New Strzok-Page Emails Reveal FBI Gave Special Treatment to Hillary
Clinton’s Demands for Email Investigation Information Just Before Election


JUNE 03, 2019

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today it received 218 pages
<https://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/jw-v-doj-strzok-page-emails-
prod-6-00154/>  of disgraced former FBI officials Peter Strzok-Lisa Page
emails which show then-FBI General Counsel James Baker instructing FBI
officials to expedite the release of FBI investigative material to Hillary
Clinton’s lawyer, David Kendall in August 2016. Kendall and the FBI’s top
lawyer discussed specifically quickly obtaining the “302” report of the
FBI/DOJ interview of Mrs. Clinton.

The emails also show the FBI failed to document at least four interviews of
witnesses in the Clinton email investigation.

The documents were obtained in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit
<https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-sues
-text-messages-fbis-strzok-page/>  filed after the Justice Department failed
to respond to a December 4, 2017, FOIA request (
<https://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/jw-v-doj-strzok-comms-travel
-complaint-00154/> Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No.
1:18-cv-00154)) for:

*       All records of communications, including but not limited to, emails,
text messages and instant chats, between FBI official Peter Strozk and FBI
attorney Lisa Page;
*       All travel requests, travel authorizations, travel vouchers and
expense reports of Peter Strozk;
*       All travel requests, travel authorizations, travel vouchers and
expense reports of Lisa Page.

On August 16, 2016
<https://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/jw-v-doj-strzok-page-emails-
prod-6-00154-pg-103/> , at 10:02 p.m. Baker
<https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-sues
-for-records-of-former-fbi-counsel-bakers-communications-with-anti-trump-dos
sier-author/>  emails then-Associate Deputy Director David Bowdich; Michael
Steinbach, former executive assistant director for national security; former
Acting Assistant Director Jason V. Herring; former FBI lawyer Lisa Page;
former Principal Deputy General Counsel Trisha Anderson; Michael Kortan, FBI
assistant director for public affairs, now retired; James Rybicki, former
chief of staff to Comey; and others to inform them that he “just spoke” with
Clinton’s lawyer Kendall, who requested documents from the FBI. Baker says
he told Kendall he would “need to submit a request.” Baker tells them, “I
said we would process it expeditiously.”

I just spoke with David Kendall … I conveyed our view that in order to
obtain the documents [FBI investigative material] they are seeking they need
to submit a request pursuant to the Privacy Act and FOIA. I said they could
submit a letter to me covering both statutes. They will send it in the
morning. I said that we would process it expeditiously. David asked us to
focus first on the Secretary’s 302 [FBI interview report]. I said OK.
[Redacted] We will have to focus on this issue tomorrow and get the 302 out
the door as soon as possible and then focus on the rest of the stuff.

The following day, August 17, 2016, Kendall sent a FOIA/Privacy Act request
<https://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/jw-v-doj-strzok-page-emails-
prod-6-00154-pg-116-128/>  on “behalf of former Secretary of State Hillary
Rodham Clinton” to the FBI’s top lawyer with a request for “expeditious
processing.” Baker passes this request to Bowdich, Steinbach, Herring, Page,
Anderson:

In my view, we need to move as quickly as possible on this, but pursuant to
David’s oral request last night, we should focus first on Secretary
Clinton’s 302…. Is the end of this week out of the question for her 302?

In a follow-up email exchange, the same day, Anderson arranged for Herring,
Page, former FBI Assistant Director and head of the Office of Congressional
Affairs Gregory Brower, Strzok and others to “coordinate a plan for
processing and releasing” Clinton’s 302, though one official reminds others
that they should process the request “consistent” with other requests.

Then, in an August 21, 2016, email exchange
<https://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/jw-v-doj-strzok-page-emails-
prod-6-00154-pg-166-168/>  Baker tells his people that he would “alert”
Kendall shortly before Clinton’s 302 was to be posted on the FBI’s FOIA
Vault webpage. On September 2, 2016, the FBI announced the release
<https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/fbi-releases-documents-in-
hillary-clinton-e-mail-investigation>  of Clinton’s interview documents.

Finally, on August 24, 2016, the acting FBI FOIA unit chief said
<https://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/jw-v-doj-strzok-page-emails-
prod-6-00154-pg-173-177/>  he sees “no problem” with giving Hillary’s
attorney a heads up before her records were posted to the Vault.

Other documents show that on August 5, 2016, Page, Strzok and FBI
intelligence analyst Jonathan Moffa are notified by a FBI assistant general
counsel from the national security law branch that additional 302’s were in
need of processing:

Today [Redacted] brought over additional 302s from the WFO [Washington Field
Office]. Are those supposed to go through the redaction process for
production to DOJ on Monday? We’re trying to figure out what needs to be
completed this weekend.

Page responds by writing
<https://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/jw-v-doj-strzok-page-emails-
prod-6-00154-pg-51/>  to Strzok, Moffa and others that four FBI 302 report
of interviews related to the Clinton “Midyear Exam
<https://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/doj-ig-report-06-14-18/> ”
investigation had never even been written:

[Redacted] to the best of my knowledge, yes they will when Pete identified
for [redacted] the DOJ edits that needed to be made to the 302s [redacted]
discovered that there were four (I think) 302s that had never been written.
What I don’t know is whose 302s they are but unless Pete or Jon are able to
respond in short order, I would throw them on the pile for redactions.
Thanks so much.

On August 24, 2016, Daily Beast reporter Shane Harris sent an inquiry
<https://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/jw-v-doj-strzok-page-emails-
prod-6-00154-pg-186-193/>  to the FBI asking if Comey’s admission to
Congress was accurate that Hillary’s lawyers at William & Connolly did not
possess the security clearances needed to see and possess highly classified
Hillary emails being stored at their law offices. Harris’s question set off
a scramble at the top of the FBI all the way up to Comey over the next 28
hours, producing a seven-page (mostly redacted) email discussion, with Lisa
Page concluding, “Could we say something more equivocal?”

In a September 1, 2016, email exchange
<https://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/jw-v-doj-strzok-page-emails-
prod-6-00154-pg-6-10/> , Page, Strzok, Office of Public Affairs official
Michael Kortan and Special Agent Richard Quinn discuss an email from The
Hill’s John Solomon, wherein Solomon forwarded them his draft article for
Circa.com citing “government sources” detailing extensive evidence the FBI
had collected, which showed Hillary Clinton “violated federal record-keeping
laws” through her use of a private BlackBerry and server, despite the
security and legal risks she was told they posed.  Solomon asked for any
final “guidance” from the FBI before publishing. Page writes to Moffa,
Strzok and a redacted FBI official, it was “pretty inaccurate,” but provided
nothing to support her charge of its inaccuracy. Judicial Watch’s work on
the Hillary Clinton email scandal is cited extensively in the column
<https://www.circa.com/story/2016/09/01/fbi-found-extensive-evidence-hillary
-emails-violated-federal-records-laws> , and former U.S. Attorney Matt
Whitaker was quoted as well, saying a special prosecutor was needed to look
into Hillary’s use of the personal server.

On August 16, 2016, after Congress requested
<https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/fbi-send-clinton-interview-notes-congr
ess-n631206>  that the FBI supply additional copies of the binders of
Clinton server-investigation materials, an unidentified FBI official
complained
<https://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/jw-v-doj-strzok-page-emails-
prod-6-00154-pg-97-102/>  to his colleagues of being understaffed and under
supplied:

We literally do not have the office supplies to do this. Nor do I have the
IAs [Investigative Assistants/Analysts] for assistance…. These binders are
huge and each one took hours to compile.

***

I am not trying to throw shade…. I just wish decisions could get made by
considering resources.

I need people in [room] 7947 ready to go in the early AM and a charge card
for Staples.”

“These incredible documents show the leadership of the FBI rushed to give
Hillary Clinton her FBI interview report shortly before the election,” said
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “And the documents also show the FBI
failed to timely document interviews in the Clinton email ‘matter’ – further
confirming the whole investigation was a joke. AG Barr can’t reopen the
Clinton email investigation soon enough.” 

EM         -> { Trump for 2020 }

On the 49th Parallel          

                 Thé Mulindwas Communication Group
"With Yoweri Museveni, Ssabassajja and Dr. Kiiza Besigye, Uganda is in
anarchy"
                    Kuungana Mulindwa Mawasiliano Kikundi
"Pamoja na Yoweri Museveni, Ssabassajja na Dk. Kiiza Besigye, Uganda ni
katika machafuko" 

 

_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet

UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to