[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Lally closed UIMA-826.
---------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed, and test case included.
> Type System Merging does not work consistently when a type is declared twice
> with different supertypes
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: UIMA-826
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-826
> Project: UIMA
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core Java Framework
> Affects Versions: 2.2.1
> Reporter: Adam Lally
> Assignee: Adam Lally
> Fix For: 2.2.2
>
>
> When type system merging is done, if the same type is declared twice with
> different supertypes, then the result depends on the order in which the types
> are declared.
> For example, given the type system descriptors:
> TS1.xml:
> <typeSystemDescription xmlns="http://uima.apache.org/resourceSpecifier";>
> <types>
> <typeDescription>
> <name>Sub</name>
> <description>Example type.</description>
> <supertypeName>uima.tcas.Annotation</supertypeName>
> </typeDescription>
> </types>
> </typeSystemDescription>
> TS2.xml:
> <typeSystemDescription xmlns="http://uima.apache.org/resourceSpecifier";>
> <types>
> <typeDescription>
> <name>Sub</name>
> <description>Example type.</description>
> <supertypeName>Super</supertypeName>
> </typeDescription>
> <typeDescription>
> <name>Super</name>
> <description>Example type.</description>
> <supertypeName>uima.tcas.Annotation</supertypeName>
> </typeDescription>
> </types>
> </typeSystemDescription>
> If you merge them in the order TS1.xml, TS2.xml it will fail with the error
> message: "The Type Sub is declared twice, with incompatible supertypes Super
> and uima.tcas.Annotation". But if you merge them in the order TS2.xml,
> TS1.xml it will succeed!
> The intended behavior is that the merge should succeed and the resulting
> supertype should be "Super" (the lower of the two declared supertypes in the
> type hierarchy). It is only supposed to fail if the different declared
> supertypes are not in the same inheritance chain (neither inherits from the
> other). But that code is broken in the case where the two subtype
> declarations are processed before the supertype declarations.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
