Marshall Schor wrote: > Michael Baessler wrote: >> Marshall Schor wrote: >> >>> ... >>> Michael - when I looked into this, I think I found that to add a Pear to >>> a flow, you import the <pearSpecifier> descriptor. This is different >>> from the CustomResourceSpecifier. Is this correct? >>> >> Yes that is correct a pearSpecifier is similar to a >> CustomResourceSpecifier but it is a separate independent descriptor. >> >>> I had assumed, from your question, that the CustomResourceSpecifier was >>> used when importing a pear, but I think this is not right. Please >>> confirm :-). Assuming I got that part right, does the CDE need to do >>> something about CustomResourceSpecifiers? Is this related to the the >>> Pear specifier somehow? >>> >> I think the CDE should be able two handle both specifier types. > When you say "handle" - do you mean that it should be possible to add to > an aggregate flow a descriptor whose type is > <customResourceSpecifier...>? What would be the meaning of this? I > don't think the framework would validate such a thing? Or did you mean > something different by "handle"? > > -Marshall > To be honest, I currently don't know what the CDE checks if I add a primitive ae to an aggregate. So what I mean with "handle" is, that the CDE should be able to add a CustomResourceSpecifier or a pearSpecifer to an aggregate ae.
-- Michael
