from the NEW YORK AMSTERDAM NEWS:
New Orleans: A Disaster Waiting to Happen
by George E. Curry
NNPA columnist
Originally posted 9/1/2005

I am angry. I am angry at the mayor of New Orleans. I am angry at the
governor of Louisiana. I am angry at the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA). I am angry at the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), now
part of the Department of Homeland Security. I am angry at George W. Bush. I
am angry because they were warned last November that New Orleans was one of
the Disasters Waiting to Happen  and did nothing about it. Consequently,
hundreds, if not thousands, of people are dead. Needlessly.
In an eerie prediction of what happened as a result of Hurricane Katrina, an
article titled, What if Hurricane Ivan Had Not Missed New Orleans? was
published in the Natural Hazards Observer, a major journal headquartered at
the University of Colorado in Boulder. It was written by Shirley Laska of
the Center for Hazards Assessment, Response and Technology at the University
of New Orleans. In other words, this was an article written by a reputable
author in a reputable national publication that should have been read by
people involved in disaster relief. If they had taken heed, many of the dead
in New Orleans would be alive today.
Under the headline, What if Ivan Had Hit New Orleans? the author wrote,
New Orleans was spared this time, but had it not been, Hurricane Ivan would
have:
* Pushed a 17-foot storm surge into Lake Pontchartrain;
* Caused the levees between the lake and the city to overtop and fill the
city bowl with water from lake levee to river levee, in some places as
deep as 20 feet;
* Flooded the north shore suburbs as much as seven miles inland; and
* Inundated inhabited areas south of the Mississippi River.

Up to 80 percent of the structures in these flooded areas would have been
severely damaged from wind and water. The potential for such extensive
flooding and the resulting damage is the result of a levee system that is
unable to keep up with the increasing flood threats from a rapidly eroding
coastline and thus unable to protect the ever-subsiding landscape.
Until I read this article, I had said one of the positive things that I
hoped would come out of this disaster is that relief experts would realize
that they need to make special provisions for the poor, elderly and
homeless. In essence, I gave them the benefit of the doubt. Now, however, I
realize that there is no benefit in doubt.
The warning was there in black and white:
For those without means, the medically challenged, residents without
personal transportation, and the homeless, evacuation requires significant
assistance.
Laska spelled it out in even more detail.
During Hurricane Ivan in 2004, she continues, Residents who did not have
personal transportation were unable to evacuate even if they wanted to.
Approximately 120,000 residents (51,000 housing units x 2.4 persons/unit) do
not have cars.
A proposal made after the evacuation from Hurricane Georges to use public
transit buses to assist in their evacuation out of the city was not
implemented for Ivan. If Ivan had struck New Orleans directly it is
estimated that 40-60,000 residents of the area would have perished.
The additional problem of people having the means to leave, but refusing to
do so was addressed in the article.
Researchers have estimated that prior to a big one, approximately 700,000
residents of the greater New Orleans area (out of 1.2 million) would
evacuate, Laska wrote. In the case of Hurricane Ivan, officials estimate
that up to 600,000 evacuated from metropolitan New Orleans between daybreak
on Monday, September 13 and noon on Wednesday, September 13, when the storm
turned and major roads started to clear
The fact that 600,000 residents evacuated means an equal number did not.
Recent evacuation surveys show that two thirds of nonevacuees with the means
to evacuate chose not to leave because they felt safe in their homes. Other
nonevacuees with means relied on a cultural tradition of not leaving or were
discouraged by negative experiences with past evacuations.
Those that dismiss environmentalists as kooks, should pay special attention
to the observations about marshes.
Loss of the coastal marshes that dampened earlier storm surges puts the
city at increasing risk to hurricanes, the article noted. Eighty years of
substantial river leveeing has prevented spring flood deposition of new
layers of sediment into the marshes, and a similarly lengthy period of marsh
excavation activities related to oil and gas exploration and transportation
canals for the petrochemical industry have threatened marsh integrity.
Using the Hurricane Ivan model to predict what would happen if a major
hurricane struck New Orleans, Laska wrote: Should this disaster become a
reality, it would undoubtedly be one of the greatest disasters, if not the
greatest, to hit the United States, with estimated costs exceeding 100
billion dollars. According to the Red Cross, such an event could be even
more devastating than a major earthquake in California. Survivors would have
to endure conditions never before experienced in a North American disaster.
It ended, The hurricane scenario for New Orleans that these conveying risks
portend is almost unimaginable. Hurricane Ivan had the potential to make the
unthinkable a reality. Next time New Orleans may not be so fortunate.

George E. Curry is editor-in-chief of the NNPA News Service and
BlackPressUSA.com. He appears on National Public Radio (NPR) three times a
week as part of News and Notes with Ed Gordon. In addition, his radio
commentary is syndicated each week by Capitol Radio News Service
(301/588-1993). To contact Curry or to book him for a speaking engagement,
go to his Web site, www.georgecurry.com.
 
 The Mulindwas Communication Group
"With Yoweri Museveni, Uganda is in anarchy"
            Groupe de communication Mulindwas
"avec Yoweri Museveni, l'Ouganda est dans l'anarchie"

_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

Reply via email to