Gay parties Western, not human rights

December 31, 2013  <http://www.herald.co.zw/author/wmurape/> Wenceslaus
Murape  <http://www.herald.co.zw/category/articles/opinion-a-analysis/>
Opinion & Analysis

Benny Tsododo

When the Ugandan parliament passed a bill that criminalises homosexual
practices, there was an avalanche of unmatched criticism and vitriol from
Western countries who castigated the bill as an insult to human rights. This
pro-gay lobby called for severe punitive measures against Uganda.

What is puzzling is that an independent African country that has unfettered
claim to self-determination could be ostracised for merely deciding to
criminalise a practice that widely frowned upon in African custom and
conscience. There is nothing untoward about the Ugandan anti-gay bill since
it is simply translating African culture into law.

Worldwide, culture and custom are incorporated into law through what has
become known as customary law. So, why deny the Ugandans and other Africans
a chance to turn their customs into law?

Throughout Africa, homosexuality is viewed as repugnant and an affront to
God’s procreation designs. In African settings, homosexuality, together with
other sacrilegious practices such as incest, is believed to bring
misfortunes such as drought, floods or outbreaks of contagious diseases.

This has been part of African culture since time immemorial and no one can
wish it away as it is the African way. Buoyed by its culture and custom, the
Ugandan parliament passed a bill that will outlaw some homosexual practices.
Member of Parliament, David Bahati, justly praised the passage of the
anti-gay bill, thanking the legislators “for the courage and defending the
children of Uganda and the cause for humanity, to protect our marriages, to
defend culture and to defend the future of our children.”

However, the passing of the bill did not go down well with the conceited
pro-gay Western community that immediately and unreservedly castigated
Uganda.

The US State Department said, “The United States opposes any legislation
that undermines a person’s enjoyment of his or her human rights, and for
that reason we condemn legislation that criminalises consensual sexual
conduct between adults or criminalises simply being of a particular sexual
orientation or gender identity.”

European Union foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton urged the Ugandan
government “to ensure respect of the principle of non-discrimination,
guaranteed in the Ugandan Constitution, and to preserve a climate of
tolerance for all minorities in Uganda”.
UK business tycoon Richard Branson called for a business boycott of Uganda.
“I would urge other companies worldwide to follow suit. Uganda must
reconsider or find itself being ostracised by companies and tourists
worldwide”, said Branson.

Deputy Africa director at Amnesty International, Aster Van Kregten said that
the anti-gay bill “amounts to a grave assault on human rights and makes a
mockery of the Ugandan Constitution.” Germany cut off aid to Uganda last
year citing the bill as one of the reasons. UK prime minister David Cameron
has also threatened to cut aid to Uganda over the bill.

Such venom was not only directed at Uganda, but at other African countries
such as Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe ran into flak for its stoic anti-gay stance
fronted by President Mugabe. President Mugabe has made it clear that
Zimbabwe would not recognise gay rights saying gays are worse than dogs and
pigs.

During a political rally at Mutare Aerodrome in 2013, President Mugabe
rightly pointed out that homosexuality is not consonant with the African
culture and practices. President Mugabe said, “We need continuity of our
culture. This culture comes from the norm that women carry pregnancies for
nine months.

If there is anyone who disputes that, he should lift up his hands to say no
I fell from Heaven. This thing (homosexuality) seeks to destroy our lineage
by saying John and John should wed, Maria and Maria should wed. Imagine this
son born out of an African father (Barack) Obama says if you want aid, you
should accept the homosexuality practice. Aah, we will never do that.”

Zimbabwe continued to grapple with the homosexuality discourse during its
constitution making process and later during the July 31, 2013 elections.
Some gay proponents were calling for the infusion of gay rights into the new
constitution. The pro-homosexual lobby found support in the MDC-T, which
took it upon itself to mobilise support for gay rights during the
constitution making process.

The MDC-T leader, Morgan Tsvangirai explicitly sounded his support for
homosexuality in a 2011 interview with the BBC. Referring to the
homosexuality discourse, Tsvangirai said that, “It’s a controversial subject
in my part of the world. My attitude is that I hope the Constitution will
come out with freedom of sexual orientation, for as long as it does not
interfere with anybody.

To me, it’s a human right.” On his cue, the MDC-T vainly tried to campaign
for gay rights during the constitution making process.
Zimbabweans unequivocally rejected the inclusion of gay rights in the new
constitution and later sounded their rejection of homosexuality by
delivering an indisputable electoral blow to the MDC-T during the July 31
elections.

This is what Africans think about homosexuality. The African jury spoke
through the 31 July elections in Zimbabwe and flatly rejected the practice
of homosexuality.

The viciousness of the pro-gay lobby also became apparent in 2010 when a
Malawian court sentenced two Malawian males to 14 years in prison with hard
labour for homosexual offences. The trial and sentences were roundly
condemned by the so-called human rights organisations such as Amnesty
International and donor countries such as the United States, the United
Kingdom, Norway, and the World Bank.

The donor countries went on to withdraw their aid to Malawi leaving the
southern African country trapped in economic quagmire. However, the judgment
by the Malawian magistrate Usiwausiwa stood in defence of the African
conscience. Delivering the sentence, magistrate Usiwausiwa said, “I will
give you a scaring sentence so that the public be protected from people like
you, so that we are not tempted to emulate this horrendous example.

We are sitting here to represent the Malawi society, which I do not believe
is ready at this point in time to see its sons getting married to other sons
or conducting engagement ceremonies.”

The magistrate called the offences “unnatural” and “indecent”. This was
supported by the Malawi Council of Churches which advised Government to
maintain the laws that criminalise same-sex sexual acts. The MCC asked
international organisations and countries to “respect Malawi’s cultural and
religious values and refrain from using aid as a means of forcing the
country to legalise sinful acts like homosexuality in the name of human
rights.”

Due to crippling economic challenges plaguing the country, Malawi ultimately
baulked under pro-gay pressure in 2012 and president Joyce Banda shelved the
country’s anti-gay laws. Against their culture and conscience, Malawians
were rail-roaded and bulldozed to acquiesce to gay practices.

Russia is also at the receiving end of the pro-gay lobby after it enacted a
law that criminalises some homosexual practices. The homosexuality
proponents are overzealously pushing for the boycott of the Sochi Olympic
Games to be held in Russia in February 2014.

It is clear from the foregoing that homosexuality is indisputably abhorrent
to African culture and conscience. African people, courts, parliaments,
churches and leaders have dismissed the practice as ‘unnatural’ and
‘sinful’. So why should the West foist such a despicable practice that
offends the African thought?

The detestable practice of homosexuality is only amenable to communities and
cultures in the West. Gay practices are not human rights but Western rights.
Western countries should not force other nationalities to accept
homosexuality.

Benny Tsododo writes in his personal capacity. Feedback on
[email protected] or Twitter @bentsodaz

           Thé Mulindwas Communication Group
"With Yoweri Museveni and Dr. Kiiza Besigye Uganda is in anarchy"
           Kuungana Mulindwa Mawasiliano Kikundi
"Pamoja na Yoweri Museveni na Dk. Kiiza Besigye Uganda ni katika machafuko"

 

_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet

UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to