Obamacare Rips Off Americans r
By Stephen Lendman
9-14-13
Earlier articles called it a scam. It's a healthcare rationing scheme. It's
a boon to predatory providers. It's a plan to enrich insurers, drug
companies, and large hospital chains.
It's market-based for profit. It lets providers escalate costs. It's
regulation light. Loopholes let profiteers game the system. They let
business benefit at the expense of ordinary people.
Tens of millions are left uninsured. Millions more are underinsured. On
August 12, The
<http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/13/us/a-limit-on-consumer-costs-is-delayed-i
n-health-care-law.html?ref=politics&_r=1&pagewanted=all&> New York Times
headlined "A Limit on Consumer Costs Is Delayed in Health Care Law," saying:
Obama delayed a "significant consumer protection." He did so until 2015. He
did it secretly. He did it last February.
According to The Times, he "obscured (it) in a maze of legal and
bureaucratic language that went largely unnoticed." Labor Department
officials confirmed what happened.
Discovery will likely fuel greater debate. ACA's a healthcare disaster.
Millions already can't afford high costs. Obama may delay key consumer
protections longer. Maybe he'll suspend them altogether.
The longer they're deferred, the more consumers pay. Doing so makes
Obamacare less affordable than already.
Out-of-pocket deductibles and co-pays weren't supposed to exceed $6,350 for
individuals and $12,700 for families. Federal officials granted insurers and
employers one year's grace.
Obama touted caps as a key Affordable Care Act (ACA) provision. Deferring
them increases costs significantly. Doing so makes ordinary people bear
burdens they can't afford.
They'll be denied vital care when most needed. They'll be debt burdened to
buy mandated coverage. They won't get what they pay for. They'll be ripped
off so healthcare giants can profit.
Cap-free coverage isn't what people expected. Lots more surprises await.
More on that below.
According to The Times, (f)ederal officials said that many insurers and
employers needed more time to comply because they used separate companies to
help administer major medical coverage and drug benefits, with separate
limits on out-of-pocket costs."
Buying this rubbish doesn't wash. Companies had years to prepare. Instead
they pressured for relief. They usually get what they want. Doing sostraps
debt burdened households.
Who's advocating on their behalf? Who's listening? What administration
officials care? None did before. None do now. Sink or swim is official Obama
policy. So is enriching corporate predators.
Millions of households struggle to get by. Protracted Main Street Depression
conditions makes everything less affordable.
After rent or mortgage payments, healthcare coverage is the greatest burden
most face.
A senior administration official spoke anonymously to avoid embarrassment,
saying:
"We knew this was an important issue. We had to balance the interests of
consumers with the concerns of health plan sponsors and carriers. They asked
for more time to comply."
Ordinary people were thrown under the bus. It was done to benefit them.
Expect lots more corporate giveaways ahead. Expect them harming consumers.
In July, administration officials announced another major one-year delay. It
requires large employers provide healthcare coverage for full-time
employees.
They'll do it later, not sooner. Perhaps they'll weasel out of it
altogether. Obama waivers are easy to get.
Senior Obama advisor Valerie Jarrett said delay shows "we are listening" to
business. Complaints about complex reporting requirements were addressed.
They don't wash. Large employers have professionals able deal with all
issues. Consumer concerns don't matter. Bottom line priorities alone count.
Although both delays are unrelated, they show ACA is less than meets the
eye. It falls way short of providing equitable healthcare. It's a boon to
industry profiteers.
National Health Council head Myrl Weinbert said:
"The governmentÂ’s unexpected interpretation of the law will
disproportionately harm people with complex chronic conditions and
disabilities."
People with major illnesses face tens of thousands more annually in
out-of-pocket costs. Unaffordability means greater pain and suffering. It
risks shorter life spans.
In 2009, Obama said "limit(s) (will be placed) on how much you can be
charged for out-of-pocket expenses, because in the United States of America,
no one should go broke because they get sick."
In June 2009,
<http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/jun2009/db2009064_66671
5.htm> BloombergBusinessweek said "(m)edical problems caused 62% of all
(2007) personal bankruptcies."
Surprisingly, "78% of those filers had medical insurance at the start of
their illness. Over 60% had private coverage."
Medically-related bankruptcies rose steadily for decades. In 1981, only 8%
of families were affected.
Given years of protracted hard times, they're by far today's leading cause
of consumer insolvency. Obama's mindless of the problem. It's far greater
than when he took office.
Expect it to worsen ahead. ACA makes it more likely, not less. Consumer
advocates know they're sold out. Rose garden promises were fake.
National Multiple Sclerosis Society vice president Theodore Thompson said:
"The promise of out-of-pocket limits was one of the main reasons we
supported health care reform. So we are disappointed that some plans will be
allowed to have multiple out-of-pocket limits in 2014."
ACA requires dental care for children. Providers can offer separate
coverage. Federal rules say free-standing dental plans must have "a
reasonable annual limitation on cost-sharing."
No matter. Out-of-pocket costs and co-pay limits can be delayed. Gaming ACA
for greater corporate profits is official Obama policy.
Another loophole lets employers offer bare-bones plans. Minimal services are
provided. Hospitalizations and surgeries can be excluded. What good's
healthcare coverage without what's most needed? What good's having what
doesn't help?
ACA's fundamentally flawed. Universal coverage alone works. Everyone in
equitably. No one left out. Obama's fundamentally opposed. He's pro-business
at the expense of consumers.
On August 7, the Wall Street Journal headlined "
<http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324522504578654193173779414.h
tml> Members Only: How the White House is weaseling Congress out of
ObamaCare," saying:
White House officials released "legal details behind its ObamaCare bailout
for Members of Congress and their staffs."
Details are worse than suggested. They reflect "(i)llegal dispensations for
the ruling class, different rules for the hoi polloi."
Senator Chuck Grassley's 2010 ACA amendment said "the only health plans that
the Federal Government may make available" to Congress are those "offered on
ObamaCare insurance exchanges.''
Congressional members and aides aren't pleased. They don't qualify for ACA
subsidies.
They'll lose government contributions. They get them under Federal Employees
Health Care Program (FEHBP) provisions. They cover about three-fourths of
premium costs.
"At President Obama's personal request, the Office of Personnel Management
decreed that the Members don't have to get off the gravy train after all."
"The eat-your-own-cooking provision begins with the phrase 'Notwithstanding
any other provision of law.' "
It's a giant loophole. It leaves FEGBP's 1959 law unchanged. Congressional
members and staff benefit. The White House says they're entitled to enroll
in FEHBP concurrently with exchanges.
Doing so excludes them from Obamacare inequity. "Millionaire senators and
affluent" bureaucrats were supposed to be treated like everyone else. They
were supposed to play by the same rules.
Not in America. "It would have been fairer and less corrosive to the rule of
law had Congress simply passed a bill giving their workers a raise to make
up for the lost compensation of dropping out of the FEHBP," said the
Journal.
"But that would mean an ugly political fight that voters might notice."
"It's so much easier to slip through this political fix in August when
Congress is out of session and the press corps can't wait to hit the beach."
On August 8,
<http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/health-reform-implementation/316045-ob
amacare-cost-cutting-board-faces-growing-opposition-from-democrats> The Hill
headlined "ObamaCare 'death panel' faces growing opposition from Democrats."
It's designed to limit Medicare and Medicaid costs. Congressional democrats
facing tough 2014 reelection battles want Obamacare's Independent Payment
Advisory Board (IPAB) repealed.
So do the American Medical Association, American Hospital Association, and
other healthcare related groups.
Critics call IPAB a death panel. It gives appointed bureaucrats life and
death powers. They can cut essential care when most needed.
They can stop or limit expensive treatments. They can make costs for
administering them unaffordable. They can let providers charge whatever they
wish.
IPAB's designed to begin when Medicare cost growth exceeds a certain level.
Medicaid's affected the same way.
Appointed bureaucrats decide what's approved, what's not, what's limited,
and what care costs.
Doing so rations healthcare. It doesn't matter. Congress is required to
fast-track its recommendations.
ACA ostensibly precludes rationing. Reducing provider reimbursements works
the same way. Healthcare providers won't offer unprofitable treatments.
Patients needing them won't get them.
House and Senate IPAB repeal measures have 192 and 32 co-sponsors
respectively.
In mid July, the
<http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324634304578539823614996636.h
tml> WSJ discussed "an Obamacare board answerable to no one."
The law's "most disturbing feature may be" IPAB, it said. Letting
unaccountable bureaucrats make vital medical decisions raises disturbing
questions.
At stake are life and death issues. IPAB authority begins within two years.
Members will control over half a trillion dollars of federal spending
annually.
They're mandated to "develop detailed and specific proposals related to
Medicare." They include cutting costs below a statutorily required level.
IPAB's empowered to make rules "related to" Medicare. Medicaid's affected.
ACA stipulates "no administrative or judicial review." Board decisions are
nearly "untouchable."
Members are "presidentially nominated." They're Senate confirmed. They're on
their own. They can only be fired for "neglect of duty or malfeasance in
office."
Congress alone can overrule IPAB decisions. It can only do so through
"unprecedented and constitutionally dubious legislative procedures."
Debate's restricted. Congressional committee deadlines are mandated. So are
other accelerated procedures. Super-majoritarian voting's required.
"The law allows Congress to kill the otherwise inextirpable board only by a
three-fifths supermajority, and only by a vote that takes place in 2017
between Jan. 1 and Aug. 15."
"If the board fails to implement cuts, all of its powers are to be exercised
by HHS Secretary Sebelius or her successor."
Obama wants Medicare spending insulated from the political process. He wants
bureaucrats able to make life and death decisions. He wants Medicare
recipients denied care when most needed.
Authority this great is at odds with supposed separations of powers. No
branch is supposed to have more than others.
It never worked that way. It doesn't now. Checks and balances are illusions.
They don't exist. Democracy's a figure of speech. Government operates free
style.
It does what it wants. It does so without popular approval. It does it by
narrowly interpreting law. It does it fancifully. It does it
extrajudicially.
It's autonomous. It's detached. It's unresponsive to popular interests. It
operates in a realm of its own. It's self-serving.
It's no government of, by and for everyone. It does what it wants with
impunity. It lets presidents get away with murder. It's unlikely to reverse
IPAB powers.
They're "breathtaking," said the Journal. Congress relinquished its
authority to unaccountable bureaucrats.
In Mistretta v. United States (1989), the Supreme Court ruled that Congress
must establish an "intelligible principle."
It must "confine the discretion of the authorities to whom Congress has
delegated power."
Congress must take responsibility for fundamental policy decisions.
IPAB has "no such intelligible principle," said the Journal. On the one
hand, ACA lets board members impose deep Medicare cuts.
On the other, it's prohibited from rationing care. Reducing provider
payments achieves doing so. It forces providers to limit or stop seeing
Medicare patients. The same holds for Medicaid.
Doing so denies patients care or enough of it. Expensive illnesses will be
impacted hardest.
Giving IPAB unaccountable powers raises disturbing questions. It "could
decide to make cuts beyond the statutory target," said the Journal.
"It could require that insurers or gynecologists make abortion services
available to all their patients as a condition of doing business with
Medicare, or that drug companies set aside a certain percentage of
Medicare-related revenues to fund 'prescription drug affordability.' "
There's no limit. IPAB's no traditional government agency. It's a power unto
itself. Congress effectively abdicated. Judicial review's excluded.
Patients and providers have nowhere to turn for relief. Congress can repeal
IPAB's authority. It can defund its operations.
Doing either won't be easy. It's unlikely. Patient/provider relations won't
be the same. Unaccountable bureaucrats will decide what care they get, how
much, and at what cost. Many will end up on their own sink or swim.
It bears repeating. Obamacare's a health rationing scheme. Patients suffer
at the expense of bottom line interests.
They'll do so when treatment's most needed. They'll be denied or limited
when bureaucrats say so. They deserve better. They won't get it. Obama wants
it that way.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at
[email protected].
Thé Mulindwas Communication Group
"With Yoweri Museveni and Dr. Kiiza Besigye Uganda is in anarchy"
Kuungana Mulindwa Mawasiliano Kikundi
"Pamoja na Yoweri Museveni na Dk. Kiiza Besigye Uganda ni katika machafuko"
_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------
