On 1/4/07, Adam Lally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/4/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lev Kozakov wrote:
> > <snip>
> > I thought that your intention was to emphasize that the old TAE output
> > format is not available any more.
>
> I'm not trying to "emphasize". I thought, from previous comments, that
> there
> was a flag, called "-ae", which could be set "true" or "false".
> So I thought there might be some code out there that was using this -ae
flag
> to generate a "TAE" by setting it to "false".
>
I think the siutation is that -ae didn't take a true/false parameter.
Either -ae was specified or it was omitted. If it was omitted then a
<taeDescription> would be generated.
That's right.
My understanding is that this has been changed so an
<analysisEngineDescription> is always generated regardless of whether
-ae is specified or not.
So, I think all the stuff about the -tae flag was just a
misunderstanding. I agree that reporting an exception for this flag
doesn't make sense, so let's remove that. I wouldn't object to
generic "unknown flag" error checking but I don't think it's critical.
-Adam
OK, I'll remove the specific error related to the '-tae' flag and replace it
with general error ('unknown flag').
