Mw. Muwanga-Zake / netters,

it is not unusual for people like Ocaya p'Ocure to declare that Mengo wanted to kick Obote's government off Buganda soil, without making any attempt to mention the events culminating in that act, thereby giving the impression that somehow the members of the Lukiiko just woke up one fine morning and decided to order Obote out of Buganda without any reason. As I will show below, several attempts were made, not only by the Great Lukiiko but also by the then President Muteesa II himself, to bring Obote to reason and convince him to change his ways and retract his unconstitutional acts - all to no avail. It was only after all attempts had failed, that the Lukiiko made it clear that the basis on which Buganda had agreed to be part of an independent country called Uganda had been violated and told Obote to remove his government from Buganda soil.

Having said that, the Lukiiko was the only institution that made any visible attempt to stop Obote's illegal acts while others were numb due to his machinations.

Now to the events:

The Uganda government had supported the Congolese Simba rebels led by Gbenye (an army whose fighters dressed in monkey skins and cannibalized their opponents) during the armed conflict between Tshombe and Gbenye in the early 60s. At the end of the operations, some Ugandan MPs started raising questions as to who authorized the Uganda forces beyond guarding the Uganda border. There were also allegations that gold and ivory was brought back and shared among certain individuals. The issue was first publicly discussed in Parliament when a government backbencher tabled a motion on 12th March 1965 concerning the security situation in Buganda, the main objective of which was to ban Kabaka Yekka (KY) by branding it a party of criminals. During the debate, a DP member, Gaspari Oda, sought to amend the motion by adding corruption in the civil service and armed forces, which he said was a factor in the insecurity not only in Buganda but throughout the country. The amendment was finally defeated but not before Daudi Ochieng (KY) and Alexander Latim (DP) had introduced a lot of information in support of the amendment. Ochieng confirmed that the insecurity was not confined to Buganda but was spread throughout the country; that the soldiers patrolling near the Congo border in West Nile were becoming lawless; that morale in the armed forces was low due to the soldiers' belief that a few senior officers were making personal financial gain out of the border incidents.

Ochieng also informed Parliament that Amin, who was then Deputy Commander of the Uganda Army, had visited West Nile several times and had been seen bringing back parcels to his home in Entebbe which he guarded with utmost security. Through a mistake by the post office, whereby Amin's bank statement was put into the wrong box, the following information about his deposits became available: he had deposited $1500 on 5th February 1965; $9000 on 15th Feb; $3000 on 17th Feb; $28250 on 26 Feb and $3250 on 2nd March. As Amin had no known private means of income, Ochieng wanted Onama, the Minister of Defence, to initiate an investigation into this sudden windfall. Incidentally, Onama had told Parliament at the beginning of the debate that Amin's bank account stood at $2400.

Before introducing the information to Parliament, Ochieng and Latim had the courtesy of informing Onama and the Inspector Gneral of Police about the whole situation. When Amin got wind of the reports, he phoned Latim and threatened to kill him and Ochieng. He later apologized to both gentlemen claiming that he had been upset by the allegations about his bank account. Onama, on his part, dismissed the allegations against Amin calling them "latrine talks". He even suggested that Amin's relatives had given him the money, or that Congolese refugees might have given it to him for safe keeping. Realizing the futility of his justifications, Onama promised to initiate investigations into the matter. The investigations were never carried out, since Brigadier Opolot, the Commander of the Uganda Army, was prevented from initiating them according to the Military Law.

The matter was left unanswered until Ochieng revived it on 4th February 1966 after the Penal (Amendment) Bill, section 41, which sought to curb the activities of KY, had been passed. His motion sought to suspend Amin pending investigations into his account. Ochieng alleged that some members of the government, together with Colonel Amin, were planning a coup to overthrow the Constitution. During the debate, it was disclosed that Milton Obote, Felix Onama and Adoko Nekyon, Minister of Planning and Community Development, had received large amounts of money from gold and elephant tusks from Congo after Uganda Army's incursions into that country. All the ministers present, except Onama (who denied the charges), were of the opinion that there was substance in the allegations. The Prime Minister knew that Ochieng would introduce the motion on 4th February but in his usual cowardly manner decided to go on a tour of the North from 1st Feb. until 12th Feb. All MPs present on both sides of the House, except government-backbencher John Kakonge, agreed to the suspension of Idi Amin and the police investigations. Nevertheless, Colonel Amin was just given two weeks' leave in contradiction to Parliament's wishes. Kakonge curiously stated that Obote's absence was suspicious.

On 13th February 1966, nine days after the accusations against him, Obote called a press conference and denied ever receiving gold or tusks from Congo or participating in any plans to overthrow the Constitution. As to the suspension of Amin, he said that there were still legal hitches to be straightened out before Parliament's resolution could be put into effect. Meanwhile, Onama, Amin and Nekyon also denied the accusations and demanded an apology from Ochieng within two days, which Ochieng rightly ignored. On 15th February the Cabinet asked Obote to read a statement to the press announcing it's decision to set up a judicial commission to investigate Ochieng's allegations. He also called on Ochieng to make a statement to the police by 19th February. Ochieng made the statement to the police but instead of suspension, Obote promoted Amin to the post of Commander of Uganda Army with effect from 23rd February 1966 and created a new post of Military Advisor to the Cabinet into which he moved Brigadier Opolot. (this is nowadays called 'putting someone on katebe').

On 22nd February, Obote out of the blue staged a coup d'etat against his own government and usurped all powers with the following statement:

'In the interest of national stability and public security and tranquility, I have today, the 22nd day of February 1966, taken over all powers of the government of Uganda. (under which article of the constitution ?)
I shall henceforth be advised by a Council whose members I shall name later.
I have taken this course of action independently because of my understanding of the wishes of the people of this country for peace, order and prosperity. (yeah, right !) Five former ministers have today been put under detention pending investigations into their activities. I call upon the judges and magistrates, civil servants - both Uganda and expatriate members of the security forces and the general public to carry on with their normal duties. I take this opportunity to assure everybody that the whole situation is under control.'

The five ministers who were arrested during a cabinet meeting and put under detention were: Dr. E.S. Lumu- Minister of Health and Chairman of UPC Buganda Region; Grace Ibingira - Minister of State and Chairman of UPC Ankole Kingdom; M. Ngobi - Minister of Agriculture & Cooperatives; B.K. Kirya - Minister of Mineral and Water Resources and Chairman of UPC Bukedi District and G.B. Magezi - Minister of Housing and Labour.

Obote's acts were the beginning of unconstitutionalism in Uganda. Firstly, contrary to the Constitution, one man had usurped all powers of the Government. Secondly, although the Prime Minister had the right to select his own Cabinet, the ministers had to be appointed by the President. Consequently, a minister could only be dismissed if the President (with the advice of the Prime Minister) so directed. As to the five ministers, the President had not so directed. Thirdly, the warrants for detention were signed by a magistrate long after the ministers had been arrested and deported to Patiko in Gulu. This was done even before a judicial inquiry, as prescribed by law, was initiated.

But that wasn't all. On 24th Feb. 1966 came the big blow. Obote suspended the Constitution with effect from 7pm of that day and issued a declaration purpoting to implement his unconstitutional acts. There was no provision in the Constitution for the suspension of the Constitution or any part of it by either the National Assembly or any individual. Obote justified his unconstitutional acts by making false claims that while on his tour of the North, some people in high places were making requests to foreign missions in Uganda for massive military assistance involving foreign soldiers and arms. The declaration itself was signed by 13 ministers some of whom must have done so in absentia since they were nowhere near Entebbe on that day. One minister took to his heels after the arrest of his 5 colleagues. It is fair to say that the signing of the declaration was not quite voluntary.

In this intimidating atmosphere, Obote set up a Commission of Inquiry into the Congo gold allegations on 28th Feb. It would have of course been suicide for any person to come forward and give evidence against a Prime Minister who had taken over all powers of government, suspended the Constitution and even imprisoned his colleagues. Furthermore, he instructed the Commission that evidence that would adversely affect the reputation of any person or reflect upon his character or conduct would not be received ! (What was then the purpose of the Commission, I ask ?)

On 3rd March, Obote made a TV and radio announcement during which he directly accused Sir Edward Muteesa with trumped-up charges of having called on some foreign diplomats to supply him (Muteesa) with troops in order to invade Uganda. He also accused him of dereliction of duty by failing to sign the "lost counties" Referendum Act, 1964; failure to sign the Act setting out the Buganda/Bunyoro boundaries, 1965; and failure to perform the official opening of the session of Parliament on 15th November 1965. These were the justifications Obote gave for suspending the Constitution and abolition of the offices of President and Vice-President.

TO BE CONTNUED

From: Johnnie Muwanga-Zake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SV: RE: SV: [FedsNet] RE: SV: Re: [Northernlightnet] Museveni success game is done!
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 03:22:55 -0700 (PDT)

Mr Ocaya pOcure,
First - what led to Obote being told to remove his govt. from Buganda?
Second - it would seem that Obote did not have the constitutional power to remove a President, then Muteesa II (RIP). If sending Obote off Buganda was bad, it was worse to overthrow a president and exile him, especially if in your view sending Obote off Buganda soil meant that he was a foreigner. I.e., was Muteesa II a foreigner too?

Ocaya pOcure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Oryema,

Please do not read historical events and interpret them as a novice, because we all read that OBOTE was told under no certain term to REMOVE HIS GOVERNMENT FROM BUGANDA SOIL. This can easily clearly be interpreted that OBOTE WAS AND IS AN ALIEN. Therefore, I kindly request you to talk to me as not your peer but some sort of a person from Acoliland village boy who have read Ugandan history although I never live or witnessed some of the said historical events of Uganda!

Mark you, therefore that I am not ready to be path on the back by anybody in this or any other forum as you seem to expect from some quarters. But I am stating the events as they evolved meanwhile you expect me to stuck on your yoke of the only wrong person in Uganda politics is OBOTE as a way you were brought up to propagate! About Constitutional Democratic Federalism in Uganda, I think you should count on me. I support Pure Federalism in Uganda, but not the one which M7 and his cahoots in Mengo are trying to decieve us with, which you dearly call KIFEDERO or endorse under the night meanwhile in day time you talk to us a different tongue!

My brother Oryema, let us not forget that the history of Uganda had not started with OBOTE but long before he was born. I have to remind you about the “ An Ethnic Majority Groups Syndrome,” which was even used by the British colonialism when they came to colonised Uganda, which itself became the Benchmark of the current genocide in the country to called Uganda! Why are we other Ugandans not whinny like wild horses because of this wrong political OMEN of our country? Oryema what is your thinking about northern Uganda – your own root?



Bye



Ocaya p’Ocure



_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/

_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

Reply via email to