I'm sure you all saw Ant's question. Anybody remember why it is the way it is? We must have had a reason at the time, but I sure don't remember what it was ;-)
--Thilo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.1-incubating Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:53:05 +0000 From: ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [...] i did wonder why the jVinci jar doesn't have a uima- prefix or use the org.apache.uima package name but it looks fine in the maven repository so i guess that doesn't matter. ...ant
