There is more work to combine C++, but I would vote to do so, mainly so that documentation and web pages are updated and interoperability is given a new perspective.
Eddie On 4/26/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We have a few things that people are waiting for, notably Pear related things. I would propose to shoot for having the next release candidate ready by the end of May (so we could hopefully do the release in early June). Thoughts? How about the C++ version? Are we keeping that completely separate, or should there be a common release? I guess the next version will be 2.2. That's our working number in Jira, anyway. Any reason to go to anything else, like 2.1.1? --Thilo
