I didn't know you could have multiple affected versions, that's even better. I'll do some Jira housekeeping tomorrow as well.
--Thilo Marshall Schor wrote: > Good points - I'll keep both versions from now on. I was trying to > clean up Jira > a bit to see if we had any remaining issues that needed attention in > this release. > > There are some which I didn't know anything about - so I left as affects > 2.1 (only). > These are mostly things Thilo and Adam might know the status of... > please have a look :-) > > -Marshall > > Adam Lally wrote: >> On 7/17/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I wonder: is it a good idea to change the "affects version" label >>> for these issues? I mean, they do affect 2.1, and since they haven't >>> been fixed it's reasonable to assume that they affect 2.2 also. >>> Is there an advantage to changing this? >>> >> >> I think you can actually select multiple versions for the "Affects >> Version/s" label. So I definitely wouldn't remove 2.1. >> >> As to whether it's worth the effort to add 2.2, it might make sense to >> do this to support using the JIRA search to search for issues >> affecting a particular version. I'm assuming JIRA doesn't do the >> inference that unresolved issues affecting 2.1 also affect 2.2. >> >> -Adam >> >>
