Local Departments Fortify Police State With Armored Personnel Carriers
<http://www.activistpost.com/2013/10/local-departments-fortify-police-state.
html>  


 
<http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-QATRxv2Lsdw/Um2jylDoxQI/AAAAAAAAC78/z0ZN-fFD6Ig/s
1600/lenco-bearcat-boston-police-concord-copblock.jpg> Description:
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-QATRxv2Lsdw/Um2jylDoxQI/AAAAAAAAC78/z0ZN-fFD6Ig/s2
00/lenco-bearcat-boston-police-concord-copblock.jpg

 

Brandon Turbeville and Heather Callaghan

Activist Post
<http://www.activistpost.com/2013/10/local-departments-fortify-police-state.
html> 

All across the country, preparations are being made for a massive assault on
an enemy that has yet to be publicly defined. The preparations involve the
procurement of Armored Personnel Carriers (APCs) or Mine-Resistant Ambush
Protected vehicles (MRAPs), military equipment, and tactical training. These
preparations, however, are not being undertaken by the US military in
response to a potential outside invasion but, instead, by local police
departments towards what one must logically assume is a domestic threat. 

Indeed, police and sheriff’s departments all across the country, from
Michigan <http://www.freep.com/article/20130724/NEWS/307240127/>  and Ohio
<http://www.the-daily-record.com/local%20news/2012/08/22/orrville-unveils-ne
w-armored-personnel-carrier>  to Texas
<http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2013/09/dallas_county_now_has_it
s_very.php?page=all> , California to Idaho
<http://www.idahostatesman.com/2013/10/08/2803964/local-police-acquire-milit
ary.html>  to South Carolina, and from Maine
<http://www.sunjournal.com/news/lewiston-auburn/2013/08/06/lewiston-police-u
nveil-armored-vehicle-national-ni/1404456>  to Florida
<http://www.activistpost.com/2011/11/militarization-of-police-exemplified-by
.html>  are hardening their forces with militarized body armor, weaponry,
tactical gear, and APCs coming straight from the US military at bargain
prices. 

But who, exactly, is the enemy that American police must feel the need to
become so battle-hardened against? Even if one were to, for the sake of
argument, allow the ridiculous narrative of the threats of domestic
terrorism to be true, where are the armies of Muslim fundamentalists inside
of America? Or are the police actually preparing to defend American citizens
against some foreign military invasion by another major power? 

The answer, of course, is none of the above. American police are not being
trained to defend the American public – they are being trained to oppress
them
<http://www.activistpost.com/2010/08/ultimate-betrayal-police-and-military.h
tml> . In other words, the enemy for which local police departments all
across the country are preparing to engage in outright combat against is the
American people themselves.

Yet it is not merely the major cities of America that have been procuring
military APCs/MRAPs as many may initially suspect. Even smaller rural police
and sheriff’s departments have been obtaining APCs/MRAPs with no justifiable
reason for doing so.

For instance, while larger counties like Richland County, South Carolina
<http://www.policemag.com/interstitial/global.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2flist%2ftag%2
frichland-county-s-c-sheriff.aspx>  (to which Columbia belongs) have
recently procured an APC (complete with a machine gun turret that fires .50
caliber rounds), smaller areas like Florence, South Carolina
<http://www.scnow.com/news/local/article_3506ee8e-1bce-11e3-bc99-001a4bcf687
8.html?mode=jqm>  have done the same. Even small towns
<http://endthelie.com/2013/08/01/militarization-of-police-more-widespread-th
an-previously-thought-especially-in-small-towns/#axzz2ixVc6xZp>  like
Chickasaw Alabama
<http://www.dailypaul.com/300939/pictures-small-town-police-in-chickasaw-ala
bama-get-an-mrap>  and small rural counties like Marion County, South
Carolina have gotten in on the act, as well as universities like Ohio State
University
<http://www.nbc4i.com/story/23457727/osu-police-obtained-an-army-surplus-arm
ored-personnel-vehicle>  and UC Berkley
<http://www.infowars.com/dhs-gives-uc-berkeley-armored-personnel-carrier/> .

Indeed, as police departments spend taxpayer money to procure APCs and other
military-related equipment, the truth of the matter is that such equipment
serves no real purpose outside of a military combat zone. After all, the
sole purpose of an APC is to transport military personnel to and from combat
zones in a protected fashion. 

Although many police departments will argue that APCs will be used to do the
same for police during a hostage or standoff situation, one must ask where
is the actual combat zone? To most Americans, (except for those living in
Chicago perhaps), it might come as quite the surprise that America is
considered a combat zone worthy of needing APCs for transportation.

Of course, it should be noted that, even after arriving at the scene of the
hostage taking or standoff, police would then still have to exit the vehicle
to deal with it and put themselves in harm’s way as a result. Thus, the idea
of requiring armored protection on the way TO a standoff situation is null
and void. 

Indeed, whenever APCs are used during a live situation, the police who are
allegedly using the vehicle for their protection are often seen riding on
the outside
<http://connect.lawofficer.com/group/tacticaloperatorsspecialoperationsswatc
nt/forum/topics/are-we-using-our-armored-vehicles-correctly>  of the
vehicle, thus negating the entire purpose of the vehicle. 

Yet APCs, despite their uselessness in legitimate hostage situations, are
becoming increasingly common not just by the fact that police departments
are acquiring more and more of them but also by their use. 

Of course, the very fact that police departments are not only procuring but
using APCs and related weaponry against its citizens, particularly
non-violent, unarmed, ones, is the clear signal of a police state
<http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/oct/07/militarization-local-p
olice-america> . However, if police departments are procuring such vehicles
out of the “cool” factor where police merely gather new and more powerful
toys (as some have argued) then the police departments are guilty of grossly
wasting taxpayer money during a time of economic depression. Some argue that
it is like insurance
<http://www.themaneater.com/stories/2013/4/2/city-council-approves-purchase-
armored-personnel-c/>  – you hope you never have to use it but it’s there if
you do. Thus, police departments, at best, are flushing large amounts of
money down the toilet for their own entertainment or, at worst, ramping up
the full implementation of a domestic police state. 

Again, the answer is obvious. Law Enforcement has never simply acquired
weaponized “eye candy” that they do not intend to use. True to form, the use
of APCs by domestic police is already occurring and it is rapidly on the
rise. 

As Radley Balko of Reason.com writes
<http://reason.com/archives/2006/04/01/government-goons-murder-puppie)> , 

One of the most appalling cases occurred in Maricopa County, Arizona, the
home of Joe Arpaio, self-proclaimed "toughest sheriff in America." In 2004
one of Arpaio's SWAT teams conducted a bumbling raid in a Phoenix suburb.
Among other weapons, it used tear gas and an armored personnel carrier that
later rolled down the street and smashed into a car. The operation ended
with the targeted home in flames and exactly one suspect in custody--for
outstanding traffic violations.

In addition, according to Raw Story
<http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/09/29/dallas-county-police-to-execute-warra
nts-in-15-ton-vehicle-capable-of-withstanding-nuclear-environment/> , Dallas
County, Texas Sheriff’s Department has stated that its new APC will be used
for the purposes of serving warrants. 

As the Urbana-Champaign Independent Media Center reports
<http://www.ucimc.org/node/2059> , “on May 11, 2006, Champaign police
received a call from Garden Hills, about Carl “Dennis” Stewart, a suicidal
black man alone in his car with a gun. The Champaign police called out the
SWAT team and rolled out their prized Armored Personnel Carrier. After a
four-hour standoff, Stewart was chased down the street by the APC. Cornered
by police, he put the gun to his head and killed himself.”

Unfortunately, events such as the three listed above are becoming more and
more common in a country that still ironically boasts of being the freest in
the world. Routinely used in SWAT team raids APCs/MRAPS have now become
ubiquitous in the world of law enforcement and American life. Scarcely do
they even warrant a mention when raids are reported in media outlets. 

Clearly, the police are no longer tasked with even the pretense of
protecting and serving the American public. Indeed, official police training
literature and analysis reports consistently list both normal and informed
American citizens as potential terrorists, thus reinforcing the “us vs.
them” mentality running rampant throughout law enforcement organizations all
across the country.

With such benign behavior as supporting specific political candidates
<http://www.infowars.com/secret-state-police-report-ron-paul-bob-barr-chuck-
baldwin-libertarians-are-terrorists/> , paying for coffee with cash
<https://publicintelligence.net/fbi-suspicious-activity-reporting-flyers/> ,
having “apocalyptic religious beliefs
<http://www.cesnur.org/testi/FBI_004.htm> ,” and even possessing a pair of
socks
<http://www.activistpost.com/2012/09/debauchery-and-hypocrisy-to-take-center
.html>  as potential domestic terrorism, the police have been successfully
trained to view the American citizen as both a threat and a danger to the
law and order of the state. While the police may not be actual foreign
military troops, they are without a doubt an occupying force which sees the
general public as a subject population. Thus, the population is a threat
which they seek to extinguish. 

Regardless, whether or not the police actively take advantage of their
new-found military equipment, the mere possession of what amounts to a
military tank minus the cannon (although machine gun turrets are often a
part of the vehicle) can be used as a method of intimidation to any citizen
considering dissent against the current power structure. 

Indeed, in many totalitarian societies of the past, it was the perceived
domination and power of the state – not the actual power – which kept
millions of people in check. There is no doubt that the visual image of
APCs/MRAPs on the streets of America, occasionally serving warrants and
supporting SWAT raids, is an intimidating and threatening image and an
ever-present reminder of the power of the State.[1]

The presence of APCs on American streets is clearly not an organic or
isolated incident. As Wendy McElroy writes
<http://www.activistpost.com/2013/08/how-martial-law-in-america-will-affect.
html> , “it is part of a well-funded, coordinated federal program called
Operation Urban Shield.” Essentially Operation Urban Shield
<http://www.urbanshield.org/>  is a program designed to train law
enforcement to impose martial law . . . and American citizens to accept it.
Such was clearly the case in the aftermath of the Boston Marathon bombing.
Police in full combat gear were scarcely identifiable from the actual
military marched through the streets of Boston complete with riflemen posted
in gun turrets mounted on APCs/MRAPs. Likewise, APCs were a close companion
<http://endthelie.com/2011/11/20/militarization-of-police-exemplified-by-vir
tually-unstoppable-apc-at-occupy-tampa/#axzz2ixVc6xZp>  during Occupy
peaceful protests.

It is important to understand that whenever one witnesses simultaneous
events taking place in seemingly unrelated parts of the world, or even the
local scene, seldom is that series of events merely coincidence. It is
almost always the signal of a carefully coordinated and orchestrated agenda
taking shape after years of backstage planning.

Still, one should wonder just what law enforcement organizations are
preparing for and why they believe they need to be outfitted with
Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles and APCs. If even cursory research
is conducted, it will clearly reveal that it is because those at the top
level of society have a very grim vision of the future
<http://www.theguardian.com/science/2007/apr/09/frontpagenews.news> 

 

 

           Thé Mulindwas Communication Group
"With Yoweri Museveni and Dr. Kiiza Besigye Uganda is in anarchy"
           Kuungana Mulindwa Mawasiliano Kikundi
"Pamoja na Yoweri Museveni na Dk. Kiiza Besigye Uganda ni katika machafuko"

 

<<image001.jpg>>

_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet

UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to