On 1/9/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I guess not, actually. The current approach is really not too nice, though. If I revert my change, subsumes() is broken for array types. But then, we don't properly support them, anyway.
Since it's not possible to create new instances of these types, the fact that subsumes is broken doesn't really affect users.
So should I just back out the change and defer the issue to post-2.1? I'd be fine with that.
Yes, I think so. -Adam
