies on three
chimps in the African wild and studied the frozen remains of a chimp, discovered
by accident in a freezer at the Army's biowarfare center at Fort Detrick. The
chimp had tested positive for HIV in 1985. On the basis of this research, Hahn
declared that a common subspecies of chimp (Pan troglodytes troglodytes) was the
animal source of the virus "most closely" related to HIV. In a media blitz U.S.
government scientists presented a phylogenetic ancestral "family tree" of
primate viruses (which few people could understand) to prove that HIV was
genetically descended from a chimp virus in the African bush.
Hahn theorizes the epidemic could have started when a hunter
became infected by cutting himself while butchering chimp meat. Back in the
1980s Hahn worked in Gallo's lab, and like Gallo she ignores the entire history
of animal cancer virus laboratory transfers in the decades preceding AIDS, as
well as the fact that chimp kidneys were transplanted into humans back in the
1960s in New York City. Another big problem is that after scientists pump
viruses into captive lab chimps in laboratories in the U.S. and Africa, they
sometimes release them back into the wild. Obviously, the mix of lab animal
viruses with viruses in the wild make the determination of viral "ancestry"
somewhat iffy.
AIDS scientists totally accepted Hahn's notion that HIV jumped
species from chimps to humans back in the 1930s to start the epidemic. The media
again explained this was the first time that primate viruses had jumped species
"naturally," again failing to mention all the millions of people around the
world who had the primate/simian SV40 virus injected into them along with their
polio shot.
How accurate and meaningful is the ancestry of all these
animal retroviruses? Do words used by scientists to compare different viruses,
such as "closely related" and "distally related" (meaning related far from the
point of origin) really tell us how a suspected primate virus like HIV got into
the human population? For example, it is widely reported in scientific circles
that no two HIV viruses are exactly alike. This is because HIV mutates readily
and takes on some of the molecular components of the cells it invades. When it
comes to viral "relationships" the only absolutely identical HIV viruses in
scientific history was the virus presented by Gallo as his discovery, and the
virus presented by Montagnier as his discovery. The genetic evidence indicated
it was impossible for these two scientists to have discovered identical viruses
on two different continents, even though Gallo insisted his virus was not the
same as Montagnier's. Thus, the lawsuit.
The moral of this story is: If the two most highly respected
AIDS scientists cannot agree on the ancestry of identical twin viruses, then how
can we be sure when they tell us which virus is related to which virus --
particularly when many engineered laboratory viruses are not even recorded and
entered into so-called virus banks or registries which are used to compare the
genetic make-up of "known" viruses. Let's face it, if your old ancestors are not
recorded in a book somewhere, you will never find them as ancestors.
The Mulindwas Communication Group
"With
Yoweri Museveni, Uganda is in
anarchy"
Groupe de communication Mulindwas
"avec Yoweri Museveni, l'Ouganda est dans
l'anarchie"
|
