Absent Trump-like Protections British Steel is Collapsing, Threatening
25,000 Jobs


The consequences of China Negotiations have wide ranging consequences


by  <https://punchingbagpost.com/author/ryancrescitelli/> Ryan Crescitelli 

 
<https://punchingbagpost.com/2019/05/24/absent-trump-like-protections-britis
h-steel-is-collapsing-threatening-25000-jobs/> May 27, 2019 

 
<https://punchingbagpost.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/britsteel_sdfgsdh.jp
g> 

 
<https://punchingbagpost.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/britsteel_sdfgsdh.jp
g> 

 

Full disclosure, I detest tariffs.

An education in economic policy and business analytics, as well as
observational experience of historical transpirings has reinforced a core
ideology that free markets and free trade are – in a near perfect world –
the absolute standard to strive for in international commerce.

But the global economy of 2019 is very far from perfect, replete with
countless economic actors that don’t play even close to by the rulebook of
classical liberal economics (think Adam Smith) like the US strives to.

The influence of foreign actors, from subsidies and tariffs imposed by
fellow democracies like Canada and the members of the EU, to hardline
government interventionism from regimes like China, has an undeniable
negative effect on domestic industries playing by the limiting rules of free
trade.

In some ways this is expected, as the only way for many foreign firms to
compete with American economic muscle is with these protective barriers.
China, for their part, won’t even import many American products, like Google
software and devices or certain crops. Canadian dairy would be overwhelmed
in months, maybe weeks, if American counterparts weren’t kept at bay.

While economists steadfastly argue that free trade is worth striving for
even with these international obstacles in place, for blue collar workers
losing their steel mill jobs, maximizing net economic utility is a lot less
important than being able to put food on the table.

And really, that dichotomy between academics and the ‘boots on the ground’
as it were is where Donald Trump saw the opportunity, if not necessity, to
partially shield a dying American industry from unfair competition. Trump
famously coins his path to be ‘fair trade’ over free trade.

If the UK’s imploding steel industry is any indication, that protection was
well warranted and saved countless jobs. Currently across the Atlantic, a
steel industry crisis is in full swing as the UK’s second largest steel
producer ‘British Steel’ plummets towards total insolvency as foreign
competition, including that revitalized American steel industry, shatters
their competitive edge. The BBC reports,

“British Steel has been placed in compulsory liquidation, putting 5,000 jobs
at risk and endangering 20,000 in the supply chain.

The move follows a breakdown in rescue talks between the government and the
company’s owner, Greybull. The Government’s Official Receiver has taken
control of the company as part of the liquidation process.

The search for a buyer for British Steel has already begun. In the meantime,
it will trade normally. The Official Receiver said British Steel Ltd had
been wound up in the High Court and the immediate priority was to continue
safe operation of the site.

The company was transferred to the Official Receiver because British Steel,
its shareholders and the government were not able to, or would not, support
the business. That meant the company did not have to funds to pay for an
administration.”

While domestic steel in the United States has had far from an easy route
since Trump’s economic protections saved them from total eradication – with
shares in steel firms widely plummeting
<https://edition.cnn.com/2019/05/21/investing/steel-stocks-tariffs/index.htm
l>  after a bout of overproduction – the industry has undeniably been
rescued from an impending demise by the Trump tariffs; if only for a time.

Absent the controversial protections erected by the administration, US steel
firms would be facing the exact same crises as their British counterparts
thanks to developing and state-managed economies like China flooding the
markets with cheap imports to drive out competition. In fairness for their
own part, the British mills have been under assault on all sides as the UK’s
floundering ‘Brexit’ negotiations induce spiteful EU members to cut out
British steel imports altogether.

But in the United States, things are looking tentatively optimistic for a
steel industry previously suffering from decades of abuse from the
globalized market.

CNN Business is even forced to accept the undeniable industry revitalization
post-Trump protectionism in the steel sector admitting,

“Steel mills
<http://www.cnn.com/2019/02/12/business/us-steel-mill/index.html>  reopened,
adding about 9,000 jobs to the industry. Existing mills also increased their
output. More domestic capacity could be on the way. American steelmakers
have announced plans to spend billions of dollars to increase capacity by 10
million tons annually since the tariffs were announced. Nucor alone has said
it will spend more than $2 billion to add more than 2.6 million tons of
capacity in the coming years.

The tariffs encouraged American steel companies to increase investment
beyond simply increasing capacity. The steelmakers argue they needed to make
the investment to be competitive for the future.

For example, US Steel announced this month that it is it is spending $1.2
billion on a new kind of steel mill that turns molten steel directly into
thin sheets of steel on rolls. That technology would eliminate the step that
steelmakers have used for more than a century to pour steel into thick
slabs, let newly formed slabs cool and then reheat those slabs to press the
steel into thin rolls. US Steel’s plant would be the first in the country
and one of only a few in the world.

“We’re now pivoting from playing defense to offense,” said CEO David
Burritt.

Tariffs still are far from a desirable economic tool, and their use can
never be considered lightly. But when economic competitors aren’t playing by
the rules of free trade perhaps Trump’s ‘fair trade’, tariffs and all, isn’t
the economic cancer many market players and academics warned it would be.

In fact, if the collapse of British Steel is any indication ‘fair trade’ may
very well have saved countless hardworking Americans their livelihoods.

Editor’s note: There is little doubt that Trump’s tough negotiations with
China are having ramifications all over the world, and they are affecting
more than just America. China knows that it can target our friends and we
will be sympathetic. They believe this could be our weakness.

But China has been at war with us for a long time, without our leadership
having the guts to recognize it. China’s economic power is largely based on
technology they stole from us, and markets they have cheated to acquire.
Trump is the first political leader (in the world) to have the business
acumen to recognize how China has cheated and to have the guts to take them
on, head on.

China hopes, and could be on the path to become the country with the biggest
economy, with the biggest military, and the most influence.  Is it too late
to maintain our lead?  In ten years, it will be.

Trump could be our last hope. 

EM         -> { Trump for 2020 }

On the 49th Parallel          

                 Thé Mulindwas Communication Group
"With Yoweri Museveni, Ssabassajja and Dr. Kiiza Besigye, Uganda is in
anarchy"
                    Kuungana Mulindwa Mawasiliano Kikundi
"Pamoja na Yoweri Museveni, Ssabassajja na Dk. Kiiza Besigye, Uganda ni
katika machafuko" 

 

_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet

UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to