<http://en.ria.ru/analysis/> Analysis & Opinion
<http://en.ria.ru/export/rss2/analysis/index.xml> 


 
<http://en.ria.ru/analysis/20141028/194718621/Who-and-What-is-Causing-the-De
cline-in-Oil-Prices-and-Where-Will.html> Who and What Is Causing the Decline
in Oil Prices, and Where Will It Lead?




 

With oil hovering in the $85 mark, analysts have said a great deal about the
causes and potential consequences of the spectacular decline in prices.

 <http://en.rian.ru/> © RIA Novosti. Ivan Rudnev

12:30 28/10/2014

*        MOSCOW, October 28 (RIA Novosti) - With oil hovering around the
$80-85 per barrel mark, down nearly 30 percent from a high of over $115 in
mid-June, media and expert analysis about the causes and consequences of the
price decline has been extensive. We present another, Russia-informed
perspective.

Saudi Machinations Against US Shale and the Drive for Market Share

Among the most common explanations for the present glut of oil is the Saudi
Arabian drive to maintain its market share in Asia in the midst of rising
production worldwide, especially by the United States, a rising energy
giant, with its shale oil. Analysts note that Saudi moves may be part of an
attempt to price US shale out of the market, given that producing oil from
shale using “fracking” is more expensive than traditional methods of
extraction.

Telegraph columnist Andrew Critchlow
<http://en.ria.ru/agree_or_disagree/20141024/194545022/Oil-Price-Drop-Who-St
ands-to-Gain.html> told Rossiya Segodnya in a radio program on Friday that
while Saudi Arabia can produce crude oil for as little as $2 a barrel, US
production costs are some of the highest onshore costs in the world. The
same can be said of Canada’s tar sands.

Estimates vary as to the price at which shale oil becomes unprofitable,
ranging from $60-80. While the International Energy Agency estimates that
only 4 percent of American shale costs over $80 to produce, Bernstein
Research says that up to one third costs over that amount, Businessweek has
noted.

Meanwhile other experts are less pessimistic. Charles Ebringer of the
Brookings Institution
<http://en.ria.ru/analysis/20141017/194188214/Oil-Prices-Falling-to-60-per-B
arrel-Could-Re-Stoke-%20Economic.html> told Rossiya Segodnya that while “the
smaller boys get hurt in the $60 to $70 range in terms of drilling new
wells...I don’t buy the argument that all of the existing unconventionals
will all of a sudden shut down [due to lower prices].” Optimists often cite
the ever-increasing efficiency and improved technologies used in shale oil
extraction.

In the midst of the US moving ever closer to energy independence, and even
providing for exceptions to its ban on the export of crude oil, Saudi Arabia
has been offering discounts to the Asian markets, possibly as a preemptive
move to maintain market share. Investment banking researcher Jeff Dietert
noted earlier this month that signs point to a Saudi shift “from a strategy
of holding prices at around $100 a barrel to a focus on market share,”
International Business Times quoted him as saying.

A Saudi-US Conspiracy?

Meanwhile, New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman has speculated that
either purposefully or through the coming together of a fortuitous set of
circumstances, the Saudis and the United States may be waging a politically
motivated “oil war” against Iran and Russia. Friedman brings up the
precedent of the US-Saudi agreement from 1985, which reduced prices by
three-and-a-half times in one year from $35 to $10 a barrel, shaving several
points off the Soviet GDP and reducing its hard currency earnings.

Some Russian oil officials have had similar thoughts; Rosneft’s Vice
President Mikhail Leontyev
<http://en.ria.ru/business/20141012/193992405/Oil-Surplus-in-World-Market-Te
mporary-Rosneft-Vice-%20President.html> noted earlier this month that Saudi
“discounts on oil” are based on “political manipulation,” pointing out that
“Saudi Arabia is being manipulated, which could end badly.”

Other analysts
<http://en.ria.ru/analysis/20141017/194188214/Oil-Prices-Falling-to-60-per-B
arrel-Could-Re-Stoke-%20Economic.html> note that a politically motivated
conspiracy is highly unlikely; Ebringer said that while “the Iranians are
blaming the Saudis [and] the Russians are saying it’s a Saudi-US plot
against Russia,” these are just “great conspiracy theories, but I don’t
think any of them really have much merit. I think we’re in a classic down
market.”

Declining Global Demand

The decline in energy prices is partly attributable to declining growth
projections for the Chinese economy. Experts also note that economic
stagnation and the decline of industry in Europe, together with the
increasing use of gas and coal for infrastructure needs, has led to a
decline of demand for oil by up to five percent in the last year. Combined
with a slight decline in US demand, the oil consumption of the
industrialized countries is down by 200,000 barrels per day, according to
the New York Times. This has led to an overall excess of about one million
barrels in the world, with a present consumption rate of about 90 million
barrels per day.

Ebringer notes that the decline in prices has only been compounded by the
dumping of positions by Wall Street hedge fund managers, who had earlier
placed hopes on oil continuing its rise over the long term due to global
instability.

Rising Production and the Race to the Bottom

Expanded US oil production has been the main driver in the expansion of
global supply; the country now produces 8.7 million barrels per day and has
cut its imports from OPEC in half since 2008, according to the New York
Times. Critchlow notes that the catch-22 of US production lies in the fact
that the initial boom in drilling was stimulated by high prices, while the
country’s dramatic increase in output has now decreased demand. “America
just cannot continue to keep pumping and pumping...and yet expect the OPEC,
on the other hand, to cut back its production to defend their price level,”
Critchlow said.

Libyan and Iraqi production is also up, but remains unstable due to the
threats of Islamist militants blockading Libyan ports and capturing Iraqi
administrative and resource centers.

Saudi Arabia and Iran have also increased output, the latter due to the
weakening of international sanctions on the country’s light crude exports.
The OPEC countries are presently producing one million more barrels per day
than their own quota allows for.

Despite Saudi Arabia’s low production costs and $735 billion in reserves,
the country needs oil prices in the $80-85 range over the long term to
balance its budget, which is 85 percent dependent on the black gold,
Businessweek notes. Kuwaiti financial analyst Tariq Al-Rifai
<http://en.ria.ru/agree_or_disagree/20141024/194545022/Oil-Price-Drop-Who-St
ands-to-Gain.html> told Rossiya Segodyna in a radio program that while the
Saudis really are among the best-placed to withstand lower prices, “over the
long term I don’t think that is sustainable.”

November’s Quota-Setting OPEC Faces Likely Deadlock

Al-Rifai predicted that at the annual OPEC meeting in Vienna in late
November, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates are unlikely to
entertain the thought of reducing production quotas, while Venezuela and
Iran will seek such a reduction. Iraq
<http://en.ria.ru/analysis/20141007/193775661/Oil-Price-War-to-Hit-Both-Side
s-Amid-Flat-Demand.html> may also join the Venezuelans and Iranians, as it
needs prices to remain in the $95 dollar range in order to maintain its
national budget, and now more than ever, in light of the country’s conflict
with the Islamic State.

Effects on Russia?

Despite the fact that 15-20 percent of Russia’s GDP is based on oil and gas
revenues, which constitute 65-70 percent of the country’s exports, Russia
has reacted to the decline in a generally measured way.

President Vladimir Putin noted at the recent Asia-Europe Meeting in Milan
that present prices are not “any tragedy,” and that over the long term the
probability of an adjustment and upward correction was high, Reuters said.

Earlier, Putin
<http://en.ria.ru/russia/20141017/194225327/Putin-Federal-Budget-May-Be-Adju
sted-Expenditures-on-%20Social.html> noted that despite the projected budget
shortfall, which had been based on estimated prices of about $96,
expenditures in the social sector would not be adjusted. Putin noted that
the country will be able to “fulfill all social expenditures” promises, and
that it has sufficient reserves “to do it without any substantial losses.”

Liberal economist and critic of the Russian leadership Sergei Guriev has
<http://valdaiclub.com/russia_in_foreign_media/72740.html> estimated that in
its present condition Russia can withstand $80-90 prices for several years.
According to Guriev, this is due to the country’s accumulated reserves and
the floating ruble’s ability to mitigate some of the shock; production costs
are denominated in rubles, while revenues are in dollars.

At the beginning of October, the Russian Central Bank
<http://en.ria.ru/russia/20141002/193548767/Central-Banks-Money-Credit-Shock
-Scenario-of-60-Oil-%20Prices.html> presented a series of scenarios,
including a “stress scenario” and action plan for a decline to $60 a barrel,
which Russian Minister of Economic Development Alexei Ulyukayev described as
a doubtful scenario, given that such a price would be “uncomfortable for all
of the large producers and exporters of oil.”

Speaking to Russian business news television channel RBK, Ministry of
Finance spokesman Maksim Oreshkin noted that a stabilization of prices at
around $90 a barrel would result in a 1.5 percent hit at Russia’s GDP, while
decline to $80 would mean a 2 percent drop. Oreshkin noted that every dollar
per barrel represents about $2 billion in lost revenues for the Russian
budget.

 
<http://en.ria.ru/russia/20141024/194488415/LIVE-Vladimir-Putin-Attends-11th
-Annual-Valdai-%20Discussion-Club.html> Speaking at the Valdai International
Discussion Club last Friday, President Putin did not specifically mention
oil prices, but  <http://valdaiclub.com/valdai_club/73300.html> said that
Russia “is a self-sufficient country,” and that it would work to “develop
domestic production and technology and act more decisively to carry out
transformation.”

There are high
<http://en.ria.ru/featured/20141021/194392892/Russian-Economy-in-Need-of-Str
uctural-Reforms.html> hopes among Russian experts and by many in Russian
society that unstable energy prices, combined with Western sanctions, may
drive a revival of the country as a major industrial, agricultural and
technological power. Some industries have already seen growth in recent
months as a result of the government’s push for import substitution, while
the president
<http://en.ria.ru/russia/20141002/193557056/Putin-Russia-Plans-No-Restrictio
ns-on-Capital-Flow.html> noted the need for a “true industrial breakthrough”
in the coming years, which would reduce the country’s natural resource
dependency.

                 Thé Mulindwas Communication Group
"With Yoweri Museveni, Ssabassajja and Dr. Kiiza Besigye, Uganda is in
anarchy"
                    Kuungana Mulindwa Mawasiliano Kikundi
"Pamoja na Yoweri Museveni, Ssabassajja na Dk. Kiiza Besigye, Uganda ni
katika machafuko"

 

_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet

UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to