Britain’s colonial lies exposed

By Rosemary Ekosso

COLONIAL history, seen from the side of the colonists, can be summarised as 
follows: I came, I saw, I conquered. Then I lied about it.

The BBC radio 4 website has a story called "Rigging Nigeria".

I have not actually listened to the documentary, but I was intrigued, as you 
might imagine, by the title. The website claims that the British rigged the 
elections in Nigeria in 1960 to counter the threat of communism. 

You will have heard the recent outcry about the Nigerian elections and how 
deeply flawed they allegedly were. I decided to do a bit of digging, and came 
up with a mother lode of corroboration of this tale of British duplicity in 
dealing with its colony. 

All things are revealed in the fullness of time, in spite of official secret 
Acts, 100-year gagging orders and that sort of thing. 

I have been struck, in writing this, about just how little I really know about 
what went on in colonial times. 

I think this is dangerous ignorance on my part, and I have resolved to do 
something about it . . . starting with force-feeding you the results of my 
peregrinations in the ether. 

To return to the mother lode of information, I went to this website and found 
an online book by a man called Harold Smith, who reveals how he saw the rigging 
of the elections in Nigeria in 1960. 

I shall not spoil Mr Smith’s tale by commenting on it; I shall just give you 
excerpts so that you will want to read it for yourselves. 

As far as I am concerned, for the purposes of this article, this is the most 
interesting thing Mr Smith has to say:

"My main qualification for demolishing the myth that the British created viable 
democracies out of savage tribes only to see the ungrateful and greedy natives 
quickly revert to their tribalistic ways was my personal involvement in these 
events. 

"This is the story of evil committed by kind, nice, decent British politicians. 
They sought to keep Britain from bankruptcy and found a solution in the 
mineral-rich Empire on the point of independence. It was necessary to bend the 
rules and, sadly, in due course the rules were totally forgotten. 

"Those who got in the way were innocent like the colonial peoples, but both had 
to be dealt with quite harshly." 

Then in Chapter 1, he goes on to make what I think is a very interesting 
statement, especially from a former colonial officer:

"Not only is Africa denigrated by the carefully nurtured fairy tale fashioned 
for the most part in Oxford, but with skill and cunning the British image is 
carefully burnished and enhanced. 

"When did Britain itself become a democracy, if it has yet achieved that state? 
With universal male suffrage in 1884 or when all women got the vote in 1928? 

"Britain’s democratic traditions are of more recent origin than most are aware. 

"When the British removed themselves from Nigeria in 1960 (though in truth they 
did not really surrender power to the African people) there was not even 
universal suffrage, as only a minority of the country’s women — those in the 
South — were entitled to vote. 

"As for tribalism, that well-worn cliché of colonial histories, the 
pre-colonial societies found in Nigeria were quite sophisticated and could be 
seen as city-states or nations. And it is the British who have been at war with 
rebellious Irish tribes for centuries. 

"Can any savagery in Africa equal the Belsens of civilised Western Europe? And 
the tribal skirmishes often quoted as an excuse for the British armed 
occupation, pale to insignificance beside the massive bloody conflicts between 
the European powers. 

"I refer, of course, to the two Great Wars of 1914-1918 and 1939-1945."

Then he comes to the heart of the matter:

"When I suggest that the British government meddled with the democratic 
elections in Nigeria, I write as an authority. I was chosen by his Excellency 
the Governor General, Sir James Robertson, to spearhead a covert operation to 
interfere with the elections. 

"The laws of Nigeria were a sham and largely window-dressing to conceal, not 
mirror the reality of where power lay. I drafted some of those laws.

"I look at that in the light of the recent outcry about Nigeria’s allegedly 
rigged elections, and I think cheating and dishonesty are a question of 
perspective, and that in this regard, while I do not wish to be seen as 
excusing corruption in any way, our greatest critics live in enormous glass 
mansions."

Mr Smith continues:

"Unfortunately, most of the early scholarly works on Nigeria did not choose to 
raise the curtain to see what was happening backstage, so that all too often 
the analysis is curiously superficial and lacking in bite or significance. Of 
course, academics or others who were seeking to teach or work in Nigeria, not 
only before but after Independence, would need to be very careful not to bite 
the hand of their colonial masters if they were not to be branded unreliable or 
unsound."

This next one is as revealing to me as the story I read in King Leopold’s Ghost 
about how, to impress upon Congolese chiefs their superior powers, some white 
people used to conceal a live wire in their hand when shaking hands with the 
chiefs so that the chiefs would receive a jolt of electricity when they took 
the white people's hands.

Sometimes a labour officer would awake from a nap himself and creep up on his 
sleeping messenger and roar in his ear giving the poor man a fit.

"Wake up, you lazy bastard," he would shout.

Or they did in 1955. As Independence approached in 1960 African staff began to 
be treated more politely, and "wog", "coon", "black monkey", and other racist 
language went underground.

There are days when I think that such language should never have gone 
underground. 

It makes it that much clearer when you know what people really think. 

This was made very clear in a comment on one of my articles about Zimbabwe, in 
which the commenter, quite likely one of the white farmers (or possibly his 
brain dead offspring) who were divested of what they thought was their land 
referred to Africans variously as Zamboons, etc. 

Yet we were acutely aware of how privileged we were to live so well, while the 
many thousands of people in Lagos, who were paying for Ikoyi, our flat and our 
salaries out of their miserable wages, were living in mud huts for the most 
part, without running water and proper sanitation. 

When the rains came they would be flooded. In no way would we minimise the 
discomfort or suffering of people living in such difficult circumstances. Yet 
in spite of these privations, the people from these shacks were all clean and 
neatly dressed. 

Their children, too, were clearly well taken care of and loved. When we think 
of the nauseating racism which permeates white societies and compare it with 
the tolerance, kindness, good manners and hospitality which we received without 
exception during our five years in Nigeria, we feel ashamed of our compatriots.

The Nigerian people may have been poor in those years, yet they had qualities 
any civilised society could envy. 

We Europeans would drive out from Ikoyi in our posh cars, grim faced and tense, 
and see those proud erect people full of gaiety and laughter. I often felt that 
we had forgotten how to live naturally but they still had that secret.

Now, this is startling:

"It was fashionable for some expatriates in those days to taunt the Nigerian 
elite with being too clever by half. This was the reaction of people who knew 
themselves to be inferior or inadequate. 

"Often dogged by injustice, poverty and by lack of opportunity, considerable 
numbers of Nigerians — often aided by dedicated Christian missionaries — had 
gained an education and become leaders of considerable stature. And if one 
thought Nigerian men were often brilliant, one only had to meet some Nigerian 
women to be stunned by their high intelligence, perception and wit. 

"It would not surprise me if West Africans proved to be of a higher 
intelligence than many people in Western Europe."

On the much-touted merits of British indirect rule:

"The politics of the colonial regime are employed in the selection, destruction 
and manipulation of the leaders of the native people. 

"Although the idea of indirect rule has become closely identified with Nigeria, 
it is not a new idea as every conquering power exercises its authority using 
existing power structures in the community.

"To this end in Nigeria a highly efficient intelligence service operated both 
through the administration who routinely completed intelligence reports and 
through the army, police and special branch. 

"The Labour Department also played a key role. The major aim of all this is to 
encourage friends of the colonial regime, people who are ‘sound’, that is 
prepared to betray their own people’s interests for personal advancement, and 
to put down irresponsible elements, that is to say nationalist politicians who 
act in their people's interests and cannot be bribed."

On the choice of Nigeria’s post-independence leaders:

"A major proportion of the politicians who made Nigeria notorious for 
corruption after Independence were selected by the British before Independence. 

"The politicians and leaders and men of eminence not chosen were often honest, 
trustworthy and responsible people. Why were these people not brought in by the 
British? The answer is that the British needed people they could control. They 
sometimes selected crooks whom they knew they could control after Independence."

On the origins of corruption in Nigeria:

"Ronald Wraith, in a fascinating study of corruption in Nigeria, fails to 
mention the involvement of the British at all. (Although he does demonstrate 
that corruption was rife in Britain up to the middle of the 19th century.) 

"It does seem a little unfair. After all, although corruption undoubtedly got 
worse after the British left, it was clearly much in evidence while the British 
were in charge. 

"I shall demonstrate later an even more sensational fact. 

"The British not only tolerated and indulged corruption. They actively took 
part at the highest possible levels and instigated it and encouraged it in 
Nigerian politicians, the better to control or blackmail them."

On colonialism:

"I suppose the most corrupt act of all is colonialism itself. What could be 
more corrupt than to steal someone else’s country?"

Echoes of our world today:

"Our world was in a state of chaos. The 17-stone Governor-General of the most 
populous British colony in Africa, in his white uniform and plumed hat, while 
posing as a liberal to visiting VIPs, was secretly rigging elections and 
destroying the very foundations of democracy in the new state which outwardly 
would be the fifth largest democracy in the world. 

"Sir James Robertson, not content with that, was urging his newly-elected 
ministers to loot and pillage the State and make Nigeria’s first great 
nationalist political party, the National Council of Nigeria and the Cameroons 
(NCNC) almost totally dependent for funds on levies and bribes from British and 
other multinational firms which already had a powerful grip on Nigeria’s 
economy."

The truly funny:

"You will be expecting me on this long awaited day," said the Chief Clerk, "to 
regale you with platitudes expressing my gratitude for having been able to work 
with such a splendid body of officials serving Her Britannic Majesty here in 
Nigeria. 

"The truth is that I, as an educated person, have been forced to work under 
generations of stupid, often illiterate expatriates, who were lazy, uneducated, 
patronising, selfish and of no use to anybody." 

At this some of the expatriates began to rise, but the Chief Clerk waved them 
down. 

"I have waited a long time to tell you these truths," he went on. 

"Sit down and listen and learn something from my heart which may yet be of 
service to you."

I leave you now so you can go and download Mr Smith’s absolutely riveting book 
by yourself. 

I am surprised that I have never heard of it before. Any guesses why? 
www.ekosso.com

       
---------------------------------
Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to Yahoo! 
Answers. 
_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/


The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to