[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Marshall Schor updated UIMA-239:
--------------------------------

    Description: 
An example of a problem which happens if this is not done: the descriptors that 
come with the UIMA toolkit have a comment that specifies the license 
information for that file. If you edit a descriptor containing such a comment 
with the CDE, it strips out all comments.

An alternative for license info: add a new, optional element to the descriptor 
for specifying the license (but this might  be ambigious as to what is being 
licensed - the descriptor file or what it refers to or ??? )

  was:
As an example, the descriptors that come with the UIMA toolkit have a comment 
that specifies the license information for that file. If you edit a descriptor 
containing such a comment with the CDE, it strips out all comments.

An alternative for license info: add a new, optional element to the descriptor 
for specifying the license (but this might  be ambigious as to what is being 
licensed - the descriptor file or what it refers to or ??? )

        Summary: Tools like the CDE which use XML parsing should preserve XML 
comments; parsers should provide access to XML comments.  (was: Tools like the 
CDE which use XML parsing need should preserve XML comments.; parsers should 
provide access to XML comments.)

typos

> Tools like the CDE which use XML parsing should preserve XML comments; 
> parsers should provide access to XML comments.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: UIMA-239
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-239
>             Project: UIMA
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core Java Framework, Tools
>            Reporter: Marshall Schor
>
> An example of a problem which happens if this is not done: the descriptors 
> that come with the UIMA toolkit have a comment that specifies the license 
> information for that file. If you edit a descriptor containing such a comment 
> with the CDE, it strips out all comments.
> An alternative for license info: add a new, optional element to the 
> descriptor for specifying the license (but this might  be ambigious as to 
> what is being licensed - the descriptor file or what it refers to or ??? )

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to