[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-10?page=all ]
Marshall Schor resolved UIMA-10.
--------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Adam Lally (was: Marshall Schor)
Thanks for pointing out the need to switch more things over to using JCas
instead of JCasImpl. I did a workspace-wide search for all uses of JCasImpl,
and I think I switched all that could be over to use JCas.
Assigning to Lally to see if he can find any more things to fix :-) Others can
of course contribute too.
> Split JCas into interface and implementation
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: UIMA-10
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-10
> Project: UIMA
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Core Java Framework
> Reporter: Adam Lally
> Assigned To: Adam Lally
> Fix For: 2.1
>
>
> We should split the existing JCAS class into an interface
> org.apache.uima.jcas.JCas and its implementation
> org.apache.uima.jcas.impl.JCasImpl. This follows good design practices and
> also is consistent with the rest of uimaj-core. It is important to do this
> prior to our first release since it will be a non-compatible change for user
> code.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
