|
Staging
An Attack To
Fix The Coverup
Of Another
From LibertyForum Post By
"Impatient"
7-23-5
- This latest "attack" is supposed to correct some
faults in the first without causing further mayhem.
-
- What has given them the most trouble with the first
attack? Their choice of patsies.
-
- They assumed that a loose Muslim connection would be
enough to persuade everyone that these lads from Leeds were suicide
bombers. But rather than clinch it for the planners, it backfired and
the most common and reasonable question that everyone has about the
suicide bomber fiction was invoked: How could young men who were not
religious fanatics, who were educated, decent fellows, with loving
families, and bright futures how could they kill themselves and
others?
-
- Another unforeseen problem was the effusive praise
coming from Efraim Halevi that described the London bombings as
"near-perfect". Too many people could not get a picture in their minds
of four young men with rucksacks able to so perfectly execute
simultaneous bombings. It caused doubts that have not been quelled. Too
many people saw the hand of the Mossad and its affiliates in the earlier
bombing because the four "bombers with rucksacks" did not evoke the
necessary sophisticated timing, operational capacity, and scope.
-
- The latest "attack" is supposed to reaffirm that young
men with rucksacks are perfectly capable of a simultaneous triggering of
devices, a demonstrable fearlessness in the face of death, and a
disregard for the lives of others, even women with babies.
-
- Because all four bombs malfunctioned this time round,
it tells us that the bombers are not the Mossad or any other
intelligence agency because 100% malfunction is very unprofessional, it
may mean that their first bombing was just good luck, not
expertise.
-
- While the rucksacks in the first bombing have not
turned up, this new bombing tells us once again that four young men
carried bomb-laden packs aboard the trains and [would have] died when
they detonated.
-
- The investigation has not proceeded methodically. The
whole question of how the bombing was done and who did it was
effectively squelched when they began looking for the needle in the
haystack the CCTV films. Without knowledge of the type of bombs,
their power, placement, and detonation, there could be absolutely no
reason to begin looking at CCTV tapes. They could not know what to look
for without the certainty that the bombs were carried on, and not placed
beforehand.
-
- It is significant that of all the thousands of hours
of CCTV tape they have examined, the only tape they seem to have of the
young men from Leeds does not come from London at all! In the pictures
we have seen the lads are in Luton, 25 minutes away. Unless they can
show us the "bombers" going their separate ways and boarding three or
four different trains I will not believe that the young men ever made it
to London. Seeing them together at Luton means nothing if they cannot be
placed getting on the trains at exactly the right time to take them the
right distance from King's Cross before they explode.
-
- In the case of the 7/7 bombings, going straightaway to
the video tapes was very premature and irrational. It can only mean that
they knew what they would find because they had planted the "evidence".
It makes no sense to begin looking at thousands of hours of video tape
from as far away as Luton without any idea of what you are looking for.
What could it be? Rucksacks, packages, briefcases, baby strollers, gym
bags? Suspicous looking people of a certain race? And remember that the
first story was that at least 24 people had been involved.
-
- What would be the motivation to look at the tapes from
Luton? Did they also look at tapes from video cameras at the airports
and bus stations? It would seem to be just as reasonable to look at
those tapes as looking at Luton. And why is the Luton tape the only
tape?
-
- Luton is interesting because an office of ICTS (the
Israeli security firm) is about a mile from a Thameslink station. ICTS
is actually located in the Luton and Dunstable NHS Hospital. It seems a
little odd that this firm that handles security for the Stansted airport
would be located at the Hospital.
-
- Just like the problem with 9/11 and Madrid - there
were no hijackers and no bombers to film. They tried to get around that
on 7/7 by getting some patsies to photograph. They did not leave it to
chance, for those picked had to be disposed of as though they had been
killed in the blasts. Never Mind the "Evidence," Who Planted it? The
"investigation" that led to the Leeds four was not a real investigation
because the videotape evidence was "planted" and the investigation was
"led" to find it. People seem to overlook this fact and assume that
there were real clues that led the "investigators" to check the video
cameras in Luton. Luton is distant from London and a real investigation
would have no more reason to check those cameras than they would the
cameras at Stansted or Heathrow or the bus stations or Thameslink
stations in other directions. They vaguely justify looking northward and
in Leeds because one mother called about her missing son - one mother
out of 120,000 calls!
-
- Just like the 19 photographs of the suicide hijackers,
we never ask where those came from and how the FBI got them. The FBI
admits there was not a single piece of paper to indicate the planning or
knowledge of 9/11 but we are to believe that pictures of 19 hijackers
sort of "turn up" very quickly after 9/11.
-
- But people seem to begin their questions too far down
the road, away from the initial and thoroughly incriminating
points.
-
- Wherever there is "planted" evidence it means the
perpetrators have planted it to divert honest investigators. To
investigate the planted evidence as though it is real is to miss the
opportunity of catching the fix at the beginning. It is those who plant
the evidence who are responsible for the crime.
-
- The real perpetrators give themselves away by going
directly to Luton to find their video. What are the chances of that?
They went to Luton before there was any forensic investigation at the
bomb sites. They were off to Luton even before they had removed all the
body parts from the blasts - before they had any evidence that rucksacks
were used to bring the bombs onto the trains - they were on their way to
Luton to find the pictures of the lads carrying rucksacks and they found
them.
|
The Mulindwas Communication Group
"With
Yoweri Museveni, Uganda is in
anarchy"
Groupe de communication Mulindwas
"avec Yoweri Museveni, l'Ouganda est dans
l'anarchie"
|
