OK, I will try to set up an initial project with a Maven build and with pointers where the documentation should be added. Let you know when it's done.
-- Michael B. Michael Tanenblatt wrote: > My personal preference is to put ConceptMapper out as a separate project > for now, then merge the two over time. Realistically, I am not sure I > have a huge amount of time to figure out how to merge these things right > now (I am going to be on vacation starting Wednesday for 2 1/2 weeks, > then I'll have to catch up with all the things that piled up over that > time...). Ultimately, I agree that there should be one annotator that > does this job, not two. > > On Jun 20, 2008, at 3:30 AM, Thilo Goetz wrote: > >> Michael Baessler wrote: >>> When looking at issue UIMA-1033 the software grant for ConceptMapper >>> has been received and recorded. >>> This means we can put the code to SVN. So what is our strategy, do we >>> create a new project in the >>> Sandbox for ConceptMapper and treat it as new annotator or do we want >>> to use concepts of both >>> dictionary annotator components and create one new component? >>> -- Michael >> >> Since Michael T and you are doing all the work, I would >> just follow along with whatever you two think is best. >> >> --Thilo >
