> -----Original Message-----
> From: DigiGod Q Frasch� [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, July 16, 1999 12:47 PM
> To: Sean Cribbs
> Cc: jos ui mailing list
> Subject: Re: [JOS-UI] peer-ui mappings
>
<snip>
> Another point of buisness, all this stuff is lowlevel JADE (if you dont
> know what Im talking about see JADE on the Wiki) and JADE, being the UI,
> isnt really part of the OS so should it be in org.jos?
> I dont think so, org.jade would be more appropriate since it is a JOS-only
> app and it would be a pretty big, no point getting it all mixed up with
> JOS (its easier for everyone this way)
>
> Cheers,
> DigiGod
> _________________________
>
>
I'll take the opportunity here to disagree. JADE should go directly into
the org.jos.ui.jade.* tree. It should not go into its own org.jade package
because it is going to be directly interfacing with org.jos.core.* for such
things as the registry and for starting new processes, etc. JADE will be as
much an integral part of JOS as anything else is.
Regards,
Avery J. Regier
_______________________________________________
UI maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jos.org/mailman/listinfo/ui
