> This will not affect releases of the core UIMA. In addition, we can avoid > this by changing the release process to not distribute ActiveMQ (or any > other 5D002 component), and instead have some kind of install process that > (a) obtained these components from (say) the maven repositories, and (b) > applied the patches needed (we needed to patch some things in ActiveMQ to > fix bugs we reported). > > I think this might be preferable, but perhaps I'm overreacting to the > prospect of tagging UIMA-AS with the 5D002 designation. > >> >>
http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/ shows that many popular Apache projects are tagged 5D002. Given the inconvenience of requiring every user to do additional downloads and deal with patching some HTTP related jars in ActiveMQ, staying with a complete SDK package for UIMA AS seems like the right choice. If this presents a real problem for some users we can create alternatives later. Eddie
