On 7/12/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What's unclear about this method?
You can get a Type object that represents a typed-array, but there is no way to create an instance of such an array. What good is it then to get the Type object? -Adam
Adam Lally wrote: > On 7/12/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Before we start deprecating methods, though, I would prefer it if we >> sat down and thought the whole array story through. What we have now >> could certainly use improvement, but I would like to understand what >> the real design is that we're aiming at. > > I think it is okay to deprecate first and understand later. A method > that we don't understand all the implications of and which we may want > to change later is a good one to discourage users from using today. > > -Adam
