On 1/19/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can this design be made more "idiot-proof" (we're all idiots from time
to time ;-) )?  For instance, if the user "forgets" to discard the
CasCopier, can that throw some kind of error?

This is just a manifestation of the old problem of an annotator
holding onto a FeatureStructure reference after the process call has
finished.  It is not so easy to catch without some major redesign,
such as passing annotators CAS "handles" that forward to the real CAS
but can be invalidated.  Certainly this is not something to be
attempted for 2.1.

-Adam

Reply via email to