Sexual Predator Honored 
With U.S. Postage Stamp 

By Matt Barber
10-27-13


Benjamin Franklin famously quipped, “In this world nothing can be said to be
certain, except death and taxes.”


Franklin evidently failed to envisage today’s postmodern left. For the
conservative, there exists at least one other certainty, and it is this: The
degree to which “progressives” attack you corresponds precisely to the
degree with which you challenge any among their assorted, distorted and
sordid sacred cows.

What would you call a 33-year-old man who both had and axiomatically acted
upon a deviant sexual appetite for underage, drug-addicted, runaway boys?
(No, not Jerry Sandusky.)

What would you call a man of whom, as regards sexual preference, his own
friend and biographer confessed, “Harvey always had a penchant for young
waifs with substance abuse problems”?

In a  <http://www.rense.com/general96/sexpred.html#.UmrUEiQh0oY> recent
interview with OneNewsNow.com, I called this man “demonstrably,
categorically an evil man based on his [statutory] rape of teenage boys.”

But you can call him Harvey Milk.

Harvey Milk’s only claim to fame is that he was the first openly homosexual
candidate to be elected to public office (San Francisco city commissioner).
His chief cause was to do away with the Judeo-Christian sexual ethic. In
1978 Milk was murdered over a non-related political dispute by fellow
Democrat Dan White.

And a “progressive” martyr was born.

Merriam Webster defines “pederast” as “one who practices anal intercourse
especially with a boy.” It defines “statutory rape” as “the crime of having
sex with someone who is younger than an age that is specified by law.”

Harvey Milk was both a pederast and, by extension, a statutory rapist. After
I publicly addressed this objective reality in the above-mentioned
interview, the liberal blogosphere reacted in, shall we say, an
informatively defensive manner

A Huffington Post headline
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/17/harvey-milk-stamp-matt-barber-_n_4
117311.html> screamed: “Harvey Milk Was An ‘Evil Man’ Who Raped Teenage
Boys, Unworthy of Postage Stamp: Matt Barber.”

The always-amusing Right Wing Watch blog breathlessly
<http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/barber-harvey-milk-was-demonstrably-c
ategorically-evil-man> posted my comments with the header: “Barber: ‘Harvey
Milk Was Demonstrably, Categorically an Evil Man.’”

And so on.

Here’s what’s especially telling about their reaction. Not one of the
dozen-or-more publications that reported on my comments even challenged
their veracity. Not one attempted to refute or deny that Harvey Milk was, in
fact, a pederast and a sexual predator.

That’s because they can’t.

One of Milk’s victims was a 16-year-old runaway from Maryland named Jack
Galen McKinley. As previously mentioned, Milk had a soft spot in his, um,
heart for teenage runaways. Motivated by an apparent quid pro quo of
prurience, Milk plucked McKinley from the street

Randy Shilts was a San Francisco Chronicle reporter and close friend to
Harvey Milk. Though Shilts died of AIDS in 1994, he remains, even today, one
of the most beloved journalists in the “LGBT” community.

Shilts was also Harvey Milk’s biographer. In his glowing book “The Mayor of
Castro Street,” he wrote of Milk’s “relationship” with the McKinley boy: ” …
Sixteen-year-old McKinley was looking for some kind of father figure. … At
33, Milk was launching a new life, though he could hardly have imagined the
unlikely direction toward which his new lover would pull him.”

In a sane world, of course, the only direction his “new lover” should have
pulled him was toward San Quentin. But, alas, today’s America ­ a burgeoning
relativist land of make-believe ­ is anything but sane.

Randy Thomasson, child advocate and founder of
<http://savecalifornia.com/harvey-milk-day.html> SaveCalifornia.com, is one
of the nation’s foremost experts on Harvey Milk. Of the Shilts biography,
Thomasson notes, “Explaining Milk’s many flings and affairs with teenagers
and young men, Randy Shilts writes how Milk told one ‘lover’ why it was OK
for him to also have multiple relationships simultaneously: ‘As homosexuals,
we can’t depend on the heterosexual model. … We grow up with the
heterosexual model, but we don’t have to follow it. We should be developing
our own lifestyle. There’s no reason why you can’t love more than one person
at a time.’”

Whereas McKinley, a disturbed runaway boy, desperately sought a “father
figure” to provide empathy, compassion, wisdom and direction, he instead
found Harvey Milk: a promiscuous sexual predator who found, in McKinley, an
opportunity to satisfy a perverse lust for underage flesh.

Years later McKinley committed suicide.

Another teen who crossed paths with Harvey Milk was Christian convert and
former homosexual Gerard Dols. In a 2008 radio
<http://www.cwfa.org/content.asp?id=15685> interview with Concerned Women
for America, Dols shared of how ­ as a physically disabled teen ­ the “very
nice” Harvey Milk had encouraged him in 1977 to run away from his Minnesota
home and come to San Francisco.

According to Dols, Milk told him, “Don’t tell your parents,” and later sent
him a letter with instructions. Thankfully, the letter was intercepted by
Dols’ parents who then filed a complaint with the Minnesota attorney
general’s office.

The incident was evidently swept under the rug.

So what does a man like Harvey Milk get for his apparent crimes? While most
sexual predators get time in prison and a dishonorable mention on the
registry of sex offenders, Harvey Milk got his own California
<http://savecalifornia.com/harvey-milk-day.html> state holiday (“Harvey Milk
Day”) and, more recently, his own
<http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Postal-Service-to-issue-Harvey-Milk-s
tamp-4888960.php> commemorative postage stamp, awarded by the Obama
administration’s USPS.

God bless America?

As troubling as the postage stamp may be, to me ­ the father of a
soon-to-be-teenage boy ­ the specter of having a “Harvey Milk Day” forced
upon millions of California children, parents and educators is even more
troubling. Especially in light of Milk’s own sordid history with minors.

Even so, and quite obviously, not everyone agrees. Some have said that my
reality-based assessment of Harvey Milk is “uncivil.” Our historical
revisionist friends on the left tend to get a bit snooty when you publicly
deconstruct one of their meticulously fabricated mythical martyrs.

I find that odd.

To me, even the mere notion of elevating, to hero status, a man who
statutorily raped teenage boys, is what’s uncivil.

Matt Barber <mailto:[email protected]>  (@jmattbarber on Twitter) is
an attorney concentrating in constitutional law. He serves as Vice President
of Liberty Counsel Action <http://libertycounselaction.org/> . (This
information is provided for identification purposes only.) 

 

 

           Thé Mulindwas Communication Group
"With Yoweri Museveni and Dr. Kiiza Besigye Uganda is in anarchy"
           Kuungana Mulindwa Mawasiliano Kikundi
"Pamoja na Yoweri Museveni na Dk. Kiiza Besigye Uganda ni katika machafuko"

 

_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet

UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to