You have been sent this message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a courtesy of 
washingtonpost.com 
 
 The Next Chinese Threat
 
 By Sebastian Mallaby
 
  Last week congressional bullying drove China to abandon its bid for Unocal, a 
small California-based oil company. Anyone inclined to celebrate should focus 
on the likely sequel: China will redouble its efforts to buy energy and other 
resources in shaky developing countries. This will undermine Western efforts to 
promote transparency and fight corruption there, damaging U.S. interests and 
values far more than a Unocal takeover.
 
 To see why this is so, begin with China's motives. China wants to control 
supplies of oil and other commodities because it's scared of price shocks; 
owning oil or other mineral reserves provides anti-shock insurance. As Chinese 
economists argue, their economy is extremely vulnerable to external shocks 
because it's extremely open. The Unocal defeat is not going to stanch China's 
drive to buy foreign resources.
 
 China has two ways to do that. It can buy Western resource companies: That was 
the Unocal strategy. Or it can do deals in resource-rich developing countries, 
which tend to be plagued with corruption, human rights abuses and other 
unsavory practices. To cite just two of many examples, China has invested in 
Sudan and Zimbabwe, propping up both countries' unspeakable dictatorships.
 
 As far as Western interests are concerned, these Chinese resource investments 
may sound like a marginal threat. But they go to the heart of the most 
promising growth area in development policy. Old development was based on aid 
and trade, but there's a limit to how much aid poor countries can absorb, and 
trade isn't a panacea. New development adds a third tool: a focus on governance 
and transparency in poor countries and also, crucially, among the outside 
governments and firms that deal with them.
 
 Why are outsiders so important? Because the insiders -- the poor countries 
themselves -- face a sort of Catch-22. You can urge a corrupt government to 
reform itself, but its own corruption constitutes an obstacle. You can dream up 
development projects to promote better governance: training for judges, civil 
service reform, budget transparency laws and so on. But how do you administer a 
project to improve public administration when administration itself is the 
problem?
 
 Because of this Catch-22, outsiders have to begin by overhauling their own 
practices and institutions. In the past five years or so, there's been 
remarkable progress in this field -- much of it driven by newcomers to the 
development scene such as Global Witness, a terrific activist group in London. 
Global Witness and its allies are on the brink of persuading the development 
establishment to give their agenda the priority it deserves. But their momentum 
may be wrecked by China's post-Unocal resource strategy.
 
 Global Witness's successes range from oil to timber to diamonds and from 
Indonesia to Angola. On oil, the group has argued that while you can't wish 
away oil corruption in a country such as Angola, you can require Western oil 
companies to publish what they pay to the Angolan government so that citizens 
have at least a theoretical chance to complain if it gets looted. This argument 
has fathered something called the Extractive Industries Transparency 
Initiative, a voluntary disclosure code sponsored by the British government.
 
 Global Witness has also pushed a good idea on diamonds. You can't always stop 
limb-chopping rebels from capturing African diamond mines, the group has 
argued, but you can at least try to prevent Westerners from buying their gems 
and hence financing their butchery. This argument is at the heart of the 
Kimberley Process, a scheme to track diamonds as they move from legitimate 
mines to sorting centers in Antwerp to your local jeweler; the aim is to ensure 
that the next earring you buy won't finance gangs of killers. This activist 
idea has also won the eager support of several Western governments.
 
 Most recently, Global Witness has been going after firms that make payments to 
dubious security forces. Again, you can't realistically expect to turn 
Indonesia's army into a temple of enlightenment, but you can at least hope that 
Western companies don't pay for its corruption and brutality. Global Witness 
claims that the Indonesian operation of Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, a U.S. 
mining firm, has paid large sums to individual police and military officers, 
including $247,705 to a general with an uncertain human rights record. The 
group argues that international accounting standards should in the future 
require multinational companies to publish the details of their payments to 
security forces.
 
 So the field of internationally driven anti-corruption disclosure is buzzing. 
But the weakness of these schemes is that they require everyone's cooperation. 
If American and European companies reform their behavior, this isn't going to 
be enough. Corrupt thugs in the poor world will just do deals instead with 
companies that don't care about development or human rights -- such as 
companies from China.
 
 Hence the big post-Unocal danger. China is going to be even hungrier for 
resource deals than it was before, and the attempt to force higher standards of 
transparency in poor countries is going to suffer. On a recent trip to China, I 
asked several Westernized professors about their country's support for Sudan's 
genocidal rulers. Not only did they betray no sympathy for Global Witness's 
world view, they weren't even aware that Chinese involvement in Sudan might be 
an international issue.
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 Would you like to send this article to a friend? Go to 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/emailafriend?contentId=AR2005080700884&sent=no&referrer=emailarticle
 
 

Visit washingtonpost.com today for the latest in:

News - http://www.washingtonpost.com/?referrer=emailarticle

Politics - 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/politics/?referrer=emailarticle

Sports - 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/sports/?referrer=emailarticle

Entertainment - 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/artsandliving/entertainmentguide/?referrer=emailarticle

Travel - 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/artsandliving/travel/?referrer=emailarticle

Technology - 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/technology/?referrer=emailarticle




Want the latest news in your inbox? Check out washingtonpost.com's e-mail 
newsletters:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?node=admin/email&referrer=emailarticle

Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive
c/o E-mail Customer Care
1515 N. Courthouse Road
Arlington, VA 22201 

© 2004 The Washington Post Company

_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

Reply via email to