On Dec 20, 2007 12:19 PM, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So - my preference would be mostly one of "don't care", but with a very > slight leaning toward having the release event result in the creation of > a new subdir under d/i/uima/<release-identification> and under that, the > set of files that go with that release; with files that don't change > with each release, like KEYS, at the top. Such an organization would > allow a user browsing the directories to download both the binary and > source releases for a particular version, perhaps slightly more easily. > > I can also see the value of top level "binaries, source, docs" > organization, because a user browsing the directory would likely have in > mind one of these things they want to go after (although, that might run > into difficulties if we distribute things that don't fall into these > categories, at some point). >
I also see value both ways. But given that ant, commons, and httpd do it with the top-level "binaries, source, docs" organization, my (slight) preference would be to do it that way. If there are any users who actually go poking around directly in dist/incubator, it would be nice for them if there was some consistency. -Adam
