No ‘treason.’ No coup. Just lies — and dumb lies at that. 

James Comey 

2 hrs ago 

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published
by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or
Microsoft.

James Comey is a former director of the FBI and a former deputy attorney
general.

It is tempting for normal people to ignore our president when he starts
ranting about treason and corruption at the FBI
<https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-mar
ine-one-departure-38/> . I understand the temptation. I’m the object of many
of his rants, and even I try to ignore him.

But we shouldn’t, because millions of good people believe what a president
of the United States says. In normal times, that’s healthy. But not now,
when the president is a liar who doesn’t care what damage he does to vital
institutions. We must call out his lies that the FBI was corrupt and
committed treason, that we spied on the Trump campaign, and tried to defeat
Donald Trump. We must constantly return to the stubborn facts. 

Russia engaged <https://www.justice.gov/file/1035477/download>  in a massive
effort to interfere in the 2016 presidential election
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/clinton-blames-putins-personal-grud
ge-against-her-for-election-interference/2016/12/16/12f36250-c3be-11e6-8422-
eac61c0ef74d_story.html?utm_term=.2d3ec9faf187> . Near as I can tell, there
is only one U.S. leader who still denies that fact. The FBI saw the attack
starting in mid-June 2016
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/russian-government-h
ackers-penetrated-dnc-stole-opposition-research-on-trump/2016/06/14/cf006cb4
-316e-11e6-8ff7-7b6c1998b7a0_story.html?utm_term=.f928ba9bdb80> , with the
first dumping of stolen emails. In late July
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2018/02/05/a-so-far-complet
e-timeline-of-the-investigation-into-trump-and-russia/?utm_term=.226f4ef8140
8> , when we were hard at work trying to understand the scope of the effort,
we learned that one of Trump’s foreign policy advisers knew about the
Russian effort seven weeks before we did.

In April 2016, that adviser talked to a Russian agent in London
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2017/10/30/timeline-how-a-t
rump-adviser-tried-to-work-with-the-russian-government/?utm_term=.0436ca8f86
4d> , learned that the Russians had obtained “dirt” on Hillary Clinton in
the form of thousands of emails, and that the Russians could assist the
Trump campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to
Clinton. Of course, nobody from the Trump campaign told us this (or about
later Russian approaches); we had to learn it, months after the fact, from
an allied ambassador.

But when we finally learned of it in late July, what should the FBI have
done? Let it go? Go tell the Trump campaign? Tell the press? No.
Investigate, to see what the facts were. We didn’t know what was true. Maybe
there was nothing to it, or maybe Americans were actively conspiring with
the Russians. To find out, the FBI would live up to its name and
investigate.

As director, I was determined that the work would be done carefully,
professionally and discretely. We were just starting. If there was nothing
to it, we didn’t want to smear Americans. If there was something to it, we
didn’t want to let corrupt Americans know we were on to them. So, we kept it
secret. That’s how the FBI approaches all counterintelligence cases.

And there’s the first problem with Trump’s whole “treason” narrative. If we
were “deep state” Clinton loyalists bent on stopping him, why would we keep
it secret? Why wouldn’t the much-maligned FBI supervisor Peter Strzok
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/04/26/trumps-latest-coup-table
-pounding-follows-classic-example-fox-news-feedback-loop/?utm_term=.5901fcb5
ab71>  — the alleged kingpin of the “treasonous” plot to stop Trump — tell
anyone? He was one of the very few people who knew what we were
investigating.

We investigated. We didn’t gather information about the campaign’s strategy.
We didn’t “spy” on anyone’s campaign. We investigated to see whether it was
true that Americans associated with the campaign had taken the Russians up
on any offer of help. By late October, the investigators thought they had
probable cause to get a federal court order to conduct electronic
surveillance of a former Trump campaign adviser named Carter Page. Page was
no longer with the campaign, but there was reason to believe he was acting
as an agent of the Russian government. We asked a federal judge for
permission to surveil him
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2018/01/31/what-we-know-abo
ut-the-warrant-to-surveil-carter-page/?utm_term=.6afe2b9482a4>  and then we
did it, all without revealing our work, despite the fact that it was late
October and a leak would have been very harmful to candidate Trump. Worst
deep-state conspiracy ever.

But wait, the conspiracy idea gets dumber. On Oct. 28
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/apps/g/page/politics/oct-28-fbi-letter-to-co
ngressional-leaders-on-clinton-email-investigation/2113/> , after agonizing
deliberation over two terrible options, I concluded I had no choice but to
inform Congress that we had reopened the Clinton email investigation
<https://www.cnn.com/2016/11/06/politics/comey-tells-congress-fbi-has-not-ch
anged-conclusions/index.html> . I judged that hiding that fact — after
having told Congress repeatedly and under oath that the case was finished —
would be worse than telling Congress the truth. It was a decision William
Barr praised
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/james-comey-did-the-right-thing/201
6/10/31/7fcf0018-9f84-11e6-a44d-cc2898cfab06_story.html?utm_term=.a31825bd7b
ce>  and Hillary Clinton blamed for her loss 11 days later. Strzok, alleged
architect of the treasonous plot to stop Trump, drafted the letter I sent
Congress.

And there’s still more to the dumbness of the conspiracy allegation. At the
center of the alleged FBI “corruption” we hear so much about was the
conclusion that Deputy Director Andrew McCabe lied to internal investigators
about a disclosure to the press in late October 2016. McCabe was fired over
it
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/fbis-andrew-mccabe-i
s-fired-a-little-more-than-24-hours-before-he-could-retire/2018/03/16/e055a2
2a-2895-11e8-bc72-077aa4dab9ef_story.html?utm_term=.942a828bcf71> . And what
was that disclosure? Some stop-Trump election-eve screed? No. McCabe
authorized a disclosure that revealed the FBI was actively investigating the
Clinton Foundation
<https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/383080-watchdog-fired-fbi-offi
cial-mccabe-leaked-to-media-to-help-himself> , a disclosure that was harmful
to Clinton.

There is a reason the non-fringe media doesn’t spend much time on this
“treason” and “corruption” business. The conspiracy theory makes no sense.
The FBI wasn’t out to get Donald Trump. It also wasn’t out to get Hillary
Clinton. It was out to do its best to investigate serious matters while
walking through a vicious political minefield.

But go ahead, investigate the investigators, if you must. When those
investigations are over, they will find the work was done appropriately and
focused only on discerning the truth of very serious allegations. There was
no corruption. There was no treason. There was no attempted coup. Those are
lies, and dumb lies at that. There were just good people trying to figure
out what was true, under unprecedented circumstances. 

EM         -> { Trump for 2020 }

On the 49th Parallel          

                 Thé Mulindwas Communication Group
"With Yoweri Museveni, Ssabassajja and Dr. Kiiza Besigye, Uganda is in
anarchy"
                    Kuungana Mulindwa Mawasiliano Kikundi
"Pamoja na Yoweri Museveni, Ssabassajja na Dk. Kiiza Besigye, Uganda ni
katika machafuko" 

 

 

_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet

UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to