Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
I think there is sufficient resistance to the CommonCas, and we should
undo the change. Marshall?
I don't think it would be good to undo this. It seems valuable to me to
factor out common things, make more explicit what's
intended to be the same, and what's intended to be different, and
factoring shrinks the code base,
making future maintenance easier. Of course, if we adopt the
get-rid-of-JCas as a separate interface
suggestion, then this goes away. I'm fine with picking a better name
for it, also.
-Marshall
It seems we not only have different technical opinions, but we're not
agreed on process, either. You're the only one in favor of this change,
with me strongly opposed, Adam not in favor, and the rest silent. We've
both given our technical reasons, we're not going to reach consensus.
In my understanding, this means that the change is not approved and
doesn't go in. What is your opinion on how to handle such a case?
--Thilo
- Re: CAS/JCas/CommonCas Thilo Goetz
-
