The London Bombs, The
Rogue Network And
Iran
By Webster
G. Tarpley
7-12-5
- WASHINGTON, DC -- Last
week's London explosions carry the characteristic features of a
state-sponsored, false flag, synthetic terror provocation by networks
within the British intelligence services MI-5, MI-6, the Home Office,
and the Metropolitan Police Special Branch who are favorable to a wider
Anglo-American aggressive war in the Middle East, featuring especially
an early pre-emptive attack on Iran, with a separate option on North
Korea also included. With the London attacks, the Anglo-American
invisible government adds another horrendous crime to its own dossier.
But this time, their operations appear imperfect, especially in regard
to the lack (so far) of a credible patsy group which, by virtue of its
ethnicity, could direct popular anger against one of the invisible
government's targets. So far, the entire attribution of the London
crimes depends on what amounts to an anonymous posting in an obscure,
hitherto unknown, secular Arabic-language chatrooms in the state of
Maryland, USA. But, based on this wretched shred of pseudo-evidence,
British Prime Minister Tony Blair who has surely heard of a group called
the Irish Republican Army, which bombed London for more than a decade
has not hesitated to ascribe the murders to "Islam," and seems to be
flirting with total martial law under the Civil Contingencies Act. We
are reminded once again of how he earned his nickname of Tony
Bliar.
-
- SCOTLAND YARD KNEW IN ADVANCE
-
- That the British Government knew in advance that
blasts would occur is not open to rational doubt. Within hours of the
explosions, Israeli Army Radio was reporting that "Scotland Yard [London
police headquarters] had intelligence warnings of the attacks a short
time before they occurred." This report, repeated by IsraelNN.com, added
that "the Israeli Embassy in London was notified in advance, resulting
in Foreign Minister Binyamin Netanyahu remaining in his hotel room
rather than make his way to the hotel adjacent to the site of the first
explosion, a Liverpool Street train station, where he was to address an
economic summit." This report is attributed to "unconfirmed reliable
sources." At around the same time, the Associated Press issued a wire
asserting that "British police told the Israeli Embassy in London
minutes before Thursday's explosions that they had received warnings of
possible terror attacks in the city," according to "a senior Israeli
official." This wire specifies that "just before the blasts, Scotland
Yard called the security officer at the Israeli Embassy to say that they
had received warnings of possible attacks."
-
- According to eyewitness reports from London, BBC
claimed between 8:45 and some minutes after 10 AM that the incidents in
the Underground were the result of an electrical power surge, or
alternatively of a collision. Foreign bigwigs, presumably not just
Netanyahu, were warned, while London working people continued to stream
into the subway. These reports have been denied, repudiated, sanitized,
and expunged from news media websites by the modern Orwellian Thought
Police, but they have been archived by analysts who learned on 9/11 and
other occasions that key evidence in state-sponsored terror crimes tends
to filter out during the first minutes and hours, during the critical
interval when the controlled media are assimilating the cover story
peddled by complicit moles within the ministries. These reports are not
at all damaging to Israel, but are devastating for British domestic
security organs. An alternative version peddled by Stratfor.com, namely
that the Israelis warned Scotland Yard, is most probably spurious but
still leaves the British authorities on the hook. Which Scotland Yard
official made the calls? Identify that official, and you have bagged a
real live rogue network mole.
-
- Another more general element of foreknowledge can be
seen in the fact reported by Isikoff and Hosenball of Newsweek that,
since about November 2004, the US FBI, but not other US agencies, has
been refusing to use the London Underground.
-
- Operations like these are generally conduited through
the government bureaucracies under the cover of a drill or exercise
which closely resembles the terror operation itself. So it was with
Amalgam Virgo and the multiple exercises held on 9/11, as I show in my
9/11 Synthetic Terror Made in USA (Joshua Tree CA: Progressive Press,
2005). So it was with the Hinckley attempt to assassinate Ronald Reagan,
when a presidential succession exercise was scheduled for the next day,
as I showed in my George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography (1992; reprint
by Progressive Press, 2004). An uncannily similar maneuver allows the
necessary work to be done on official computers and on company time,
while warding off the inquisitive glances and questions of curious
co-workers at adjoining computer consoles.
-
- THE COVER STORY TERROR DRILL
-
- Such a parallel drill was not lacking in the London
case. On the evening of July 7, BBC Five, a news and sports radio
program, carried an interview with a certain former Scotland Yard
official named Peter Power who related that his firm, Visor Consulting,
had been doing an anti-terror-bombing drill in precisely the Underground
stations and at the precise times when the real explosions went off.
Peter Power and Visor had been subcontractors for the drill; Power
declined to name the prime contractors. Small wonder that Blair, in his
first official report to the Commons on July 11, went out of his way to
rule out a board of inquiry to probe these tragic events.
-
- Tony Blair may be eyeing the advantages of emergency
rule for a discredited lame duck like himself, but the British people
may have a different view. The alternative is clear: on the one hand is
the American response after 9/11, marked by submissive and credulous
gullibility in regard to the fantastic official story of what had
happened. On the other hand is the militant and intelligent Spanish
response after March 11, 2004, marked by powerful mass mobilization and
righteous anger against politicians who sought to manipulate the people
and sell a distorted account of events. Which way will the British
people go? Straws in the wind suggest that the British response may be
closer to the Spanish, although it may develop more slowly because of
the lack of mass organization and related factors. If this is the case,
Tony Blair, Jack Straw, and the rest of the malodorous "New Labor"
crypto-Thatcherites will be out the window.
-
- My thesis is that the London explosions represent a
form of communication on the past of the transatlantic Anglo-American
financier faction with Bush, Blair, and the heads of state and
government assembled at Gleneagles, Scotland for the G-8 meeting on the
day of the blast. The London deaths were designed to deliver an
ultimatum in favor of early war with Iran. Here a word of clarification
may be necessary. The demonization of Bush by his many enemies, while
understandable, risks blurring the basic realities of power in the US
and UK. Since the Bay of Pigs and the Kennedy assassination (to go back
no further than that), we have been aware of a secret team. During the
Iran-contra era, the same phenomenon was referred to as an invisible,
secret or parallel government. This is still the matrix of most
large-scale terrorism. The questions arises for some: do Bush and Cheney
tell the invisible government what to do, or does the invisible
government treat the visible office holders as puppets and expendable
assets? To ask the question is to answer it: Bush, Cheney & Co. are
the expendable puppets. The explanation of terror is not Bush MIHOP, as
some seem to argue, but rather invisible government MIHOP, an altogether
more dire proposition.
-
- How then does the invisible faction communicate with
the public mouthpieces? Given the violence of the power relations
involved, we can be sure that it is not a matter of sending out engraved
invitations announcing that the honor of Bush's presence is requested at
the launching of an attack on Iran. Rather, the invisible and violent
rogue network communicates with Bush, Blair, and others by means
coherent with their aggressive nature as they did on 9/11. Bush, of
course, is a weak and passive tenant of the White House whose instinct
is to do virtually nothing beyond the day-to-day routine.
-
- We therefore need to note that the London blasts come
after two months of vigorous and impatient prodding of Bush by the
invisible government. On May 11, a small plane almost reached the White
House before it was turned away, while the Congress, the Supreme Court,
and the White House (but not the Pentagon, the Treasury, etc.) were
evacuated amid scenes of panic. The White House went to red alert, but
Bush was not informed until it was all over, and was riding his bicycle
in the woods near Greenbelt, Maryland. Flares were dropped over the
Brookland district and Takoma Park, MD. The resemblance of all this to a
classic coup scenario was evident. On May 18, a live hand grenade, which
turned out to be a dud, landed near Bush as he spoke at a rally in
Tbilisi, Georgia.
-
- On June 29, the approach of another small plane led to
an evacuation of the Congress and the Capitol, again with scenes of
panic. On the afternoon of July 2, no fewer than three small planes came
close to Bush's Camp David retreat in the Catoctin Mountains of
Maryland; this story was suspiciously relegated to the local news page
of the Washington Post. The details of these incidents are of little
interest; what counts is the objective reality of a pattern. These
incidents also provide background for Bush's unbalanced behavior on July
5 at Gleneagles, when he crashed into a policeman while riding on his
bicycle. Then came the London blasts on July 7.
-
- What is it that the invisible government wants Bush
and Blair to do? Scott Ritter announced last January that Bush had
issued an order to prepare an attack on Iran for the month of June.
According to a well-informed retired CIA analyst I spoke with on July 3,
this order actually told US commanders to be ready to attack Iran by the
end of June. This project of war with Iran is coherent with most of what
we know about the intentions of the US-UK rogue faction, and thus
provides the immediate background for the London explosions. The Bush
administration and the Blair cabinet have failed to deliver decisive
military action, and the invisible government is exceedingly
impatient.
-
- One way to increase the pressure on Iran would be to
implicate a group of Iranian fanatic patsies in the London bombings.
This would not be difficult; in fact, as I show in 9/11 Synthetic
Terror, the British capital, referred to during the 1990s as
Londonistan, is home to the largest concentration of Arab and Islamic
patsy groups in the entire world in such infamous locations as Finsbury
mosque and Brixton mosque; these groups are known to have enjoyed de
facto recruiting privileges in Her Majesty's Prisons. But perhaps an
Iranian patsy group would be too obvious at this time. More likely may
be the sinking of a US warship in the Gulf by a third country, duly
attributed to Iran.
-
- In a recent speech, Dr. Ephraim Asculai of Tel Aviv
University made two main points: first, that there is no military
solution to the Iranian nuclear issue, and second, that there is no such
thing as a point of no return in nuclear weapons development. Dr.
Asculai showed that South Africa, Sweden, and other nations had turned
away from deploying A-bombs well after having acquired the ability to
produce them. Dr. Asculai is evidently arguing against widespread
tendencies in the US-UK-Israeli strategic community who are whipping up
hysteria around the notion that Iran is now indeed approaching exactly
such a point of no return.
-
- For her part, Miss Rice of the State Department has
now declared that it will no longer be sufficient for Iran to turn away
from nuclear weapons production; the entire Iranian program for nuclear
energy production will also have to be dismantled, in her view. Such
maximalism makes a negotiated solution impossible as long as the current
Washington group holds power.
-
- SCO: US GET OUT OF CENTRAL ASIA
-
- The US, UK and Israel have been on the brink of war
with Iran for at least a year, and the rogue network is generally aware
that time is not on its side. There is also an important new development
which threatens the ability of the Anglo-Americans to wage war. On July
5, the summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which
brings together China, Russia, Uzbekistan, Krygyzia, Kazakhstan, and
Tajikistan plus new members India, Pakistan, and Iran, issued a call for
the United States to vacate the bases seized in the autumn of 2001 under
the cover of the 9/11 emergency and the looming invasion of Afghanistan.
The parties to this call represent about half of the world's population.
This demand was immediately rejected by the State Department, but
veteran Russian Eurasian expert Yevgeny Primakov crowed that for the
first time a formula had been agreed to by which the US would be ejected
from this region. The US presence goes back to the Bush-Putin emergency
hotwire talks of September 11, 2001, when Putin, seeing that the madmen
had seized control in Washington, dropped Russian objections to a US
intrusion into the former Soviet republics of central Asia. The US-UK
can attack Iran from Iraq in the west, from Afghanistan in the east, and
from Qatar in the south, but without the Uzbek and Kyrgyz bases, the
Anglo-American ability to attack from the north as well will be severely
limited. The SCO states are also concerned about US-backed "color
revolutions" on the recent Georgian and Ukrainian models, traditionally
known as CIA "people power" revolutions, being used to destabilize their
governments. To make matters worse for Washington and London, Kazakhstan
is a few months away from opening an oil pipeline to China, which will
diminish the US-UK ability to use their Gulf presence to blackmail
Beijing. Washington and London are also dismayed by the pro-Iranian
overtures in various fields being made by their Shiite puppets in
Baghdad.
-
- And what of the report in the Washington Post of July
11, which claims that US and UK planners are now contemplating a sharp
reduction in the US forces in Iraq? The most plausible explanation is
that this is pure disinformation, similar to news blips issued by both
Hitler and Stalin in May and June of 1941. It should also be noted that
the British plan explicitly provides for most of the forces now at Basra
to go to Afghanistan, where they would be positioned for operations
against Iran, or into central Asia.
-
- Generally, the invisible government appears dismayed
by its loss of momentum and the constant erosion of the political
position of its asset, Bush. 110,000 US factory workers lost their jobs
in June, the worst total in a year and a half: auto and textiles are
collapsing. The housing bubble may also be nearing its end, with the
bankruptcy of Fannie Mae on the near-term agenda. World derivatives have
officially reached $300 trillion, with JP Morgan Chase holding the
largest single portfolio. The one virtuoso performance of July 7 was
that of the Federal Reserve, Bank of England, and European Central Bank,
which flooded equity and capital markets with liquidity through such
vehicles as the Plunge Protection Team (PPT), turning a big Wall Street
loss into a small gain.
-
- During the recent Reopen 9/11 tour of 8 European
cities, Jimmy Walter repeatedly forecast that the general predicament of
the Bush regime and the US financier faction would lead to another
large-scale terror attack before the end of 2005; this has now occurred,
and there is no end in sight. The tide of US public opinion has now
definitively turned against the Iraq war and to some degree against
Bush, as all major polls demonstrate. Notable is the 42% affirmative
response to the Zogby International question as to whether, if it could
be proved that Bush lied to launch the Iraq war, he should be impeached.
Larry Franklin of the Wolfowitz-Feith neocon apparatus has been indicted
for divulging US secrets, and the American-Israeli Public Affairs
Council has been raided twice; further indictments are expected. Karl
Rove has now been revealed as the source of the Valerie Plame leak,
making Rove and perhaps other White House officials fair game for
federal indictment. The Niger yellowcake forgeries and the Chalabi state
secrets cases are still pending to say nothing of two stolen elections
and the 9/11 Septembergate itself. All these factors incline the rogue
network to seek an improvement in their situation through a flight
forward to a wider war in Iran. Those who stand to lose most by such an
Iranian adventure must now mobilize to make Mr. Bush's second term as
eventful as Nixon's second term turned out to be in
1974.
|
The Mulindwas Communication Group
"With
Yoweri Museveni, Uganda is in
anarchy"
Groupe de communication Mulindwas
"avec Yoweri Museveni, l'Ouganda est dans
l'anarchie"
|
