It is just strange that Iddi Amin that never went to school lead Uganda
better than Obama has lead United States. Ask me today what Amin did for
Uganda and I will gladly  list it.

 

EM
On the 49th

 

 

           Thé Mulindwas Communication Group
"With Yoweri Museveni and Dr. Kiiza Besigye Uganda is in anarchy"
           Kuungana Mulindwa Mawasiliano Kikundi
"Pamoja na Yoweri Museveni na Dk. Kiiza Besigye Uganda ni katika machafuko"

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Federica
Nshemereirwe
Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2012 3:09 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; G_NET;
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]
Subject: Re: {UAH} OBAMA ACTUALLY LEFT THE PODIUM THINKING HE WON THE DEBATE

 


In that case Obama is just typical African leader. He should come and
contest in Uganda where there is never a debate with your opponent!! Ha ha
ha!

F.N.

--- On Sun, 10/14/12, Herrn Edward Mulindwa <[email protected]> wrote:


From: Herrn Edward Mulindwa <[email protected]>
Subject: {UAH} OBAMA ACTUALLY LEFT THE PODIUM THINKING HE WON THE DEBATE
To: [email protected], [email protected], "G_NET"
<[email protected]>, [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
Date: Sunday, October 14, 2012, 1:21 AM

Clueless: Obama Thought He Won Debate Until Told Otherwise IVAN KENNEALLY 

 

According to an article in the Daily Mail UK, President Obama walked off the
stage after his underwhelming debate performance convinced he was the winner


By d1dure <http://my.auburnjournal.com/user_profile.html?user_id=44575> 

        

Clueless: Obama Thought He Won Debate Until Told Otherwise

IVAN KENNEALLY 

According to an article in the Daily Mail UK, President Obama walked off the
stage after his underwhelming debate performance convinced he was the
winner. Against the intuitive grain of 60 million viewers and a breathlessly
fawning press who winced through a painfully dismal showing, Obama was
content that he had delivered the rhetorical goods. He only realized he sank
like a Chevy Volt dropped in water after his senior aides broke the news to
the surprised, and disturbingly oblivious, Commander in Chief. Apparently,
the most transparent President in history in also the least self-aware.

Senior aides had been wrought with anxiety for weeks that Obama wouldn’t
fare well since he stubbornly refused to rigorously prepare: “’President
Obama made it clear he wanted to be doing anything else – anything – but
debate prep. He kept breaking off whenever he got the opportunity and never
really focused on the event.” While campaigning in Nevada, Obama even poked
fun at his own reluctance to hunker down: “ It’s a drag. They’re making me
do my homework.”

Some aides anonymously revealed that Obama’s disdain for Romney runs so deep
he considered preparation for the contest, and Romney as well, beneath him.
His dripping contempt was palpable on the stage, as he refused to make
sustained eye-contact with Romney, looking down at his shoes as if they were
outfitted with a teleprompter.

In fact, the President spent much of the debate rambling through vapid
talking points like he was lost in a fugue-state, tongue tied and generally
torpid. It was obvious that he did not adequately prepare but now we know it
wasn’t because of a demanding schedule (the day before the debate he visited
the Hoover Dam instead of practicing, much to his advisors’ chagrin). He
shirked what would seem like a top priority duty because he couldn’t muster
even the duplicitous feint of respect for an opposing viewpoint, disgusted
that someone has the audacity to challenge his ex officio proclamations.

But we learned even more than that, or at least had our growing suspicions
about Obama dispositively confirmed. Despite all the contentless folderol
about the virtue and wonder of bipartisan cooperation he spouted during his
first campaign for president, Obama loathes dissent and only begrudgingly
and condescendingly tolerates being contradicted. His brand of strident
confidence crosses a line into elitist hubris, shorn of every follicle of
humility, convinced that all who disagree with him are benighted fools or
evil adversaries.

In other words, there is something at the heart of Obama’s animating ethos
that abhors democracy, which necessarily gives free reign to a spirited
exchange of competing ideas. His famous thin-skinned hypersensitivity is a
symptom of a lack of self-reflection–criticism shocks him like personal
offense since it never really occurs to him that he might be wrong.

And given our persistent economic doldrums, our embassies across the world
on fire, Iran’s inexorable march towards a nuclear bomb, the increasingly
bombastic assertiveness of China and Russia, and an unemployment rate that
could only be lowered on his watch by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, there
are good reasons for him to reconsider his convictions. But alas, he marches
on into blissful oblivion, convinced he’s winning the war of ideas
effortlessly, assured his floundering is perceived by the world as triumph.

This raises, even shouts out, the question: what other issues only appear to
him through the filter of happy self-deceit? Does Obama really believe our
enemies in the Middle East are so charmed by his swagger that they would
never coordinate at attack on our embassies? Is he convinced we are grateful
he has kept us unburdened by the crushing demands of regular employment? Is
he under the impression Americans are thrilled they have skyrocketing health
care costs, byzantine bureaucracy, and increasingly limited insurance
options to cheerfully distract them from the despair of disease? Who are
these nameless senior aides and why aren’t they correcting him more often?

It is hard to imagine Obama will do much better in the next debate, unless
better means meaner and more aggressively mendacious. His biggest
vulnerability at the podium is his dour resentment for having to be there in
the first place, piqued that he should have to account for his himself
before the people that elected him, that he now, at least purportedly,
represents. Obama will attempt to feign interest but will only manage angry
indifference–debates are for disciples of democracy, not technocratic kings.

 

 

           Thé Mulindwas Communication Group
"With Yoweri Museveni and Dr. Kiiza Besigye Uganda is in anarchy"
           Kuungana Mulindwa Mawasiliano Kikundi
"Pamoja na Yoweri Museveni na Dk. Kiiza Besigye Uganda ni katika machafuko"

 

-- 
 
 

-- 
 
 

  _____  

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5331 - Release Date: 10/14/12

_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet

UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to