Axel Luyegi

 

For several days now there is a massive wave to go after Paul Kagame and his 
actions in Democratic Republic of Congo. We have passed 6 million people dead 
as you read this posting. Most of the women in Eastern Congo have been raped. 
But as Africans are going after Rwandese embassies and government offices all 
over the place, as Congolese are attacking Paul Kagame, as African presidents 
are attacking Paul Kagame, the real target in stopping the deaths and rapes of 
Congolese is a very immediate removal of Tony Blair from Kigali. Tony Blair is 
directly responsible for the catastrophe we have in DRC, and until when we as 
Africans can raise up and pack him on a stupid flight, we will continue to 
loose people in DRC massively. Let me state as well, as long as Tony Blair and 
Clare Short are in Great Lakes we will never get any peace in The Democratic 
Republic of Congo.

 

My question to you sir is how many lives have been lost due Julian Assange?

 

EM
On the 49th

 

 

           Thé Mulindwas Communication Group
"With Yoweri Museveni and Dr. Kiiza Besigye Uganda is in anarchy"
           Kuungana Mulindwa Mawasiliano Kikundi
"Pamoja na Yoweri Museveni na Dk. Kiiza Besigye Uganda ni katika machafuko"

 

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Axel Luyengi
Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2012 2:36 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; G_NET; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; oryema johnson; 
Valentine Ojo; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [congokin-tribune] JULIAN ASSANGE - POLITICAL REFUGEE

 

  

Assange is a criminal bandit deserving years of imprisonment for rape, 
notwithstanding the weird backing he enjoys from his comrad, the ecuadorian 
president. By granting asylum to a rapist the Ecuador is guilty of obstruction 
of justice just as Kagame and Museveni are hiding Ntanganda, Nkundabatware and 
a host other rwandan and ugandan war criminals wanted by the International 
Court of Justice. 

 

If countries can now freely harbor fleing criminals, what will become justice 
and why are Nazis still being nabed from whatever hidout they are in and the 
host country charged as an accomplice?

Julian Assange must stand trial by all means even if it requires the storming 
of the ecuadorian embassy in London by British paratroopers to extract the 
bandit from his hole and take him to court to face justice.

 

I totally subscribe to the UK government's stance in this matter for the sake 
of justice.

 

Axel Luyengi

 

From: Herrn Edward Mulindwa <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; G_NET 
<[email protected]>; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; oryema johnson <[email protected]>; Valentine Ojo 
<[email protected]>; [email protected] 
Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2012 7:53 AM
Subject: [congokin-tribune] JULIAN ASSANGE - POLITICAL REFUGEE

  


Julian Assange - Political Refugee
By Stephen Lendman
8-19-12

        
        


International law protects refugees and asylum seekers.

Article I of the 1951 UN Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees calls 
them:

"A person who owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of 
race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or 
political opinion, is outside the country of their nationality, and is unable 
to or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail him/herself of the protection 
of that country."

Post-WW II, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) was established to 
help them.

To gain legal protection, they must:

* be outside their country of origin;

* fear persecution;

* be harmed or fear harm by their government or others;

* fear persecution for at least one of the above cited reasons; and

* pose no danger to others.

Immihelp.com calls asylum and refugee status "closely related." They differ 
"only in the place where a person asks for asylum status."

Refugee status is asked for outside countries of origin. "However, all people 
who are granted asylum status must meet the definition of a refugee."

Assange is entitled to political refugee rights. Britain won't grant them.

Ecuador granted him political asylum. His fears are well-founded. If Britain 
extradites him to Sweden, he'll be sent to America. He'll be unjustly 
prosecuted for whistleblowing. He'll face many years in prison or capital 
punishment.

An earlier New York Times report said a secret grand jury convened. At issue is 
charging Assange with espionage under the 1917 Espionage Act.

Doing so contradicts the law's intent. It doesn't deter Justice Department 
officials from using it. It passed shortly after America's entry into WW I. 
Over time it's been amended numerous times.

Originally it prohibited interfering with US military operations, supporting 
the nation's enemies, promoting insubordination in the ranks, or obstructing 
military recruitment.

In 1921, its most controversial provisions were repealed. In 2010, Bradley 
Manning was charged under the Act. Technically its under Article 134 of the 
Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). It includes parts of the US Code.

Allegedly a sealed Assange indictment is ready to be made public whenever 
Washington wishes to do so. Espionage Act violations will be charged.

America twists legal meanings to serve its interests. Bogus charges facilitate 
hanging innocent victims out to dry. Headlines portray Assange as public enemy 
number one. He won't get a moment's peace.

Asylum isn't freedom. UK Foreign Secretary William Hague said London won't 
grant safe passage. Britain's Foreign Office said:

"We are determined to carry out our legal obligation to see Julian Assange 
extradited to Sweden."

"We will not allow Mr. Assange safe passage out of the UK, nor is there any 
legal basis for us to do so. The UK does not accept the principle of diplomatic 
asylum."

"It is far from a universally accepted concept: the United Kingdom is not a 
party to any legal instruments, which require us to recognize the grant of 
diplomatic asylum by a foreign embassy in this country."

Hague added in part:

"We are disappointed by the statement by Ecuador's Foreign Minister today that 
Ecuador has offered political asylum to Julian Assange."

"Under our law, with Mr. Assange having exhausted all options of appeal, the 
British authorities are under a binding obligation to extradite him to Sweden."

"We must carry out that obligation and of course we fully intend to do so. The 
Ecuadorian Government's decision this afternoon does not change that in any 
way."

"Nor does it change the current circumstances in any way. We remain committed 
to a diplomatic solution that allows us to carry out our obligations as a 
nation under the Extradition Act."

"The UK does not accept the principle of diplomatic asylum."

Hague omitted saying Britain spurns international law principles repeatedly. 
Like America, other NATO nations, and Israel, it operates extrajudicially.

On August 19, the Union of South American Nations (UNASUR) will hold an 
extraordinary meeting in Ecuador. Assange's situation will be discussed.

Britain and Ecuador are at impasse. Resolution may not come soon. Assange 
remains holed up in Ecuador's London embassy. WikiLeaks posted his statement on 
its Twitter page, saying:

"It was not Britain or my home country, Australia, that stood up to protect me 
from prosecution, but a courageous, independent Latin American nation."

At issue is how to get there safely. More on that below.

Peru holds UNASUR's rotating presidency. A statement released on its foreign 
ministry website says:

"The Foreign Ministry of Peru lets public opinion know that, in concordance 
with the statutory responsibilities of the temporary presidency of UNASUR, at 
the behest of the Republic of Ecuador and after consulting member states, an 
extraordinary meeting of the Counsel of Foreign Ministers of the Union has been 
convened on Sunday August 19 in the city of Guayaquil, Ecuador."

"The meeting has been requested with the intention of considering the situation 
raised at the embassy of Ecuador in the United Kingdom."

On August 24, Organization of American States (OAS) voted to meet in 
Washington. At issue is discussing Ecuador's granting Assange asylum. 
Twenty-three members voted in favor of the meeting. America, Canada, and 
Trinidad and Tobago opposed the resolution. Five nations abstained. Another 
three were absent.

OAS secretary general Jose Miguel Insulza said convening isn't about Assange 
per se. It's to discuss "the problem posed by the threat or warning made to 
Ecuador by the possibility of an intervention into its embassy in London."

"The issue that concerns us is the inviolability of diplomatic missions of all 
members of this organization, something that is of interest to all of us."

What OAS will accomplish is doubtful. It largely defers to US interests. Its 
history is long and shameful. Chartered to "promote democratic institutions," 
it defiled them for decades.

Previous leaders include a rogue's gallery of regional despots. They include 
father and son Duvalier in Haiti, fascist Rios Montt in Guatemala, Pinochet in 
Chile, an array of Mexican despots, Fujimori and others like him in Peru, 
Somoza in Nicaragua, Batista in Cuba, and other death squad rulers in Brazil, 
Argentina, Ecuador, Bolivia, Paraguay, Uruguay, Honduras, El Salvador and 
elsewhere in the region.

Instead of combatting terrorism, they practiced it. In countries like Haiti, 
Honduras and Colombia little changed. Whether or not they'll support Ecuador 
remains unclear. Perhaps so if they're worried about their own security.

Assange saw his native Australia spurn him when he's most in need. Instead of 
condemning UK bullying and refusal to grant safe passage, Prime Minister Julia 
Gillard cynically claimed she can't help.

It's none of Australia's business, she suggested. All nations are obligated to 
protect their citizens. International law requires it. Core tenets include the 
right to life and humane treatment. It holds abroad as well at home. Consular 
support is responsible when domestic help isn't available.

In 2010, Gillard called releasing diplomatic cables "grossly irresponsible" and 
"illegal." No matter that state secrets weren't revealed. Information at most 
was embarrassing, not harmful. Australia supports Washington's imperium. It's 
complicit with Obama officials intent to prosecute and imprison Assange.

On August 17, the UK Telegraph headlined "WikiLeaks: Julian Assange will take 
Britain to the 'World Court,' " saying:

In 1998, Baltasar Garzon indicted Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet. He now 
represents Assange. He's a political refugee, he said. Ecuador granted him 
asylum status. Britain is obligated to honor it.

"They have to comply with diplomatic and legal obligations under the 1951 UN 
Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, and respect the sovereignty of a 
country that has granted asylum."

"If Britain doesn't comply with its obligations, we will go before 
International Court of Justice to demand that Britain complies with its 
obligations because there is a person who runs the risk of being persecuted 
politically."

Michael Ratner is president of the Center for Constitutional Rights. He 
provides Assange legal advice. He denounced Britain, saying:

"They overstepped, looked like bullies, and made (things) into a big-power 
versus small power conflict."

Britain should "back off." So should America. Both countries should obey 
international law and respect Assange's status. "He has a legal right to asylum 
under the refugee convention."

"Under the UN declarations, there cannot be any adverse consequences for 
countries granting asylum. It's considered a humanitarian act."

British officials act like "bullies" for Washington.

On August 16, British MP George Galloway slammed his government for supporting 
Washington's intent to crucify Assange. He called Sweden's bogus sex charges 
cover to ship him to America. He hit hard explaining:

"Is there anyone out there that thinks that Britain is doing this, would do 
that because of charges of sexual misconduct in Sweden? Is there anybody out 
there really thinks that?"

"Or is it more likely that Britain has done this and will perhaps do the rest 
in the service of the United States of America, which is salivating at the 
possibility of getting their hands on the man who with WikiLeaks embarrassed 
American and British imperialism in front of the whole world?"

On June 20, a Washington Post editorial headlined "Asylum for Julian Assange?" 
saying:

Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa is "a small-time South American autocrat." 
Chavez "has been his political mentor." He boosted his political influence by 
granting Assange an interview. He hosted a popular Russia Today program.

A litany of canards followed. The Post made spurious anti-Correa accusations. 
It dismissively ignored likely US extradition, espionage charges and 
imprisonment. Guilt or innocence doesn't matter.

It acted like Obama's spokesman. It said US-Ecuadorian trade relations may 
suffer. "If Mr. Correa seeks to appoint himself America's chief Latin American 
enemy and Julian Assange's protector...it's not hard to imagine the outcome."

It's simple knowing which side the Post favors. It consistently supports US 
imperial interests. It's firm against whatever compromises them. It's 
comfortable about policies harming others. It cheerleads America's war machine. 
So do other Western media scoundrels.

A Final Comment

On August 16, the London Guardian published ways Assange might leave Britain 
freely. They range from diplomatic status to smuggling him out. Ideas discussed 
include:

(1) Giving Assange a diplomatic passport. They facilitate travel but don't 
confer immunity.

(2) Granting him diplomatic status. Doing so immunizes him from prosecution. 
Article 29 of the Vienna Convention states:

"The person of a diplomatic agent shall be inviolable. He shall not be liable 
to any form of arrest or detention. The receiving state shall treat him with 
due respect and shall take all appropriate steps to prevent any attack on his 
person, freedom or dignity."

At the same time, nations are obligated to respect each other's laws. According 
to former UK Foreign Office lawyer Joanne Foakes:

"In principle, a state can freely appoint anyone as a member of its mission, 
apart from its head of mission."

"But if they were to seek to do so now, it would be an obvious device to evade 
the laws of the receiving state, the UK. In these circumstances the UK may feel 
justified in repudiating such an appointment."

(3) Diplomatic vehicles can't be searched. Provide one for transport to 
London's international airport. At issue is getting on, off, onboard an 
aircraft, safely out of British airspace, and not intercepted by US warplanes 
en route to Ecuador.

(4) Smuggle him out or use a crate, bag or other container. The Vienna 
Convention says "diplomatic bag(s) shall not be opened or detained." They can 
be scanned or subjected to thermal imaging. Body heat would reveal something 
live. Britain might demand to know what.

Other alternatives include diplomacy, pro-Assange world opinion, other nations 
and British MPs speaking out on his behalf, perhaps a favorable World Court 
decision, UK embarrassment, or maybe after months of standoff its government 
deciding it's not worth the fuss, bother, or row.

For now, Assange remains in limbo. Determined Ecuadorean ingenuity and 
commitment are needed to save him.

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at 
[email protected].

His new book is titled "How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, 
Government Collusion and Class War"

http://www.claritypress.com/Lendman.html

Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge 
discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the 
Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and 
Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour

 

 

           Thé Mulindwas Communication Group
"With Yoweri Museveni and Dr. Kiiza Besigye Uganda is in anarchy"
           Kuungana Mulindwa Mawasiliano Kikundi
"Pamoja na Yoweri Museveni na Dk. Kiiza Besigye Uganda ni katika machafuko"

 

__._,_.___

Répondre à  
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=Re%A0%3A%20Re%3A%20%5Bcongokin-tribune%5D%20JULIAN%20ASSANGE%20-%20POLITICAL%20REFUGEE>
 expéditeur | Répondre à  
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=Re%A0%3A%20Re%3A%20%5Bcongokin-tribune%5D%20JULIAN%20ASSANGE%20-%20POLITICAL%20REFUGEE>
 groupe | Répondre  
<http://fr.groups.yahoo.com/group/congokin-tribune/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJzOHQxdjdjBF9TAzk3NDkwNDY4BGdycElkAzEwNzEwMzY2BGdycHNwSWQDMjEyMzgxNDcwMARtc2dJZAMxMDgwMDIEc2VjA2Z0cgRzbGsDcnBseQRzdGltZQMxMzQ1NDAxNDE1?act=reply&messageNum=108002>
 en mode Web |  
<http://fr.groups.yahoo.com/group/congokin-tribune/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJmYTJ1bnNlBF9TAzk3NDkwNDY4BGdycElkAzEwNzEwMzY2BGdycHNwSWQDMjEyMzgxNDcwMARzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNudHBjBHN0aW1lAzEzNDU0MDE0MTU->
 Nouvelle discussion 

Toute la discussion 
<http://fr.groups.yahoo.com/group/congokin-tribune/message/107999;_ylc=X3oDMTM5ZXF1cXRlBF9TAzk3NDkwNDY4BGdycElkAzEwNzEwMzY2BGdycHNwSWQDMjEyMzgxNDcwMARtc2dJZAMxMDgwMDIEc2VjA2Z0cgRzbGsDdnRwYwRzdGltZQMxMzQ1NDAxNDE1BHRwY0lkAzEwNzk5OQ-->
  (2) 

Activités récentes: 

·          
<http://fr.groups.yahoo.com/group/congokin-tribune/members;_ylc=X3oDMTJnY2FiZzlxBF9TAzk3NDkwNDY4BGdycElkAzEwNzEwMzY2BGdycHNwSWQDMjEyMzgxNDcwMARzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2bWJycwRzdGltZQMxMzQ1NDAxNDE1?o=6>
 Nouveaux membres 1 

 
<http://fr.groups.yahoo.com/group/congokin-tribune;_ylc=X3oDMTJmZGZoZnZpBF9TAzk3NDkwNDY4BGdycElkAzEwNzEwMzY2BGdycHNwSWQDMjEyMzgxNDcwMARzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzEzNDU0MDE0MTU->
 Aller sur votre groupe 

 
<http://fr.groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJlcm85aG82BF9TAzk3NDkwNDY2BGdycElkAzEwNzEwMzY2BGdycHNwSWQDMjEyMzgxNDcwMARzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTM0NTQwMTQxNQ-->
 Yahoo! Groupes

Passer à :  
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=Changer%20le%20format%20:%20Traditionnel>
 Texte seulement,  
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=Messages%20du%20groupe%20:%20Résumé>
 Résumé du jour •  
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=Désinscription> 
Désinscription •  <http://fr.docs.yahoo.com/info/utos.html> Conditions 
d’utilisation

.

  
<http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97490468/grpId=10710366/grpspId=2123814700/msgId=108002/stime=1345401415>
 

__,_._,___

  _____  

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2197 / Virus Database: 2437/5209 - Release Date: 08/19/12

_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet

UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to