Description: E.J. Dionne Jr.

E.J. Dionne Jr.
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/linksets/2010/07/06/ABQAr7D_linkset.html>  

Opinion Writer 


Obama’s advantage, Romney’s openings


By E.J. Dionne Jr.
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ej-dionne-jr/2011/02/24/ABhJNkM_page.html> ,
Published: September 9The Washington Post 


Normally, a president presiding over 8 percent unemployment and in a country
that sees itself on the wrong track
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/page/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2012/08/27/Nati
onal-Politics/Polling/question_6485.xml>  wouldn’t stand a chance. But then
a candidate with Mitt Romney’s shortcomings, including his failure to ignite
much enthusiasm within his own party, wouldn’t stand a chance, either.

The combination of the two explains why this election remains close, but
President Obama heads into the campaign’s last phase with some major
advantages, starting, as Ronald Reagan did, with a rock-solid base. These
voters will support him no matter what the economic numbers say. Their
commitment helps create an electoral map
<http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/2012_elections_elect
oral_college_map.html>  that also favors Obama, particularly with Ohio
<http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/oh/ohio_romney_vs_ob
ama-1860.html>  stubbornly retaining a tilt the president’s way. 

Obama also has a benefit of the doubt from many voters because they know he
inherited an economic catastrophe, a point powerfully made by former
president Bill Clinton in Charlotte. And more voters are enthusiastic about
Obama, the man, than about Romney, the man. That’s why Team Romney had to
spend so much time at the Tampa convention rescuing Romney’s personal image.
It also explains the wide energy gap between the two conclaves.

Democrats were so eager to help Obama that it seemed they were ready to
cheer even the reading of a phone book or a grocery list. Tampa was flat.
Charlotte was hopping.

In fact, the same candidate dominated both conventions. But the centrality
of Obama to this election is also where Romney’s advantages begin. If
Republicans are rather temperate about their own nominee, they are
resolutely determined to oust Obama. This gives Romney at least some
maneuvering room with his base.

The economy’s difficulties form the Alpha and the Omega of Romney’s efforts
— and the economic reports
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/wp/2012/09/07/discouraged-wo
rkers-are-not-why-unemployment-fell/>  between now and Election Day seem
unlikely to show a sudden spike upward in the country’s financial fortunes.
Romney still has time to convince enough voters that they’d be better off if
they changed presidents.

Romney will have a money edge
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/romneys-july-fundraising-outpaces-ob
amas/2012/08/06/81da0024-dfe9-11e1-8fc5-a7dcf1fc161d_story.html> . In
presidential races, cash gaps don’t make that much of a difference as long
as they are not too big, and Obama’s fundraising will at least be
competitive. More worrisome to Democrats is how the super PACs financed by
billionaires and multimillionaires might affect House and Senate races.

Still, money does buy Romney additional options. The Republicans will have
extra dollars to use in trying to make states currently solid or leaning to
Obama — Wisconsin, and perhaps Michigan — more competitive. Obama can’t
afford to be sucked into contests in states he should be able to count on.

The debates next month are Romney’s biggest opening, and he’s very
disciplined in his approach to such encounters. He used them effectively to
turn back primary challenges from Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum. The
president, on the other hand, is out of practice. And although Obama
performed well in the 2008 debates against John McCain by directing almost
every word he spoke to swing voters, debating has never been his strongest
suit.

Indeed, some of Obama’s most loyal supporters see an additional debate risk
for him: The president can look arrogant and dismissive
<http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/05/26/obama-has-a-mean-streak-an
d-he-turned-it-on-romney-this-week.html>  when he doesn’t respect an
opponent or when he feels he has the upper hand. Obama can afford no “you
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/09/AR200801090
2785.html> ’re likable enough, Hillary” moments. Romney will try hard to
cause or manufacture them.

Nonetheless, there is a sense after Charlotte that Democrats are on offense
in a way Republicans are not. The Charlotte Democrats were unstinting in
expressing their devotion to veterans and to the men and women serving in
our armed forces. They thereby poached on territory Republicans took for
granted, thoughtlessly left open by Romney. In Charlotte, there was much
talk about upward mobility as a family enterprise. This provided Democrats
with a traditionalist counterpoint to a GOP that now speaks in relentlessly
materialist terms about investment and business. 

Democrats also opened up foreign policy as a new campaign front, both in
Obama’s own speech and in a forceful and entertaining address by Sen. John
Kerry. Foreign policy will be only a marginal issue this year, but it favors
Obama — and close elections are won on the margins. 

There is, finally, the politics of class. Romney Republicans really do look
like the party of very rich people. Convincing Americans wealthy people have
to do even better for the rest of the country to do well is the hardest sell
Mitt Romney has to make.

 

 

           Thé Mulindwas Communication Group
"With Yoweri Museveni and Dr. Kiiza Besigye Uganda is in anarchy"
           Kuungana Mulindwa Mawasiliano Kikundi
"Pamoja na Yoweri Museveni na Dk. Kiiza Besigye Uganda ni katika machafuko"

 

<<image001.png>>

_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet

UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to