*Re:British are dishonest on the question of Asians in East Africa*Distribute
this article wide.......
This son of our beloved Idi Amin is a carbon copy of our Dearest departed
Hero.Idi Amin is simply one of the greatest Ugandans, and Africans, to have
lived !!
Share Bookmark 
Print<http://www.monitor.co.ug/OpEd/Commentary/British-are-dishonest-on-the-question-of-Asians-in-East-Africa/-/689364/2280930/-/view/printVersion/-/7jel71/-/index.html>
Rating

 By Hussein Lumumba Amin

Posted  Wednesday, April 16  2014 at  01:00

Upon conducting a Twitter search on Idi Amin recently, I was amazed to come
across a fight between Britain and itself. There were raging tweets against
a British Asian lady, Yasmine Alhibai-Brown, a former Ugandan Asian. The
tweets were vulgar, disturbingly furious and complete with Internet links
to old news stories relevant to whatever accusations the persons were
inferring on her. They were in reference to a stand she took in defence of
British Muslims in an article in The Independent titled, ‘British Muslims
Running Out Of Friends’. She had written about state-inspired oppression of
British Muslims by British police, with the tacit approval of prominent UK
politicians.

Then there was an attempt at exposing the bigotry of the English Defence
League (EDL) by Huffington Post UK writer Will Black in his article, ‘EDL:
Marchers and Strange Irrational Rituals’. He seemed to be condemning the
English Defence League (a British nationalist group sometimes compared to
neo-Nazis). He then attempts to white-wash Britain of any racism, and then
finally, the writer throws the entire blame in former Ugandan president Idi
Amin’s direction.
Britain, while socially fighting with itself in 2014, still refuses to
acknowledge it’s political shortcomings (both historical and contemporary)
and tries to find some distant individual to blame for its current social
upheavals. Let’s face it. Native Britons can be understood for feeling
overwhelmed by foreign cultures taking an increasingly larger portion of
the physical, social and sadly, economic environment as well. Every culture
is fundamentally protective of its roots.

However, Alhibai-Brown defending the rights and freedoms of British Muslims
from harassment by police and the state is a message that says: “Hey! We
are British now. Suck it up.” But is that a reason for Mr Will Black to
blame Amin for British upheavals? Many Asians expelled from Uganda were
British as they left. They abandoned dual nationality after being given the
choice by Amin. He called himself ‘Conqueror of the British Empire’ exactly
because he chased the British from Uganda. It is after the expulsion that
it became clear to what extent Britain had still owned the Ugandan economy
but through a proxy - Asians with British passports.

In today’s UK, the issue of Asians is an easy excuse for writers like Will
Black to explain away British natives’ issues with British Asians; in part
because of the 1972 mass deportation. But what is less understood by
British natives, especially the many who quietly sympathise with the
English Defence League, is that their feelings towards Asians was similar
to what East Africans felt before and after independence in regard to
Asians “taking over everything” as the EDL so angrily says.

And that is why I question the lack of any narrative on the genuine African
concerns in any literature written by the British on the question of Asians
in East Africa. It seems British historians and writers conveniently refuse
to face the mirror to see themselves acting like little despots as they
forced tough labour and stringent economic conditions on black Ugandans in
the colonial and post-colonial era, leading to social tensions that
culminated in the mass deportation from Uganda in a justified act of
economic empowerment.
Records show that East Africa’s entire economy was handed to the Asian
community by colonial Britain who, in a despicable policy of that
deliberately confined the African native to remaining a third class citizen
in his/her own country (with the white British at the political top,
followed by the Asians on the economy, then the Africans as the workforce).

Having initially been brought to Africa by the UK under slave-like
conditions, it would have been appropriate for the Asian economic migrants
to maybe return home after their initial work contracts. In all fairness,
wasn’t it for Britain to either offer them sanctuary or return them to
India as colonialism ended in Africa? The African peoples had remained
economically impoverished following a century of policies that didn’t allow
them to be part of the economy except as labourers.

>From 1962, and after all three East African countries had become
independent, there was immense pressure from their people to correct this
economic and social system. The sometimes harsh treatment Africans suffered
at the hands of many Asian employers fueled the resulting social tensions.
In one of her columns in UK’s Independent newspaper, Alibhai Brown, while
recounting her childhood in Uganda, admitted that she, her family, and
Ugandan Asians constantly expressed hostility and contempt for black
Ugandans whose country they were living in.

And if I may put the matter in its proper historical context, all this was
happening before Idi Amin. He wasn’t there in 1969 when East African
leaders first decided on the expulsion. A decision that only came after
Britain refused to discuss and resolve the matter through political
dialogue.
Amin took over power in 1971, then did what he did best - take action.
Basically, if you forget your wallet in my house after enjoying a lively
dinner, the right thing for me to do would be to send you your property,
right? I would, however, sympathise with Asians enduring the effects of a
deportation. However, it was genuine celebrations for Ugandans regardless
of what they did with their economy after. At least they now had a fair
chance to take control of their economy and learn through trial and error.

And while we are quick to say that the country’s economy declined after
Asians left Uganda, we are yet to hear one critic offer a solution that
would have helped native Ugandans become major economic actors in their
country. It’s as if to suggest that the British injustice where Asians
deliberately held the entire economy was the only and best economic model
for Uganda. That would have been an unacceptable recommendation!

In the meantime, let’s compare the plight of economic migrants who are
summarily deported from the UK every day. If the numbers could be
consolidated, xenophobia would be British. Her Majesty’s government first
shipped Asian slaves to Africa in far worse conditions than when Idi Amin
sent their grandchildren to the West. Britain is now confronted with the
very issues it so conspicuously diverted away from herself after granting
African independence.

Mr Lumumba Amin is son of former Ugandan president Idi Amin Dada.

*[email protected] <[email protected]> *
_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet

UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to