Georgi
Ms. Joe has issued very serious charges against you and your activities. She says you are deeply involved with Mr. James Blanchard 11; a man who has been instrumental in offering unwaivering support to enemies of Africa and Africans and stooges of the United States like Jonas Savimbi of Angola and, Mobutu Sese Seko of Zaire (DRC) .
Ms. Joe states that Mr.James Blanchard 11 , is or did actually rendering financial support to Your Organization, the Free Africa Foundation . You need to rebuttal Ms. Joe�s allegations ( if that is what it is).
Otherwise you and your so called Organization risk being dismissed by many Africans, including Ugandans, as nothing other then an imperialist front whose purpose is to confuse Africans as they struggle against true political and economic emancipation from the grip of imperialist and Neo- colonialist forces. Many Africans and I await your reply to Ms. Joe�s charges or is it Artillary!!!
Matek
her article follows
George Ayittey:
Your "roforofo" - mudsliding abilities can be traced to your dysfunctional home, lack of parental guidance and training, and deep seated inferiority complex that no amount of education or de-colonization program can erase. You need psychological counseling. Here is a delusional gambler claiming he is responsible for putting Ghana's President Kuffour in power but fell out because the president is going astray.
African peoples, this same ruthless moron with blood money reasons that colonialism was responsible for roads and railways, hence beneficial to Africa. Just because a little luncheon for him with hamburgers and biscuits to peddle his garbage is around the corner, he cannot contain his excitement with the outrageous. The slave, once more, has been invited to interface with his masters, judging from this ruffian's traditional, bad manners.
Here is a man , George Ayittey, who was recruited by persons such as James Blanchard 11 to set up a front (they called it Free Foundation Africa) as a counter voice to African American Civil Rights activists in Africa, especially when the Randall Robinsons were fighting against Apartheid. Who is James Blanchard 11 who sat on the pioneering Free Africa Foundation board and gave Ayittey pocket allowance, flying him to educate the world on Africa?
The same Mr. Blanchard who was sponsoring Ian Smith of Rhodesia, REMANO and South Africa's resistance to dismantle Apartheid. It was a desperate time until Sentaor Jesse Helms, in his fo
reign
relations portfolio, sent his staff to help Ian Smith draft resistant positions. Helms called aid to Africa "sinking money in a rat hole." Does it surprise anyone when Ayittey picks up the script to argue that the West did not purposely use aid to assist African dictators, when evidence points to the contrary? Peoples these are facts. What has color got to do with it? It is the deed. And
if not driven by color, that is for Ayittey to decide. It is him who uses blood money to operate Free Africa Foundation; just like the Mobutus, Idi Amins, Abachas, etc, whom he calls coconut heads. What a hypocrite!
As it is getting plainer, Ayittey's sponsored presence in the public was to usher a revisionist history and to shift focus from atrocities committed by the West, even when some constituencies in the West have admitted to the theivery and butchery. Any keen observer knows that after the Cold War, there would be geopolitical realignments and soul searching. Ayittey's duty and books are meant
to deflect Western follies and paint Africa as the original example of self-destruction. The West and colonialism came to help and did the best but Africa was too hopeless to be saved. That is the platform on which Ayittey's African Solutions are based.
And this fool incarnate expected me to write to newspapers supporting his idiocies. That's why he had to post the Farrakhan article I wrote. The difference is that other Africans can independently challenge African leadership just as they can call to question Western Shenanigans. But Ayittey is at the mercy of his Western sponsors. He will curse his own mother if she dared question the presence of a colonial mistress in a Ghana village.
But here is the huge problem. Ayittey cannot meet his billings. He sold himself as someone capable of penetrating the African society, cause dissensions and diversions. But he has not been successful so far in mainstream press, partly due to African American dismissal of him as a nutty and inebriated opportunist. He wrote books. Ask him how many Civil Rights communities have hosted him? So he tried the Internet with African groups. Thanks
to able and astute Africans, he finds himself, once more, marginalized, unable to make a headway.
The reality is that Ayittey is so frustrated with his mis-diagnosed predictions that Continental Africans will hail him as "sage master," and Free Africa Foundation will overshadow respected organizations like TransAfrica. But beside a visionary giant like Randall Robinson, George Ayittey is like a craze man, an osu (as Nigerian will call
it), an
outcast in the midst of his own people he is supposed to unchain.
By and large he has been written off and and nobody gives a hoot what he does elsewhere. But when he comes to the Black forum to disperse his garbage, he must be asked to collect and stuff his rubbish. When Africans challenge him, he sinks into all manners of desperation, getting into infantile, personal diatribes. See his sorry exit from talkNigeria. Mwananchi is the only place he can cross-fertilize rotten eggs with whites who think like him.
You have all seen that he cannot stand my simple, logical pierce into his farce. Now he wants to talk about my skin and hair. Ayittey is an unscrupulous but poor pupil of Lee Atwater, the Machiavellian, conservative strategist. Their idea is to change the topic if you cannot challenge the facts and go personal with all the feces and mud you can concoct and think of. But people, I am more than equal for Ayittey to shakedown.
First of all, Ayittey is objectively an ugly man (see him on TV) with an uglier personality - someone who cannot carry on a rationale discourse when challenged. As he takes orders from his superiors, each morning, with his stinking mouth (based on what comes out of it), he fancies himself as the house nigger giving orders to field niggers when he comes to a black arena. When he is met head-on, he crumbles and can only find his feet as a mudwrestler. But at least if Ayittey wants to comment on physical appearances, he should show his own woman in public and look like a human being; not like an ape who did not complete the full evolution.
Ask him whether he did not see my skin and hair when I defended his right to his white choices. Or maybe he thought I was a descendant of whites? Talk about Sour Grape.
Ask this sour grape why he jumped like a monkey any time I asked him to do something. He has been to my events, with an overflowing capacity of Northern and Sub-sahara Africans, and the Mayor of Washington, DC, his entire cabinets that included whites. A white person has not and can never be an issue. It is the racist tendencies predicated on color that must be confronted.
Ask this sour grape why he contacted me to publish my article? Remember, the original article was published in African Profiles by a respected Africanist - Dr. Chudi Uwazurike in New York. Can Ayittey's woman, straight or narrow, write English to be published? Or colonialism was not beneficial for females in his family?
Ask this sour grape why he submitted himself to be interviewed by me on the radio on his Indigenous African Institutions where I made him sound like an indoctrinated idiot. Would anyone agree to be interviewed by someone they do not respect? Do I need to prove that Ayittey is a juvenile mind trapped in an adult's body?
Then ask this sour grape whether his own make- believe woman can open her mouth in public. People, whenever you see any man wanting to engage a woman in gutter talk, he is projecting what happens in his own domestic settings.
For a man who, evidently, who has been part of my audience, sending me private email to thank me when I defended him, do I need to call Ayittey a PERFECT BASTARD when he takes pot shots because I held him to the same standards of accountability that he accuses others of lacking? It is self-evident I busted his bubbles with factual information. When an emasculated stooge is overpowered by woman he heads for the toilet, full of sh*it.
But Ayittey,
1) I am not responsible for your unkempt self and permanent bad breathe. You need good soap and toothpaste.
2) If you think I am interested in peddling stories about your undetermined sexuality and harassments, that's your business; not mine. You are doing a better job exposing yourself. I have been in your office, sometimes alone, and took messages. I know the types of private messages you get and how you get sponsored. But I am interested in your public dishonesty when you interact with other Africans; not your inconsequential private life.
3) I am not responsible for Meron (lady) quitting without giving you notice. You complained to me, but I spared you the embarrassment, not giving you the real reason. That is a fact.
4) I am not responsible for you you lying that Free Africa Foundation has gained popularity in the African community, with African groups setting up chapters. In truth, the chapters you sent to donors are fakes. Some of the addresses are warehouses and some of the organizations have missions quite contrary to your shameless activities. These are facts.
5) I am not responsible for you using my name and organization as a chapter of Free Africa Foundation when I never gave you the permission or discussed anything of that sort. This is a fact.
6) I am not responsible for you being a clown in the black community. Your ideas are limited to your sponsors' circles. This is a fact, evidenced by your medium.
7) I have nothing against white peoples, some have been house boys, butlers, and maids to my family. Some have been peers. The difference between me and you is that you need to sell your soul; I do not. When I walk on the podium, it is unmistaken who is talking. An African woman and no lackey. Check the rooster, even Jeane KirkPatrick, a conservative, is on the same Renaissance Women.
Blonde wigs, I can talk about that, too. If Bo Derek can imitate African corn rows, African women can wear blonde, red, orange and, and painted wigs. You got the thrill with white women stealing the show and not black women? Or colonialism did not leave blonde wigs behind, just your rustic brains? Whatever, I have white men panting, just as you pant, kneel and perspire in front of white women. You have problem with such equal opportunity?
You forgot to comment on my shape. It blew your mind, or you have no problem when your white mistress, who command you, spend millions to approximate the behind and lips of an African woman?
When they throw you pittance to write your books and take off for vacation for a tan, you do not marvel at White strangeness? Or you find it strange that an African woman can be fair? Is that your standard for beauty? When you look like someone who uses palm oil for lotion, how can you tell what kind of oil maintains or changes color? Must I assume that since, apparently, you do not use deodorant, you rub sh*t under your armpit?
You, bush man, can continue pinching yourself everyday to make sure you are not dreaming to find yourself in America and eating on the same table with Whites. But rest assured that whenever you show your ugliness in an African forum, you will be reminded that some blacks are not fools as your brainwashed faculties are conditioned to operate.
Have a productive day.
MsJoe