Re: OSGi enablement and JCas

[Thilo Goetz]

a) backward compatibility and b) some people actually seem to be using 
it and don't want to be without it.

Eddie Epstein wrote:
On 1/9/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Right, but we've been over that.  Although I don't like distributed
definitions, either, it seems we're stuck with them for the time being.
  Without distributed type definitions, a lot of things are easier, with
or without OSGi ;-)

What is the logic that explains why we are stuck with distributed type
definitions?

Eddie