On 12/22/06, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eddie Epstein wrote:
> Doesn't that previous discussion read on the topic of global indexes?

Is it my brain, or this sentence, that doesn't make any sense ;-)  Could
you explain?


Must be Eddie's Southern US dialect. ;)  I'm not familiar with that
use of "read on" either.  From context I'm guessing it's supposed to
mean the same thing as "speak to" as in, "has relevance to".

-Adam

Reply via email to