Friends
For a very long time Edward has stated that Africa is failing for we have poor leadership and we should not go after Western countries interfering into our continent. I have stated that we have poor leadership but that leadership is in power not for we want it to be in power but for The West wants it into power. I have cited very many examples on how the west decides on who leads and who loses. I have cited how the Kenya election was decided by United States. And I opine that till when an African vote actually decides who wins an election, it is very stupid for us as Africans to even hold elections, we might as well simply call Washington or London to question them who they want in office and we move on. The west not only decide who leads us but they decide who is removed and who starts, who wins and who loses a war. Our continent is not independent and thinking so is delusional. The article below is how United States decides what happens in Honduras as by Hilary Clintons eyes. Tell me why a citizen in Honduras bothers to go and vote. EM On the 49th Parallel Hard choices: Hillary Clinton admits role in Honduran coup aftermath Clintons embrace of far-right narrative on Latin America is part of electoral strategy September 29, 2014 6:00AM ET by <http://america.aljazeera.com/profiles/w/mark-weisbrot0.html> Mark Weisbrot <http://www.twitter.com/MarkWeisbrot> @MarkWeisbrot In a recent op-ed in The Washington Post, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton <http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/hillary-clinton-reviews-henry-kissin gers-world-order/2014/09/04/b280c654-31ea-11e4-8f02-03c644b2d7d0_story.html> used a review of Henry Kissingers latest book, World Order, to lay out her vision for sustaining Americas leadership in the world. In the midst of numerous global crises, she called for return to a foreign policy with purpose, strategy and pragmatism. She also highlighted some of these policy choices in her memoir Hard Choices and how they contributed to the challenges that Barack Obamas administration now faces. The chapter on Latin America, particularly the section on Honduras, a major source of the child migrants currently pouring into the United States, has gone largely unnoticed. In letters to Clinton and her successor, John Kerry, <http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/the-americas-blog/108-members-of-congre ss-urge-action-on-political-repression-and-human-rights-abuses-in-honduras> more than 100 members of Congress have <http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/node/1170> repeatedly warned about the deteriorating security situation in Honduras, especially since the 2009 military coup that ousted the countrys democratically elected President Manuel Zelaya. As Honduran scholar Dana Frank <http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/140283/dana-frank/hopeless-in-hondur as> points out in Foreign Affairs, the U.S.-backed post-coup government rewarded coup loyalists with top ministries, opening the door for further violence and anarchy. The homicide rate in Honduras, already the highest in the world, increased by 50 percent from 2008 to 2011; political repression, the murder of opposition political candidates, peasant organizers and LGBT activists increased and continue to this day. Femicides skyrocketed. The violence and insecurity were exacerbated by a generalized institutional collapse. Drug-related violence has worsened amid allegations of <http://bigstory.ap.org/article/honduras-police-cleanup-efforts-stall> rampant corruption in Honduras police and government. While the gangs are responsible for much of the violence, Honduran security forces have engaged in <http://bigstory.ap.org/article/honduras-police-accused-death-squad-killings > a wave of killings and other human rights crimes with impunity. Despite this, however, both under Clinton and Kerry, the State Departments response to the violence and military and police impunity has largely been silence, along with continued U.S. aid to Honduran security forces. In Hard Choices, Clinton describes her role in the aftermath of the coup that brought about this dire situation. Her firsthand account is significant both for the confession of an important truth and for a crucial false testimony. First, the confession: Clinton admits that she used the power of her office to make sure that Zelaya would not return to office. In the subsequent days [after the coup] I spoke with my counterparts around the hemisphere, including Secretary [Patricia] Espinosa in Mexico, Clinton writes. We strategized on a plan to restore order in Honduras and ensure that free and fair elections could be held quickly and legitimately, which would render the question of Zelaya moot. This may not come as a surprise to those who followed the post-coup drama closely. (See my commentary from 2009 on Washingtons role in helping the coup succeed <http://www.cepr.net/index.php/op-eds-&-columns/op-eds-&-columns/top-ten-way s> here, <http://articles.latimes.com/2009/jul/23/opinion/oe-weisbrot23> here and <http://www.cepr.net/index.php/op-eds-&-columns/op-eds-&-columns/seven-weeks -after-honduran-coup-washington-still-lagging-the-region-on-restoring-democr acy> here.) But the official storyline, which was dutifully accepted by most in the media, was that the Obama administration actually opposed the coup and wanted Zelaya to return to office. Clintons position on Latin America in her bid for the presidency is another example of how the far right exerts disproportionate influence on US foreign policy in the hemisphere. The question of Zelaya was anything but moot. <http://www.oas.org/en/media_center/press_release.asp?sCodigo=E-214/09> Latin American leaders, the <http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2009/ga10840.doc.htm> United Nations General Assembly and other international bodies vehemently demanded his immediate return to office. Clintons defiant and anti-democratic stance spurred a downward slide in U.S. relations with several Latin American countries, which has continued. It eroded the warm welcome and benefit of the doubt that even the leftist governments in region offered to the newly installed Obama administration a few months earlier. Clintons false testimony is even more revealing. She reports that Zelaya was arrested amid fears that he was preparing to circumvent the constitution and extend his term in office. This is simply not true. As Clinton must know, when Zelaya was kidnapped by the military and flown out of the country in his pajamas on June 28, 2009, he was trying to put a consultative, nonbinding poll on the ballot to ask voters whether they wanted to have a real referendum on reforming the constitution during the scheduled election in November. It is important to note that Zelaya was not eligible to run in that election. Even if he had gotten everything he wanted, it was impossible for Zelaya to extend his term in office. But this did not stop the extreme right in Honduras and the United States from using false charges of tampering with the constitution to justify the coup. In addition to her bold confession and Clintons embrace of the far-right narrative in the Honduran episode, the Latin America chapter is considerably to the right of even her own record on the region as secretary of state. This appears to be a political calculation. There is little risk of losing votes for admitting her role in making most of the hemispheres governments disgusted with the United States. On the other side of the equation, there are influential interest groups and significant campaign money to be raised from the right-wing Latin American lobby, including Floridian Cuban-Americans and their political fundraisers. Like the 54-year-old failed embargo against Cuba, Clintons position on Latin America in her bid for the presidency is another example of how the far right exerts disproportionate influence on U.S. foreign policy in the hemisphere. Mark Weisbrot is a co-director of the <http://www.cepr.net> Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, D.C. He is also the president of <http://www.justforeignpolicy.org> Just Foreign Policy. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera America's editorial policy. Thé Mulindwas Communication Group "With Yoweri Museveni, Ssabassajja and Dr. Kiiza Besigye, Uganda is in anarchy" Kuungana Mulindwa Mawasiliano Kikundi "Pamoja na Yoweri Museveni, Ssabassajja na Dk. Kiiza Besigye, Uganda ni katika machafuko"
_______________________________________________ Ugandanet mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
