On 7/10/07, Benjamin Sznajder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The hasNext() method returns false when the CASMerger did not finish to
"merge".
When the hasNext() method returns false, then the inputted CAS passes to
the CASConsumer. I expected that no CAS is outputted until hasNext()
returns true.
Is it the wished behavior?
Hi Benjamin,
This behavior of the built-in flow controller is designed to
demonstrate a segmenting Cas multiplier at the front of an aggregate.
It is not intended for all circumstances, and of course you can
replace this code to achieve other behaviors.
Eddie
