From: Fonge 
To: Fonge 
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 9:11 PM
Subject: [camnetwork] Twins unwittingly got married in Britain



Twins unwittingly got married in Britain

By THOMAS WAGNER Associated Press Writer





LONDON-Twins who were separated at birth got married without realizing they 
were brother and sister, a lawmaker said, urging more information be provided 
on birth certificates for adopted children. A court annulled the British 
couple's union after they discovered their true relationship, Lord David Alton 
said. 

"Everyone has a right to knowledge about their lineage, genealogy and identity. 
And if they don't, then it will lead to cases of incest," Alton told The 
Associated Press during a telephone interview Friday. 

Alton first revealed details of the unusual case last month during a five-hour 
debate about a bill that would change regulations about human embryology. 

"I was recently involved in a conversation with a High Court judge who was 
telling me of a case he had dealt with," Alton said according to a transcript 
of the Dec. 10 debate. "It involved the normal birth of twins who were 
separated at birth and adopted by separate parents. 

"They were never told that they were twins. They met later in life and felt an 
inevitable attraction, and the judge had to deal with the consequences of the 
marriage that they entered into and all the issues of their separation." 

Alton gave no additional details and would not reveal the name of the judge who 
told him about the case. 

The High Court's Family Division declined to discuss or confirm Alton's account 
about the twins. 

Alton, an independent legislator who works at Liverpool's John 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Moores University, said the siblings' inadvertent marriage raises the wider 
issue of the importance of strengthening the rights of children to know the 
identities of their biological parents, including kids who were born through in 
vitro fertilization. 

Under British law, only a mother has to be named on a birth certificate. Such 
certificates also are not required to identify births that result from IVF or 
to identify the sperm donor. 

In addition, British law does not require parents to ever tell children that 
they were the result of donated sperm. 

Alton believes this should be changed. 

Alton said he favors an amendment to the Human Fertility and Embryology 
bill-which is still being debated in the House of Lords-that would require 
birth certificates of children born from donated sperm to say that and to 
identify the genetic father. 

Referring to the twins' case, he said: "If you start trying to conceal 
someone's identity, sooner or later the truth will come out. And if you don't 
know you are biologically related to someone, you may become attracted to them 
and tragedies like this may occur."





 
_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/


The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to