> I think the best course of action might be to release it as a separate > package for the time being, with the understanding that it may get > folded into either the UIMA project or NLTK at some future date -- > among other things, this will give it a little time to mature. I'll > probably set up a project for it on sourceforge. Any preference > between the following names: pycas, pyuima, uimapy?
For what it is worth, I like uimapy to be consistent with uimaj and uimacpp. > > Are these changes in the latest zip file? I downloaded and tried > > again, getting a slightly different error trace: > > It looks like I didn't update the download link when I bumped the > version number from 0.1 to 0.2. It should work now. :) > > <http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~edloper/pycas> Oh goody, but not sure when I'll get a chance to look for the next bug :) Eddie
