Did Hillary Clinton emails reveal location of ambassador killed in Benghazi
attack?


By  <http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/staff/lauren-carroll/> Lauren
Carroll 

 

Of course Hillary Clinton’s emails contained classified information, says
Fox News legal analyst Andrew Napolitano.

That’s obvious, in his view, from the sensitive content of the emails that
have been released.

The
<http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/09/us/hillary-clinton-emails-take-long-path-
to-controversy.html> FBI is now investigating the security of the private
email system Clinton used while secretary of state, which was not designed
to handle classified information. Clinton has said
<http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/25/politics/clinton-confident-never-sent-classif
ied-emails/> she never dealt with classified information on her private
server, though two government watchdog groups have
<http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2015/jul/29/four-pressing-q
uestions-about-hillary-clintons-sta/> said she did.

Even the emails that have now been made public contain sensitive information
-— including information about Benghazi, said Napolitano, a former judge, in
an
<http://insider.foxnews.com/2015/08/06/judge-napolitano-hillary-wanted-white
wash-part-her-tenure-secretary-state> Aug. 5 conversation with Fox News host
Sean Hannity.

"I saw emails that have been revealed under the Freedom of Information Act,"
Napolitano said. "And in them, she is discussing the location of French
fighter jets during the NATO bombardment of Libya, how big the no-fly zone
is, where the no-fly zones are, and are you ready for this? — the location
of Ambassador Stevens, who of course was murdered, in Libya. If that is not
classified — if she didn’t know that was classified, she has no business
being in public office."

Former U.S. Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens was killed in the 2012
attack on a diplomatic compound in Benghazi. Do emails contained on
Clinton’s private server really discuss information about his location in
Libya?

As we'll see, Clinton's emails discuss Stevens' location in general terms —
similar to information shared in the media at the time.

Key emails

We found six possibly relevant emails in the
<https://foia.state.gov/Search/Results.aspx?collection=Clinton_Email> cache
of Clinton emails that the State Department has released to the public so
far. These emails all take place in a one-month period in 2011 during the
Libyan Civil War, about a year and a half before the September 2012 Benghazi
attack. At the time, Stevens was not yet the ambassador — he was the special
envoy to the Transitional National Council (called the TNC), then the de
facto government of Libya — and he was embarking on his first trip to Libya
in this role. He became ambassador in May 2012, about four months before his
death.

We’ll lay out the key points in each email that speak to Stevens’
whereabouts, and then get into the analysis.

March 23, 2011: In this email, which Napolitano pointed out to us, Clinton’s
then-chief of staff Jacob Sullivan wrote to Clinton about the NATO mission
in Libya. Sullivan also wrote that someone named Bill was "trying to make
sure Chris Stevens gets into E. Libya."

March 27, 2011: This is an email between two State Department officials that
was then forwarded to Clinton. The subject line is: "Chris Stevens mission."
Regarding his location and travel plans, the email said, "The current game
plan is for Mr. Stevens to move no later than Wednesday from Malta to
Benghazi. He will stage off shore initially for a one day visit during which
he will have meetings with TNC interlocutors and get a sense of the
situation on the ground. The goal of this one day trip is for him to lay the
groundwork for a stay of up to 30 days."

April 8, 2011: An email among State Department employees (marked "sensitive
but unclassified") that was later forwarded to Clinton said, "Security
situation in Benghazi remains quiet. Chris Stevens & team are in the hotel,
moving only for meetings as required."

April 10, 2011: Another email among State Department employees later
forwarded to Clinton marked "sensitive but unclassified" said, "The
situation in Ajdabiyah has worsened to the point where Stevens is
considering departure from Benghazi. The envoy's delegation is currently
doing a phased checkout (paying the hotel bills, moving some comms to the
boat, etc)."

April 22, 2011: Yet another email among State Department employees, this one
marked "unclassified," that was later forwarded to Clinton, "I want to let
you know about a temporary rotation in Benghazi. TNC Envoy Chris Stevens has
been on the road since March 13, when he began his outreach mission, and has
been in Benghazi since April 5."

April 24, 2011: A final email among State Department employees later
forwarded to Clinton: "Stevens will be meeting with MFA in one hour and will
make a written request for better security at the hotel and for better
security-related coordination. He still feels comfortable in the hotel. They
are looking into the idea of moving into a villa, but that is some way off."

After this email, few of the emails released so far discuss Stevens in any
capacity until after the 2012 attacks. Clinton only participated in the
March 23 email conversation, and she did not say anything about Stevens’
location; in the other emails, she only received the messages. In any case,
the information ended up on her private email server.

What do the emails tell us?

These emails do discuss Stevens’ location, though the terms are vague. We
learn from the emails that Stevens was in Malta then Benghazi, where he met
with local leaders at unspecified locations, and he stayed at an unnamed
hotel. That’s about it.

Napolitano’s statement suggests that if a bad guy had gotten his hands on
these emails, Stevens could have been in danger because the bad guys would
know exactly where to find him. In reality, these emails don’t reveal much
more than what was publicly known at the time.

On March 25, 2011, Stevens’ predecessor, Ambassador Gene Cretz,
<http://www.state.gov/p/nea/rls/rm/159189.htm> said in a press conference
that Stevens would soon be traveling to Benghazi. We found at least four
<http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2011/03/159257.htm> State Department
<http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2011/03/159383.htm> daily
<http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2011/03/159473.htm> press
<http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2011/04/160022.htm> briefings between
March and April 2011, where a press secretary discussed Stevens’ Benghazi
plans with journalists. Quite a few newspaper and television reports at the
time said Stevens was in Benghazi meeting with local leaders, such as the
<http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/17/world/africa/17rebels.html> New York
Times and
<https://archive.org/details/FOXNEWS_20110420_220000_Special_Report_With_Bre
t_Baier?q=chris+stevens#start/102/end/162> Fox News.

The media reports did not mention that Stevens went into Libya by way of
Malta, and that he had set up shop at a hotel. There is, however, an
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/obituaries/john-christopher-stevens-us-
ambassador-to-libya-dies-at-52/2012/09/12/b1c00cee-fcd0-11e1-8adc-499661afe3
77_story.html> April 11, 2011, Associated Press photo of Stevens meeting
with local journalists at the Tibesty hotel in Benghazi, where
<http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/202446.pdf> we now know (as a
result of State Department and congressional Benghazi investigations)
Stevens had lived and worked in 2011.

Now to address the broader point of Napolitano’s statement: that Clinton
sent and received classified information. Three of the six emails detailed
above were marked "unclassified." Regarding the other three, Clinton
received information from other State Department employees, and — as we
found in
<http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2015/jul/29/four-pressing-q
uestions-about-hillary-clintons-sta/> a prior story — as head of the agency,
she had the authority to say whether information from her department was
classified or not.

Of course, there’s always the possibility of Clinton emails clearly
containing classified or sensitive information about Stevens that have yet
to be or never will be released.

But Napolitano specified that he was talking about emails already available
to the public.

Our ruling

Napolitano said emails released to the public show Clinton discussed "the
location of Ambassador Stevens, who of course was murdered, in Libya."

To clarify, Stevens was not the ambassador to Libya at the time, and the
emails occurred about 18 months before the Benghazi attacks that killed him.

Clinton received at least six emails that discussed Stevens’ location in
Libya, though the terms are vague -- for example, saying he was in Benghazi
at an unidentified hotel.

The context of Napolitano’s statement gives the impression that the emails
contain information that would have been damaging if released, but it was
widely noted in the media at the time that Stevens was in Benghazi, and on
at least one occasion, reporters encountered him at the hotel where he was
living and working.

The statement is partially accurate but leaves out important details and
context, so we rate it Half True.

 

 

EM

On the 49th Parallel          

                 Thé Mulindwas Communication Group
"With Yoweri Museveni, Ssabassajja and Dr. Kiiza Besigye, Uganda is in
anarchy"
                    Kuungana Mulindwa Mawasiliano Kikundi
"Pamoja na Yoweri Museveni, Ssabassajja na Dk. Kiiza Besigye, Uganda ni
katika machafuko" 

 

 

 

 

_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet

UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to