Opinion <https://www.nytimes.com/pages/opinion/index.html> 


We’ve All Just Made Fools of Ourselves — Again  


The awful corruption of scandal politics.

 <https://www.nytimes.com/by/david-brooks> 

By  <https://www.nytimes.com/by/david-brooks> David Brooks

Opinion Columnist

 



 

Representative Adam Schiff speaking in 2017 about the House Intelligence
Committee's investigation into possible ties between the Trump
administration and Russia.CreditCreditGabriella Demczuk for The New York
Times

“You have a president who, in my opinion, beyond a shadow of a doubt, sought
to, however ham-handedly, collude with the Russian government, a foreign
power, to undermine and influence our elections.” — Beto O’Rourke,
presidential candidate

“I think there’s plenty of evidence of collusion and conspiracy in plain
sight.” — Adam Schiff, chairman of House Intelligence Committee

“I called [Trump’s] behavior treasonous, which is to betray one’s trust and
aid and abet the enemy, and I stand very much by that claim.” — John
Brennan, former C.I.A. director

“The biggest scandal in U.S. history is coming into focus. On Friday Rachel
Maddow made it clear. Donald Trump conspired with the enemy.” — Rob Reiner,
film director

Maybe it’s time to declare a national sabbath. Maybe it’s time to step back
from the scandalmongering and assess who we are right now.

Democrats might approach this moment with an attitude of humility and honest
self-examination. It’s clear that many Democrats made grievous accusations
against the president that are not supported by the evidence. It’s clear
that people like Beto O’Rourke and John Brennan owe Donald Trump a public
apology. If you call someone a traitor and it turns out you lacked the
evidence for that charge, then the only decent thing to do is apologize.

Republicans and the Sean Hannity-style Trumpians might also approach this
moment with an attitude of humility and honest self-examination. For two
years they’ve been calling the Mueller investigation a witch hunt. For two
years they’ve been spreading the libel that there are no honest brokers in
Washington. It’s all a deep-state conspiracy, a swamp. They should apologize
for peddling the sort of deep cynicism that undermines our country’s
institutions.

And what about the rest of us? What about all the hours we spent speculating
about the Mueller report, fantasizing about the Trump ruin or watching and
reading speculation about these things? What about the superstructure of
scandal politics we have built and live in today?

The sad fact is that Watergate introduced a poison into the American body
politic. Richard Nixon’s downfall was just and important, but it opened up
the mouthwatering possibility that you don’t need to do the hard work of
persuading people to join your side. Instead, you can destroy your foes all
at once through scandal. 

Politics since Watergate has been defined by a long string of scandals and
pseudo-scandals — Iran-contra, Whitewater, Valerie Plame, Benghazi,
Solyndra, swift-boating. Politico last year
<https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/02/01/46-political-scandals-th
at-were-worse-than-watergate-216923> compiled a list of 46 scandals that
were at one time or another deemed “worse than Watergate.”

The nation’s underlying divides are still ideological, but we rarely fight
them honestly as philosophical differences. We just accuse the other side of
corruption. Politics is no longer a debate; it’s an attempt to destroy lives
through accusation.

The political media, especially on TV, now has a template it can apply
whenever a scandal looms into view, to hook viewers into the speculative
story line. According to the  <http://tyndallreport.com/> Tyndall Report,
the three main broadcast networks made the Russia collusion investigation
the second-most-covered news event of 2018, trailing only the Kavanaugh
hearings, another scandal.

All the players slip into their assigned roles. Straight reporters are doing
good, hard work. But the flow of information is not fast enough to keep up
with 24/7 programming, so you get this toxic deluge of raw speculation.

The accused’s political opponents assume maximum guilt. Imaginative pundits
take a few dots of information and connect them to vast if speculative
constellations of guilt. “I hear the indictments are coming down next week,”
they whisper to one another.

Members of the accused’s party attack the investigators themselves. They get
to enjoy their own sense of spiritual superiority when it turns out the
scandal is much smaller than it appeared, which is almost always the case.

It’s all a wonderful game. You don’t have to know anything about a boring
policy subject like economics, poverty or foreign affairs. You can have a
long career in politics and media by simply treating public life as an arena
of life-or-death gossip.

Since Watergate launched this Age of Investigation, government has become
much more transparent. As a result, public trust in institutions has
plummeted. The scandal culture hasn’t ultimately helped one party over the
other. It’s just spread a corrosive cynicism that has disabled government
altogether.

The ray of hope is that out on the campaign trail voters rarely ask about
the scandals du jour, which obsess the cognoscenti. Most of the Democratic
presidential candidates spent the last few months trying not to talk about
Russian collusion. They have found a vein of voters who would rather focus
on the substance of our historical moment: What motivated so many Americans
to vote for a presidential candidate they knew was untrustworthy? How do you
provide affordable health security? Is China a mortal foe?

The Democrats won the 2018 midterms by focusing on the issues, not
collusion. For most voters, politics is about their lives, not a
self-righteous TV show.

The Times is committed to publishing
<https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/31/opinion/letters/letters-to-editor-new-yo
rk-times-women.html> a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear
what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some
<https://help.nytimes.com/hc/en-us/articles/115014925288-How-to-submit-a-let
ter-to-the-editor> tips. And here’s our email:  <mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected].

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on
<https://www.facebook.com/nytopinion> Facebook,
<http://twitter.com/NYTOpinion> Twitter (@NYTopinion) and
<https://www.instagram.com/nytopinion/> Instagram.

David Brooks has been a columnist with The Times since 2003. He is the
author of “The Road to Character” and the forthcoming book, “The Second
Mountain.”  <https://twitter.com/nytdavidbrooks> @nytdavidbrooks 

EM         -> { Trump for 2020 }

On the 49th Parallel          

                 Thé Mulindwas Communication Group
"With Yoweri Museveni, Ssabassajja and Dr. Kiiza Besigye, Uganda is in
anarchy"
                    Kuungana Mulindwa Mawasiliano Kikundi
"Pamoja na Yoweri Museveni, Ssabassajja na Dk. Kiiza Besigye, Uganda ni
katika machafuko" 

 

_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet

UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to